-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.1k
bpo-34903: For datetime.datetime.strptime(), the leading zero for some two-digit formats is optional. #14149
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6174093
Update rst file
mikegleen 74e9a1e
Add tests for single digit dates and times.
mikegleen 0447ebf
Cosmetic.
mikegleen 8f6e06e
Add comment.
mikegleen d12a6da
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
blurb-it[bot] fab6869
Update 2019-06-17-09-36-46.bpo-34903.r_wGRc.rst
mikegleen 5376b81
Move the subtest logic in line with the for loop.
mikegleen 6c001c1
Update 2019-06-17-09-36-46.bpo-34903.r_wGRc.rst
mikegleen b29515f
Move code to a separate method.
mikegleen 03c878c
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/mikegleen/cpython
mikegleen File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Documentation/2019-06-17-09-36-46.bpo-34903.r_wGRc.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||||||
Documented that in :meth:datetime.datetime.strptime(), the leading zero in some two-digit formats is optional. Patch by Mike Gleen. | ||||||
|
Documented that in :meth:datetime.datetime.strptime(), the leading zero in some two-digit formats is optional. Patch by Mike Gleen. | |
Documented that in :meth:`datetime.datetime.strptime()`, the leading zero in some two-digit formats is optional. Patch by Mike Gleen. |
This needs backticks so Sphinx can turn it into a link to the relevant method.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you have a comment to delim start/end of your block, it means that you have to add a new method, like:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm happy to make this change but note that the code immediately preceding mine has a similar comment for bpo-34482. Could you (@vstinner) and @pganssle please confirm?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In that case, move also the previous lines into a subtest (new method).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mikegleen It's fairly common for there to be stylistic and organizational inconsistencies in a file, because the codebase is large, old and has many contributors with different priorities (and different reviewers with different standards).
I tend to agree with Victor here. The main reason I didn't ask for this to be in a new test to start with was because, as you said, the current test suite tends towards these single monolithic tests and I prefer smaller tests and I wasn't sure if monolithic tests was a general policy or not. Given that Victor has much more experience than me with the project's conventions, I'm happy that he asked for this, because it will make me feel more confident in making smaller tests in the future. 😄
Also, as an aside, I'd like to thank you for your ongoing efforts in this PR, I think we're in the home stretch 😉