Skip to content

PEP 689: Semi-stable C API tier #2559

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 27, 2022
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions .github/CODEOWNERS
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -569,6 +569,7 @@ pep-0685.rst @brettcannon
pep-0686.rst @methane
pep-0687.rst @encukou
pep-0688.rst @jellezijlstra
pep-0689.rst @encukou
# ...
# pep-0754.txt
# ...
Expand Down
222 changes: 222 additions & 0 deletions pep-0689.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
PEP: 689
Title: Semi-stable C API tier
Author: Petr Viktorin <[email protected]>
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Requires: 523
Created: 22-Apr-2022
Python-Version: 3.11


Abstract
========

Some functions and types of the C-API are designated *semi-stable*,
meaning that they will not change in patch (bugfix/security) releases,
but may change between minor releases (e.g. between 3.11 and 3.12) without
deprecation warnings.


Motivation & Rationale
======================

The Python C-API is currently divided into `three tiers <https://devguide.python.org/c-api/>`__:

- Limited API, with high compatibility expectations
- Public API, which follows the :pep:`backwards compatibility policy
<387>`, and requires deprecation warnings before changes
- Private (internal) API, which can change at any time.

We need a tier between Public and Private to accommodate tools like
advanced debuggers and JIT compilers, which need access to CPython
internals but assume the C-API they use does not change in patch releases.


Setting Stability Expectations
------------------------------

Currently, there are no guarantees for the internal API -- that is, anything
that requires ``Py_BUILD_CORE`` or is named with a leading underscore.
This API can change without warning at any time, and code that uses it
is pinned to a specific build of Python.

However, in practice, even the internal API usually happens to be stable
in patch releases:

- Some CPython core developers take this as an an unwritten rule.
- Patch releases only contain bugfixes, which are unlikely to
change the API.

Semi-stable API will make the stability expectations more explicit.

It will also hopefully encourage existing users of the private API to
reach out to python-dev, so we can expose, standardize and test an API
for some of their use cases.


Reserving underscores for Private API
-------------------------------------

:pep:`523` introduced functions for use by debuggers and JIT compilers,
which are stable only across minor releases.
The functions names have leading underscores to suggest their limited
stability.

However, leading underscores usually mark *fully private* API.
CPython developers familiar with the “underscore means internal”
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
CPython developers familiar with the underscore means internal
CPython developers familiar with the "underscore means internal"

convention are unlikely to check if underscored functions they are
changing are documented and used outside CPython itself.

This proposal brings us a bit closer to reserving underscores
only for truly private, unstable, hands-off API.


Warning about API that is changed often
---------------------------------------

The ``PyCode_New()`` family is an example of functions that are
documented as unstable, and also often change in practice.

Moving it to the semi-stable tier will make its status obvious even
to people who don't read the docs carefully enough, and will make it
hard to use accidentally.


Changes during the Beta period
------------------------------

Since the API itself can change continuously up until Beta 1 (feature freeze)
of a minor version, major users of this API are unlikely to test
Alpha releases and provide feedback.
It is very difficult to determine what needs to be exposed as semi-stable.

Additions to the semi-stable tier will count as *stabilization*,
and will be allowed up to Release Candidate 1.


Specification
=============

Several functions and types (“APIs”) will be moved to a new *semi-stable* tier.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Several functions and types (APIs) will be moved to a new *semi-stable* tier.
Several functions and types ("APIs") will be moved to a new *semi-stable* tier.


They will be expected to stay stable across patch releases,
but may change or be removed without warning in minor releases (3.x.0),
including Alpha and Beta releases of 3.x.0.

When they change significantly, code that uses them should no longer compile
(e.g. arguments should be added/removed, or a function should be renamed,
but the semantic meaning of an argument should not change).

Their definitions will be moved to a new directory, ``Include/semistable/``,
and will be included from ``Python.h``.

From Python 3.12 on, these APIs will only be usable when the
``Py_USING_SEMI_STABLE_API`` macro is defined.
CPython will only define the macro for building CPython itself
(``Py_BUILD_CORE``).

To make transition to semi-stable API easier,
in Python 3.11 the APIs will be available without ``Py_USING_SEMI_STABLE_API``
defined. In this case, using them will generate a deprecation warning on
compilers that support ``Py_DEPRECATED``.

A similar deprecation period will be used when making more APIs semi-stable
in the future:

- When moving from public API, the deprecation period should follow Python's
backwards compatibility policy (currently, it should last at least
two releases).
- When moving from public API that is documented as unstable,
the deprecation period can only last one release.
- When moving from private API or adding new API, no deprecation period
is necessary.

Leading underscores will be removed from the names of the moved APIs.
The old underscored name of a renamed API will be available (as an alias
using ``#define``) at least until that API changes.

The semi-stable C-API tier and ``Py_USING_SEMI_STABLE_API`` will be documented,
and documentation of each semi-stable API will be updated.


Adjustments during Beta periods
-------------------------------

New APIs can be added to the semi-stable tier, and private APIs can be moved
to it, up to the first release candidate of a new minor version.
Consensus on the ``capi-sig`` or ``python-dev`` is needed in the Beta period.

In the Beta period, no API may be moved to more private tier, e.g.
what is public in Beta 1 must stay public until the final release.


Initial semi-stable API
-----------------------

The following API will initially be semi-stable.
The set may be adjusted for 3.11.

Code object constructors:

- ``PyCode_New()``
- ``PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs()``

Frame evaluation API (PEP 523):

- ``_PyFrameEvalFunction``
- ``_PyInterpreterState_GetEvalFrameFunc()``
- ``_PyInterpreterState_SetEvalFrameFunc()``
- ``_PyEval_RequestCodeExtraIndex()``
- ``_PyCode_GetExtra()``
- ``_PyCode_SetExtra()``
- ``struct _PyInterpreterFrame`` (as an incomplete, opaque struct)
- ``_PyFrame_GetFrameObject``
- ``PyEval_EvalFrameDefault``
(new function that calls ``_PyEval_EvalFrameDefault``, but takes
``PyFrameObject`` rather than ``_PyInterpreterFrame``)

(Leading underscores will be removed as mentioned above.)


Backwards Compatibility
=======================

The C API backwards compatibility story will be made clearer.


How to Teach This
=================

The changes affect advanced C programmers, who should consult the
updated reference documentation, devguide and/or What's New document·.


Reference Implementation
========================

https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/91744


Rejected Ideas
==============

It might be good to add a similar tier in the Python (not C) API,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like in practice this is already true for e.g. the ast module; I think Guido brought that up in the past too.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But like with CodeType, there's no warning outside the documentation. It's easy to miss this in a review.

e.g. for ``types.CodeType``.
However, the opt-in mechanism would need to be different (if any).
This is outside the scope of the PEP.


Open Issues
===========

- “Semi-stable” is not a perfect name.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sphinx will auto-convert the quotes.

Suggested change
- Semi-stable is not a perfect name.
- "Semi-stable" is not a perfect name.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But it accepts proper quotes as well, as far as I know.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't really like the name either, but haven't been able to think of anything better.


- The exact set of exposed API may change.


Copyright
=========

This document is placed in the public domain or under the
CC0-1.0-Universal license, whichever is more permissive.