-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.9k
bpo-45997: Fix asyncio.Semaphore waiters order #30052
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA). Recognized GitHub usernameWe couldn't find a bugs.python.org (b.p.o) account corresponding to the following GitHub usernames: This might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in one's b.p.o account settings. This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at this contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue. You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received. Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PR adds unconditional sleep even if the waiting is not needed (the context was switched already).
I think we need an alternative implementation based on future object waiting.
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
I would like to return to PR in few weeks, I have idea where I will create Future, then will put it to loop via call_soon and in the end in acquire method waiting for that Future |
Alright @hyzyla, looking forward to what you'll come up with! |
#31910 is an alternative fix |
Thanks for the PR! |
Allow other Semaphore waiters to acquire lock after releasing by current coroutine by skipping one event loop iteration. If everything is OK for Semaphore, I can add the same logic to other asyncio synchronization primitives
https://bugs.python.org/issue45997