-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Bounded now works with array bounds #1604
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@ColCarroll is it possible to refactor |
LGTM after the advice from @ferrine is taken on board. |
@ferrine i'm not sure what you mean by a |
@ColCarroll it is a class, not instance |
I'm still not sure what you mean -- do you have an example of your envisioned API? (or feel free to grab this branch and fix it!) |
@ColCarroll the following check should pass: |
ah, thank you! |
2030c2d
to
ccc603e
Compare
Does it still provide nonsense results? |
Yeah, it still provides nonsense results. |
Do we merge anyway? |
I'd be happy with a merge, since it doesn't appear to create any new bugs
(and contains some improvements). It seems like the nonsense results are a
separate problem, and someone else may have more bandwidth to fix that.
…On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 6:24 PM Peadar Coyle ***@***.***> wrote:
Do we merge anyway?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1604 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACMHED6idiD79J5TiG5X8pq20f8g2nHTks5rJxI5gaJpZM4LM7oy>
.
|
Addresses #1491 . The sampling now runs, but produces nonsense results. Could use another set of eyes on this!
https://gist.github.com/ColCarroll/f003b12bf52b8e3893e2222a9a5f28ab
is the current output.