-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
DOC: small improvements to the netCDF docs #1169
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for working on this!
Formats supported by Pandas | ||
--------------------------- | ||
|
||
For more options, consider exporting your objects to pandas |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's call CSV and other tabular formats in particular.
netCDF because xarray was based on the netCDF data model, so netCDF files on disk | ||
The recommended way to store xarray objects is `netCDF`__. | ||
netCDF is a file format for fully self-described datasets that | ||
is widely used and supported on almost all platforms. xarray is based on the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with the sentiment here, but I think it might still be a good idea to mention at least that netCDF "originated in the geosciences".
is widely used in the geosciences and supported on almost all platforms. We use | ||
netCDF because xarray was based on the netCDF data model, so netCDF files on disk | ||
The recommended way to store xarray objects is `netCDF`__. | ||
netCDF is a file format for fully self-described datasets that |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's add binary file format
Thanks! Updated |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great now, thanks!
Partly addresses #768 (comment) and #1154, mostly by making the tone less defensive. I also added that we recommend the netCDF format for IO. (I think that the format is powerful enough for being useful in other disciplines than geosciences).
I agree with @rabernat that the current page title (Serialization and IO) could be changed to something more accessible, but I don't know how. Two possibilities, both quite long (it looks a bit ugly on RTD):