-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.4k
Added invert bitwise operation to JIT #22324
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Oh whups, it seems like this is already being done (in the correct way here): #22320 :'( |
Actually, it doesn't change that much about this PR - I'll keep this open. It is blocked on it though. |
Updated to do it properly (I believe). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, still needs a test though. If you want to add it go ahead, if not we can hijack this PR in a couple days and do it ourselves.
I believe you are referencing wrong issues in the commit message - the first one (#25069) is an unrelated PR. Please remove the "Fixes" line for it. |
@driazati Added the test, there's some funkiness with |
@pytorchbot merge this please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yf225 is landing this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
@soumith mentioned that the failing internal test was a flaky test. |
@pytorchbot merge this please |
Summary: Fixes pytorch/pytorch#25360 Fixes pytorch/pytorch#22124 Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#22324 Differential Revision: D17140477 Pulled By: yf225 fbshipit-source-id: f42aec5e688fe079d9e79726b7a6c345da94ae2e
Fixes #25360
Fixes part of #22124