Skip to content

Changes to implement work stealing scheduler not included in a release #874

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
cpnat opened this issue Feb 7, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #875
Closed

Changes to implement work stealing scheduler not included in a release #874

cpnat opened this issue Feb 7, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #875

Comments

@cpnat
Copy link

cpnat commented Feb 7, 2023

Hello all,

I have recently been looking into the workstealing scheduler implemented here #862.

This has not be included in a release yet, although the docs have been updated. Are you able to give any update when you think a new release might be?

@cpnat cpnat closed this as completed Feb 7, 2023
@cpnat cpnat reopened this Feb 7, 2023
amezin added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2023
@amezin amezin mentioned this issue Feb 7, 2023
amezin added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2023
@cpnat
Copy link
Author

cpnat commented Feb 7, 2023

@amezin - wow, what a quick response. Thank you so much!

@amezin
Copy link
Collaborator

amezin commented Feb 12, 2023

This has not be included in a release yet, although the docs have been updated.

BTW @nicoddemus @RonnyPfannschmidt is it correct? Shouldn't readthedocs show docs for the latest release, not master branch, by default?

Otherwise unavailable (not yet released) CLI switches/options will confuse users. It would definitely be confusing for me as a user.

@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Member

Sounds like we need fix the config

@nicoddemus
Copy link
Member

I just changed the default version to stable, should be good now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants