-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
[4.6] Merge pull request #5373 from asottile/revert_all_handling #5376
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Revert unrolling of `all()`
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work!
Thanks! Is the plan then to have this not for 4.6 (also later)? Would be good/ok I think. |
yeah I don't think we'll try and reintroduce this feature on the 4.6 branch |
Agreed. 👍 |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.6-maintenance #5376 +/- ##
====================================================
+ Coverage 39.16% 90.55% +51.38%
====================================================
Files 115 115
Lines 26399 26362 -37
Branches 2468 2603 +135
====================================================
+ Hits 10339 23871 +13532
+ Misses 15407 2163 -13244
+ Partials 653 328 -325
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
\o/ ;) |
@nicoddemus did you want to run this release? |
Not in particular, go ahead if you want. Otherwise I will do it in 3 hours or so when I get home. 👍 |
alright I'll prep it, feel free to take it the rest of the way out if I don't get to it in time :) |
Thanks, will do! 👍 |
here's 4.6.2: #5379 |
Revert unrolling of
all()
I had to manually resolve conflicts and apply the patch to
visit_Call_legacy
as well