Skip to content

Add workflow_dispatch trigger [ci] #2804

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 15, 2025
Merged

Conversation

cdce8p
Copy link
Member

@cdce8p cdce8p commented Aug 14, 2025

Related Pylint PR: pylint-dev/pylint#10498

@cdce8p cdce8p added the Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining astroid or the dev workflow label Aug 14, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.30%. Comparing base (8e19277) to head (3287630).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2804   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.30%   93.30%           
=======================================
  Files          91       91           
  Lines       11083    11083           
=======================================
  Hits        10341    10341           
  Misses        742      742           
Flag Coverage Δ
linux 93.16% <ø> (ø)
pypy 93.30% <ø> (ø)
windows 93.28% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@cdce8p cdce8p merged commit 3866741 into pylint-dev:main Aug 15, 2025
20 checks passed
@cdce8p cdce8p deleted the workflow-dispatch branch August 15, 2025 07:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining astroid or the dev workflow
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants