Skip to content

bpo-33027: Fix cgi.FieldStorage to handle Content-Disposition filename* with encoding according to RFC5987 #6027

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

bpo-33027: Fix cgi.FieldStorage to handle Content-Disposition filename* with encoding according to RFC5987 #6027

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

pawciobiel
Copy link

@pawciobiel pawciobiel commented Mar 8, 2018

filename* with encoding according to RFC5987.

https://bugs.python.org/issue33027

Also related to https://bugs.python.org/issue23434

filename* with encoding according to RFC5987.
@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately our records indicate you have not signed the CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!

@zware
Copy link
Member

zware commented Jan 19, 2020

Hi @pawciobiel! Unfortunately, this PR did not receive attention before Python 2.7 reached EOL on January 1st. As this does not appear to be a critical security issue, there is almost no chance that it will be accepted in this brief limbo window between end-of-support and the final 2.7.18 release, so I'm going to go ahead and close it.

Thanks for your contribution anyway, and I hope your next one is more fruitful!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants