bpo-25810: Clarify eval() docs, it does not keywords (GH-15173)

[smokephil]

bpo-25810: Clarify eval() docs, it does not keywords (GH-15173)

https://bugs.python.org/issue25810

[the-knights-who-say-ni]

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately we couldn't find an account corresponding to your GitHub username on bugs.python.org (b.p.o) to verify you have signed the CLA (this might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in your b.p.o account settings). This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for your contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

[aeros]

Welcome and thanks for the contribution!

Based on the comment from R. David Murray:

I think we are moving toward using (and documenting in the main docs) the / notation. Especially since it shows up in the inspect module as well as the docstring help.

as well as the rest of the discussion on the issue, I think it would be more appropriate to use the / notation:

[miss-islington]

Thanks @smokephil for the PR, and @gpshead for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7, 3.8.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

[bedevere-bot]

GH-15910 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

[bedevere-bot]

GH-15911 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.