Skip to content

Conversation

jacobtylerwalls
Copy link
Member

@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls commented May 7, 2022

Steps

  • For new features or bug fixes, add a ChangeLog entry describing what your PR does.
  • Write a good description on what the PR does.

Description

Type of Changes

Type
βœ“ πŸ› Bug fix

Related Issue

Refs pylint-dev/pylint#6539. We might be able to just close the issue, as the test will look identical in pylint.

@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls added this to the 2.11.5 milestone May 7, 2022
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 7, 2022

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2287062474

  • 2 of 2 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.002%) to 91.737%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 2285557844: 0.002%
Covered Lines: 9159
Relevant Lines: 9984

πŸ’› - Coveralls

@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls added pylint-tested PRs that don't cause major regressions with pylint needs-backport labels May 7, 2022
Copy link
Member

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

πŸ‘

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pylint-tested PRs that don't cause major regressions with pylint
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants