Skip to content

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Sep 10, 2017

Fix #1548

I wanted to add some code to demonstrate but afraid it would be an overkill and make the doc too verbose.

Thanks for submitting a PR, your contribution is really appreciated!

Here's a quick checklist that should be present in PRs:

  • Add a new news fragment into the changelog folder
    • name it $issue_id.$type for example (588.bug)
    • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the pr
    • ensure type is one of removal, feature, bugfix, vendor, doc or trivial
    • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."
  • Target: for bugfix, vendor, doc or trivial fixes, target master; for removals or features target features;
  • Make sure to include reasonable tests for your change if necessary

Unless your change is a trivial or a documentation fix (e.g., a typo or reword of a small section) please:

  • Add yourself to AUTHORS;

@ghost ghost force-pushed the issue-1548-docs-multiple-calls-metafunc-parametrize branch from e4ccdac to 696c702 Compare September 10, 2017 04:23
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 91.805% when pulling e4ccdac on xuanluong:issue-1548-docs-multiple-calls-metafunc-parametrize into bee2c86 on pytest-dev:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 91.805% when pulling 696c702 on xuanluong:issue-1548-docs-multiple-calls-metafunc-parametrize into bee2c86 on pytest-dev:master.

@nicoddemus nicoddemus merged commit e57cc55 into pytest-dev:master Sep 10, 2017
@nicoddemus
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

clarify docs on Multiple Calls to metafunc.parametrize
3 participants