Skip to content

Qualcomm AI Engine Direct - multi-method support #10584

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

haowhsu-quic
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

  • refactor to adopt multi-method change
  • framework patch to meet multi-method use case

Test plan

python backends/qualcomm/tests/test_qnn_delegate.py -k TestQNNQuantizedUtils.test_qnn_backend_multi_graphs -s $device_sn -b build-android -m SM8750

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 30, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10584

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 12 New Failures

As of commit 30883fd with merge base 48ad9f6 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Apr 30, 2025
@haowhsu-quic
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot label "release notes: qualcomm"

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: qualcomm Changes to the Qualcomm backend delegate label Apr 30, 2025
@@ -204,11 +205,38 @@ def _insert_lowered_submodule(
owning_graph_module = call_submodule_node.graph.owning_module
# call delegate args should only use user_inputs
call_delegate_args = []
# handle getitem node in multi-method scenario
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you share what issues you run into?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The scenario happens when there are common nodes shared by multiple delegated subgraphs (e.g. frequency sin/cos in sharded llama):
The example graph looks like below:
partitioned_0
When replacing submodule fused_qnn_1, the original name finding mechanism are trying to match between:

  • submodule_program.graph_signature.user_inputs: ('aten_mean_dim', 'aten_select_int', 'aten_select_int_1')
  • call_submodule_node.all_input_nodes: [aten_mean_dim, getitem_1, getitem_2]

Which makes getitem node dangling as following, since the names could not be correctly mapped:
partitioned_1
The patch here is trying to find the original graph with real output names and use index of getitem to have them in correct order.

And I think another issue is about validation in _unsafe_adjust_original_program. Since the partitioned sub graphs in multi-method scenario have already been turned into submodules (like first diagram). That behavior will make original_program._validate() fail in _unsafe_adjust_original_program.
This does not happen in single method lowering because sub graphs are turned into submodules one by one and replaced into executorch_call_delegate.
But I cannot find an appropriate way to pass official CI, could you give me some hint? thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. release notes: qualcomm Changes to the Qualcomm backend delegate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants