Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Enhance errors for exception/warnings matching #8508
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhance errors for exception/warnings matching #8508
Changes from all commits
1ddb069
f434783
995d833
414e18f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if it wouldn't be better to use a straight str here instead of repr. With the new line format the quoting doesn't seem needed, perhaps the opposite.
(Either way is fine with me)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i believe for the regex it helps to get the escapes printed more nicely readable, my personal opinion is that repr reads slightly better than just the str or the escape
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to clarify, this will show as
I would have preferred
py\.test
overpy\\.test
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i just experimented with this - if there is a simple way to print "raw" strings, i'll happily use that - however even in the pytest testsuite there is a number of cases that would turn confusing without
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would be
{regexp}
instead of{regexp!r}
, unless I'm misunderstanding.Can you give an example?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I'm somewhat undecided here. I agree the double backslashes are a bit confusing, but at the same time I think it's good to print the repr for the input (considering that it can contain whitespace and such, and seeing that whitespace might be essential to find out why the pattern doesn't match).
But then if we use the repr for the input, it might be more consistent and thus less confusing if we use the repr for the pattern as well.