Skip to content

fix tree generation #24795

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

fix tree generation #24795

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kostmo
Copy link
Member

@kostmo kostmo commented Aug 16, 2019

No description provided.

@pytorchbot pytorchbot added the module: ci Related to continuous integration label Aug 16, 2019
@kostmo kostmo requested a review from jamesr66a August 16, 2019 22:21
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

This will give us diff signal for CPU-only builds with FBGEMM enabled, ensuring quantization gets timely signal

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

This will give us diff signal for CPU-only builds with FBGEMM enabled, ensuring quantization gets timely signal

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

This will give us diff signal for CPU-only builds with FBGEMM enabled, ensuring quantization gets timely signal

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

This will give us diff signal for CPU-only builds with FBGEMM enabled, ensuring quantization gets timely signal

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

This will give us diff signal for CPU-only builds with FBGEMM enabled, ensuring quantization gets timely signal

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

This will give us diff signal for CPU-only builds with FBGEMM enabled, ensuring quantization gets timely signal

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

This will give us diff signal for CPU-only builds with FBGEMM enabled, ensuring quantization gets timely signal

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

This will give us diff signal for CPU-only builds with FBGEMM enabled, ensuring quantization gets timely signal

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
jamesr66a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2019
Differential Revision: [D16862005](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D16862005)

Trusty is out of standard support, and a mismatch in the binutils version causes FBGEMM to not build in pytorch even with a compiler that supports AVX512. This makes it so we build all that stuff in the CPU CI jobs (and otherwise brings us into <current year>-3 instead of <current year>-5)

Built on top of #24795 (thanks @kostmo!)
@zou3519 zou3519 closed this Aug 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
module: ci Related to continuous integration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants