-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.9k
bpo-46711: increase timeout for test_logging::test_post_fork_child_no_deadlock
#31274
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ def lock_holder_thread_fn(): | |||
fork_happened__release_locks_and_end_thread.set() | |||
lock_holder_thread.join() | |||
|
|||
support.wait_process(pid, exitcode=0) | |||
support.wait_process(pid, exitcode=0, timeout=support.LONG_TIMEOUT) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please change the default timeout in wait_process() instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it might have some consequences 🤔
Right now SHORT_TIMEOUT
is just 30 seconds, while LONG_TIMEOUT
is 5 minutes.
It is a 10x increase.
Secondly, current docs state (https://docs.python.org/3/library/test.html#test.support.SHORT_TIMEOUT):
If a test using SHORT_TIMEOUT starts to fail randomly on slow buildbots, use LONG_TIMEOUT instead.
Initially I've followed this recommendation.
Do we have other tests that fail due to this timeout? Is it a global problem? You totally have more data than me on this problem.
Lastly, regrtest
has --timeout
, which we can change for slower runners.
If you think that we still should change the default, I have several questions:
- I guess we need to add
.. versionchanged:: 3.11
towait_process
docs and change the default value there - In this case we would have to recommend using
SHORT_TIMEOUT
if users expect some test to be fast, am I right? Or should we just remove this from the docs completely? - Should we change
--timeout=
flags that are used in the project somehow? https://cs.github.com/python/cpython?q=--timeout%3D
Oh. I forgot that I doubled the ASAN buildbot last week: python/buildmaster-config@5a37411
So SHORT_TIMEOUT should now be 60 seconds rather than 30 seconds. Why did https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/621/builds/466 fail at 52.5 seconds seconds in this case? Maybe my computation is wrong, or this build is older than the buildbot configuration change? |
cc @pablogsal |
I'm ok not changing the default. I'm convinced by @sobolevn comments 👍 |
I have no idea. I checked and the builder should have picked the change you talk about but maybe I have missed something :( |
I've added the information about the timeout to the error message. It can probably help the next time we have the same problem. |
@sobolevn No worries! I don't mind not getting credit. :) This was just a minor thing I noticed while working on #30310. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The Lib/test/support/init.py change is nice. I'm no longer sure that the Lib/test/test_logging.py change is correct. Maybe revert test_logging.py change?
Closes #31205
Thank you, @notarealdeveloper for noticing it!
However, I am not sure how to proceed here:
https://bugs.python.org/issue46711