Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[New Operator] FusedRowwiseQuantizedSparseLengthsWeightedSumNode #2368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[New Operator] FusedRowwiseQuantizedSparseLengthsWeightedSumNode #2368
Changes from all commits
8c6229f
914d10f
7c40989
c00113f
23182ed
013791e
a7e795f
3f0740f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should be uint8?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We subtract
OFFSETSHIFT
to convert toint8_t
in our importer:glow/lib/Importer/Caffe2ModelLoader.cpp
Lines 1118 to 1127 in a64d64f
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we have such a type instead of plain
Int8ITy
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The biggest reason I wanted to explicitly differentiate between normal
Int8QTy
andInt8FusedQTy
is because the shape forInt8FusedQTy
is very strange -- it appears to be 8 columns wider than the actual data. This prevents accidental interpretation of fused scales/offsets as instead data, or viewing the input data as an otherwise normal tensor. And I didn't think there was a large downside to adding the new type.