-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
PEP 772: Updates based on DPO thread and author discussion w/PSF representatives #4466
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
* Nominees to the PC must now themselves be PSF members. * Take out mention of Bloc STAR and the detailed mechanics of the election process, in order to allow easier administration by the PSF staff. This lets them conduct elections using the same mechanics as Board elections, which currently is not Bloc STAR due to the unavailability of a suitable open source platform. * Describe "off cycle" elections since post-recall elections and the initial election will likely not align with the annual Board election. * Slight rewording of the admonition against sitting SC members from serving on the PC. * Describe what happens in partial (i.e. cohort) elections to ensure the "no two members from the same employer" rule. * Explicitly place the PC and its participants under the PSF CoC. * Explicitly mention that PSF voting members can opt out of PC elections independently of their choice to participate in Board elections.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR refines the Packaging Council election process in line with PSF guidelines, requiring nominees to be PSF members, using PSF Board election mechanics, and clarifying timing and policy details.
- Nominees must be PSF members and elections use PSF Board procedures.
- Added off-cycle election rules, cohort conflict resolution, and PSF Code of Conduct enforcement.
- Reworded Steering Council ineligibility and updated PSF bylaws and CoC references.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The "PSF voting members" link at https://pep-previews--4466.org.readthedocs.build/pep-0772/#election-of-the-packaging-council is broken.
Perhaps it should link to https://www.python.org/psf/membership/ ?
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <[email protected]>
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4466.org.readthedocs.build/