Switch to a MIT-licensed dependency

[DaniilGlazkoTR]

Openapi-schema-validator was using a GPL-licensed library strict_rfc3339, which might be incompatible with BSD. This pull request replaces strict_rfc3339 library with a different one - rfc3339_validator. This library is licensed under MIT.

Jsonschema library has already been updated to include an option to use a different RFC3339 checker by this Pull Request.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4 (48ffd98) into master (c86b093) will increase coverage by 1.50%.
The diff coverage is 77.77%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master       #4      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.38%   59.89%   +1.50%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         173      182       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits          101      109       +8     
- Misses         72       73       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
openapi_schema_validator/_format.py	65.88% <77.77%> (+2.72%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c86b093...48ffd98. Read the comment docs.

[RafalSkolasinski]

@p1c2u Is there a reason for not merging this?

[arrdem]

Bumping this. Under the terms of the GPLv3 license, openapi-schema-validator and its dependees cannot be distributed or used under MIT terms because of this single dependency.

Is there anything else you'd like to see here before this gets merged @p1c2u?

[RafalSkolasinski]

@arrdem not sure about your use case but I jest went with https://github.com/Julian/jsonschema and it did work for my needs.
Taking into account that there were no commits and barely any activity in this repo in last 8 months probably it was a right decision

[arrdem]

@RafalSkolasinski yeah I was able to bang out a tiny bit of code that solved my actual problem just using jsonschema directly yesterday. Oh well.

[AaronRobson]

Looks like this could do with a rebase to resolve the conflicts.

[DaniilGlazkoTR]

@AaronRobson, thanks for approving this PR. I've resolved the merge conflict, please consider merging it.

[AaronRobson]

@AaronRobson, thanks for approving this PR. I've resolved the merge conflict, please consider merging it.

Would if I could, sadly I don't have permissions for that.

[DaniilGlazkoTR]

@AaronRobson, thanks for approving this PR. I've resolved the merge conflict, please consider merging it.

Would if I could, sadly I don't have permissions for that.

Right, my apologies, I was under the impression that only members with Write permissions can review PRs in this repo.

[p1c2u]

Why not use both as an option