Skip to content

Protocol naming guidelines #4229

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions CONTRIBUTING.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -285,6 +285,16 @@ are not sure whether exceptions are suppressed or not or if the
context manager is meant to be subclassed, pick `Optional[bool]`.
See https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/7214 for more details.

A few guidelines for protocol names below. In cases that don't fall
into any of those categories, use your best judgement.

* Use plain names for protocols that represent a clear concept
(e.g. `Iterator`, `Container`).
* Use `SupportsX` for protocols that provide callable methods (e.g.
`SupportsInt`, `SupportsRead`, `SupportsReadSeek`).
* Use `HasX` for protocols that have readable and/or writable attributes
or getter/setter methods (e.g. `HasItems`, `HasFileno`).

NOTE: there are stubs in this repository that don't conform to the
style described above. Fixing them is a great starting point for new
contributors.
Expand Down