-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
DOCS Updating the Rugby docs #2766
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Anyone know why this build is breaking? @twiecki @junpenglao ? |
It looks like travis randomly killed everything... I restarted all builds |
Oh, you might need to rebase off master: we pinned Notebook diffs are hard to see what changed! Generally there are a few edits I would make on the introduction. Feel free to ignore (especially ones that aren't associated with this change), and I can make a bunch of nits myself in a future PR.
Note that I changed the link for the Baio and Blangiardo paper, since the old one is dead.
|
4c7b074
to
4fba90c
Compare
I made those changes you suggested Colin. |
If this builds correctly we can merge it I think. There's a few nitpicks etc, but I could fix them or @ColCarroll at some other point. |
Making changes based on what Colin suggested Forgot the rugby.csv file
4fba90c
to
7492b9a
Compare
This is really good - I like that we have a new data set! Feel free to merge whenever - you did not write any code that is run in the test suite, so travis is not going to say anything useful. (I am not merging right now because I am interested to see if it passes, or if travis is still unhappy for other reasons) |
I want to see that too. I think it's awesome we've another data set?
…On 29 Dec 2017 17:22, "Colin" ***@***.***> wrote:
This is really good - I like that we have a new data set! Feel free to
merge whenever - you did not write any code that is run in the test suite,
so travis is not going to say anything useful. (I am not merging right now
because I am interested to see *if* it passes, or if travis is still
unhappy for other reasons)
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2766 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA8DiC5EdwX51m8eh58lQYRfKgOwyooMks5tFRGugaJpZM4RPC7D>
.
|
Seems to still be failing....
…On 29 Dec 2017 17:39, "Peadar Coyle" ***@***.***> wrote:
I want to see that too. I think it's awesome we've another data set?
On 29 Dec 2017 17:22, "Colin" ***@***.***> wrote:
> This is really good - I like that we have a new data set! Feel free to
> merge whenever - you did not write any code that is run in the test suite,
> so travis is not going to say anything useful. (I am not merging right now
> because I am interested to see *if* it passes, or if travis is still
> unhappy for other reasons)
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#2766 (comment)>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA8DiC5EdwX51m8eh58lQYRfKgOwyooMks5tFRGugaJpZM4RPC7D>
> .
>
|
If you're using CONVERGENCE_TITLE = lambda: "BFMI = {}\nGelman-Rubin = {}".format(bfmi, max_gr) |
Looks good overall! My only comment is that you may be able to avoid duplicating some of the model math in |
I think the sample PPC could be a future PR
…On 1 Jan 2018 15:38, "Austin Rochford" ***@***.***> wrote:
Looks good overall! My only comment is that you may be able to avoid
duplicating some of the model math in simulate_season with sample_ppc.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2766 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA8DiE2JZEGGUV6d2PjdiJf5XboomrSJks5tGO3mgaJpZM4RPC7D>
.
|
Thanks @springcoil! |
Anyone know why the build is still failing? |
Travis CI is not building correctly in py2.7 on master for a while now. @twiecki will contact the Travis support. |
I've updated the Hierarchical Rugby model in the Documentation.
I've added - more data from more years, since before it only had 2014.
I've updated a few things in terms of the explanations, added a few more visualizations/ exploratory data analysis and added a few links to other resources.
I'd appreciate some proof reading, and for someone to verify if they run correctly.