Skip to content

PEP 772: Updates based on DPO thread and author discussion w/PSF representatives #4466

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

warsaw
Copy link
Member

@warsaw warsaw commented Jun 18, 2025

  • Nominees to the PC must now themselves be PSF members.
  • Take out mention of Bloc STAR and the detailed mechanics of the election process, in order to allow easier administration by the PSF staff. This lets them conduct elections using the same mechanics as Board elections, which currently is not Bloc STAR due to the unavailability of a suitable open source platform.
  • Describe "off cycle" elections since post-recall elections and the initial election will likely not align with the annual Board election.
  • Slight rewording of the admonition against sitting SC members from serving on the PC.
  • Describe what happens in partial (i.e. cohort) elections to ensure the "no two members from the same employer" rule.
  • Explicitly place the PC and its participants under the PSF CoC.
  • Explicitly mention that PSF voting members can opt out of PC elections independently of their choice to participate in Board elections.

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4466.org.readthedocs.build/

* Nominees to the PC must now themselves be PSF members.
* Take out mention of Bloc STAR and the detailed mechanics of the election process, in order to
  allow easier administration by the PSF staff.  This lets them conduct elections using the same
  mechanics as Board elections, which currently is not Bloc STAR due to the unavailability of a
  suitable open source platform.
* Describe "off cycle" elections since post-recall elections and the initial election will likely
  not align with the annual Board election.
* Slight rewording of the admonition against sitting SC members from serving on the PC.
* Describe what happens in partial (i.e. cohort) elections to ensure the "no two members from the
  same employer" rule.
* Explicitly place the PC and its participants under the PSF CoC.
* Explicitly mention that PSF voting members can opt out of PC elections independently of their
  choice to participate in Board elections.
@warsaw warsaw requested a review from pradyunsg as a code owner June 18, 2025 22:01
@warsaw warsaw self-assigned this Jun 18, 2025
@warsaw warsaw requested review from Copilot and pradyunsg and removed request for pradyunsg June 18, 2025 22:02
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR refines the Packaging Council election process in line with PSF guidelines, requiring nominees to be PSF members, using PSF Board election mechanics, and clarifying timing and policy details.

  • Nominees must be PSF members and elections use PSF Board procedures.
  • Added off-cycle election rules, cohort conflict resolution, and PSF Code of Conduct enforcement.
  • Reworded Steering Council ineligibility and updated PSF bylaws and CoC references.

@warsaw warsaw changed the title Updates based on DPO thread and author discussion w/PSF representatives PEP 772: Updates based on DPO thread and author discussion w/PSF representatives Jun 18, 2025
Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants