Skip to content

gh-62824: add alias for iso-8859-8-i and -e to iso_8859_8 #32279

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

ringof
Copy link
Contributor

@ringof ringof commented Apr 3, 2022

Add aliases for iso-8859-8-i and iso-8859-8-e, which is the same as iso-8859-8

Co-authored-by: Ben Galin (bensws)
Source for this PR is derived from a patch submitted by bensws:
https://bugs.python.org/file35736/8859-8_aliases_and_test.patch

https://bugs.python.org/issue18624

Copy link
Contributor

@MaxwellDupre MaxwellDupre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ran 266 tests in 4.734s
OK (skipped=13)
Looks ok.

@arhadthedev arhadthedev added the type-feature A feature request or enhancement label Feb 13, 2023
@arhadthedev arhadthedev changed the title bpo-18624: add alias for iso-8859-8-i and -e to iso_8859_8 gh-62824: add alias for iso-8859-8-i and -e to iso_8859_8 Feb 13, 2023
@arhadthedev
Copy link
Member

@malemburg (as an encodings expert)

@basbloemsaat
Copy link
Contributor

Will this PR be accepted? Why is it still open?

@malemburg
Copy link
Member

Yes, I'd accept the PR, but before doing so, the conflicts will have to be resolved and the tests need to finish without errors.

@ambv
Copy link
Contributor

ambv commented May 20, 2025

Closing in favor of #134306.

@ringof
Copy link
Contributor Author

ringof commented May 20, 2025

Will this PR be accepted? Why is it still open?

Looks like you get quick results your way!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting core review type-feature A feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants