-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.1k
bpo-46603: improve coverage of typing._strip_annotations
#31063
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@@ -3355,6 +3355,15 @@ def barfoo4(x: BA3): ... | |||
{"x": typing.Annotated[int | float, "const"]} | |||
) | |||
|
|||
def test_get_type_hints_annotated_in_union(self): # bpo-46603 | |||
def with_union(x: int | list[Annotated[str, 'meta']]): ... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are all the other paths covered already? This test doesn't seem to cover the _GenericAlias branch in _strip_annotations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, other branches are reported to be covered by other tests in test_typing
somewhere.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Planning to merge in a few days (cc @gvanrossum).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LG
Thanks @sobolevn for the PR, and @JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9, 3.10. |
…31063) (cherry picked from commit 25c0b9d) Co-authored-by: Nikita Sobolev <[email protected]>
…31063) (cherry picked from commit 25c0b9d) Co-authored-by: Nikita Sobolev <[email protected]>
GH-31423 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
GH-31424 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch. |
(cherry picked from commit 25c0b9d) Co-authored-by: Nikita Sobolev <[email protected]>
It was not covered at all, proof:
It took me some time to understand how can I possibly reach it. After adding this test, we now cover this path. Proof:
https://bugs.python.org/issue46603