-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
Ignore top_level.txt if installed-files.txt is available. #437
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
carljm
merged 2 commits into
pypa:develop
from
PiDelport:feature/issue-355-safe-uninstall
Jul 10, 2012
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hey @pjdelport , do you know when this elif will get run? we're already inside a block that's just for for pip installs I think.
also, you might know if we have any tests that run this elif block. I don't see anything right off.
The test you added is great, but it runs through the installed-files.txt block above this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks like that uninstall case would only happen if someone had done the install like so (not within pip)
"python setup.py install --single-version-externally-managed --record=<some log>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@qwcode: You're right. This particular issue and test was mainly about ensuring that the
elif
block does not get run when it shouldn't; i don't know what circumstances it would actually be required in.It doesn't seem to be covered by the test suite, at least: removing the whole block does not seem to induce any failures.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the reason this came up is in pull #646, which is fix for issue #638.
switching from
if
toelif
here exposed an issue that we needed to handle related to__pycache__
removal.notice that I added specific import calls to your new test and others to make sure we were handling
__pycache__
removal.