Skip to content

gh-88513: [DOC] clarify shutil.copytree's dirs_exist_ok arg #91434

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2022

Conversation

jdevries3133
Copy link
Contributor

@jdevries3133 jdevries3133 commented Apr 11, 2022

  • add a paragraph to document this kwarg in detail
  • update docstring in the source accordingly
  • brief news.d entry

This is a duplicate of #26643. CI was failing on that PR because I messed
up that branch with a bunch of weirdly rebased commits.

* add a paragraph to document this kwarg in detail
* update docstring in the source accordingly
* brief news.d entry
@jdevries3133 jdevries3133 changed the title bpo-44347(doc): clarify shutil.copytree's dirs_exist_ok arg bpo-44347: [DOC] clarify shutil.copytree's dirs_exist_ok arg Apr 11, 2022
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra self-assigned this Apr 11, 2022
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label Apr 11, 2022
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra changed the title bpo-44347: [DOC] clarify shutil.copytree's dirs_exist_ok arg gh-88513: [DOC] clarify shutil.copytree's dirs_exist_ok arg Apr 11, 2022
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @jdevries3133 for the PR, and @JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @jdevries3133 for the PR, and @JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry @jdevries3133 and @JelleZijlstra, I had trouble checking out the 3.9 backport branch.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker f33e2c87a83917b5139d97fd8ef7cba7223ebef5 3.9

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes label Apr 12, 2022
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-91464 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2022
…-91434)

* add a paragraph to document this kwarg in detail
* update docstring in the source accordingly
(cherry picked from commit f33e2c8)

Co-authored-by: Jack DeVries <[email protected]>
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra added needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes and removed needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes labels Apr 12, 2022
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @jdevries3133 for the PR, and @JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes label Apr 12, 2022
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-91465 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

JelleZijlstra pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2022
…91465)

* add a paragraph to document this kwarg in detail
* update docstring in the source accordingly
(cherry picked from commit f33e2c8)

Co-authored-by: Jack DeVries <[email protected]>
ambv pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2022
…91464)

* add a paragraph to document this kwarg in detail
* update docstring in the source accordingly
(cherry picked from commit f33e2c8)

Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <[email protected]>
hello-adam pushed a commit to hello-adam/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2022
…-91434) (pythonGH-91465)

* add a paragraph to document this kwarg in detail
* update docstring in the source accordingly
(cherry picked from commit f33e2c8)

Co-authored-by: Jack DeVries <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants