bpo-32206: Update pdb usage to include new module option #5111
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Good catch! There's a test case that checks the usage message is displayed as expected, so that will need to be updated appropriately (the purpose of that test is to check that |
ncoghlan
reviewed
Jan 6, 2018
Lib/pdb.py
Outdated
|
|
||
| Debug the Python program given by pyfile. | ||
| Debug the Python program given by pyfile or the module specified. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this will be clearer as two sentences: "Debug the Python program given by pyfile. Alternatively, an executable module or package to debug can be specified using the -m switch."
mariocj89
force-pushed
the
update_pdb_usage
branch
from
173b533 to
8ee3a1c
Compare
mariocj89
force-pushed
the
update_pdb_usage
branch
from
8ee3a1c to
7661d96
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updates the usage to include the new option. Sorry @ncoghlan, I totally missed it in the previous PR
If you think it is not important/not worth it I am happy to just close it.
https://bugs.python.org/issue32206