-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 601
Arm backend: Add TOSA support for GroupNorm #10198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10198
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)As of commit bf10831 with merge base d4906e2 ( BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
Flaky behaviors on BI profile need to be investigated. |
Arm test fail Does it need a fix or rebase? |
3ef5cb2
to
f5d8911
Compare
Hi unfortunately it got a merge conflict and probably needs to be rebased after #10776 was merged. |
3f5ef3c
to
d69c2ec
Compare
Label |
Failure in test-arm-backend:
Do we need to mark |
This seem to again got "This branch has conflicts that must be resolved" :( |
- Decompose groupnorm into a sequence of supported operators - Have some numerical issues with BI profile - Fix docstring in decompose_layernorm_pass - Add "native_group_norm.default" to CUSTOM_EDGE_OPS Change-Id: I3f70388c12b8d9afd52876840b6c008a1b0bec4e Signed-off-by: Yufeng Shi <[email protected]>
83fe44f
to
2b18e66
Compare
Unrelated fail |
Change-Id: I3f70388c12b8d9afd52876840b6c008a1b0bec4e
cc @digantdesai @freddan80 @per @zingo @oscarandersson8218