BounxingBoxes or BoundingBox

[NicolasHug]

Opening so we don't forget: we should align ClampBoundingBox and Sanitize BoundingBoxes to both use either plural or singular

[mpearce25]

Created a PR that

Standardize around singular "Box" as SanitizeBoundingBoxes was the only plural usage while the singular is used for all other classes.

lmk if it looks good

[pmeier]

I feel like the names are good as is. ClampBoundingBox can work with shapes (*, 4) (including singular (4,)) while SanitizeBoundingBoxes requires plural (N, 4).

[NicolasHug]

There's nothing that prevents SanitizeBoundingBoxes to work on a singular (4,) right? We just haven't implemended yet?

[pmeier]

There's nothing that prevents SanitizeBoundingBoxes to work on a singular (4,) right?

How would the shape look like if you sanitize a (4,) bounding box? If you remove all bounding boxes from (N, 4), it becomes (0, 4).

[NicolasHug]

Empty tensor?

[ins] In [2]: torch.tensor([]).shape
Out[2]: torch.Size([0])

[vfdev-5]

I would prefer to see everywhere BoundingBox so that there is no confusion in names between the subclass and the transforms

[NicolasHug]

We synced offline and keeping singular seems to be OK with everyone. This was addressed in #7313, thanks for your contribution @mpearce25