Skip to content

stubgen: Fix valid type detection to allow pipe unions #18726

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2025

Conversation

chadrik
Copy link
Contributor

@chadrik chadrik commented Feb 24, 2025

stubgen has a regex which it uses to reject invalid types that are extracted from docstrings. It needed to be updated to support union shorthand: str | int.

@chadrik chadrik force-pushed the stubgen/is_valid_fix branch from b9745ef to 9174c67 Compare February 24, 2025 04:59
Copy link
Contributor

According to mypy_primer, this change doesn't affect type check results on a corpus of open source code. ✅

@chadrik
Copy link
Contributor Author

chadrik commented Feb 24, 2025

@hamdanal @JelleZijlstra This is ready for review.

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra merged commit 66dde14 into python:master Feb 24, 2025
19 checks passed
x612skm pushed a commit to x612skm/mypy-dev that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
<!-- If this pull request fixes an issue, add "Fixes #NNN" with the
issue number. -->

`stubgen` has a regex which it uses to reject invalid types that are
extracted from docstrings. It needed to be updated to support union
shorthand: `str | int`.

<!--
Checklist:
- Read the [Contributing
Guidelines](https://github.com/python/mypy/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- Add tests for all changed behaviour.
- If you can't add a test, please explain why and how you verified your
changes work.
- Make sure CI passes.
- Please do not force push to the PR once it has been reviewed.
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants