-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.1k
NOMRG Comments on prototype weights and model builders #4937
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 500f826 (more details on the Dr. CI page):
🕵️ 1 new failure recognized by patternsThe following CI failures do not appear to be due to upstream breakages:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the comments @NicolasHug.
I'm going to go ahead and implement many of the proposals and send a PR (I'll add you as reviewer).
I also added more comments/context to those that I require more clarifications. Let me know your thoughts.
@NicolasHug I believe we addressed all the comments on this PR and we can close it. If there are more, happy to make the needed changes. Let me know |
Thanks for all the discussions @datumbox @fmassa , we can safely close this one now. Latest discussions were tracked in #4652 (comment) |
Here are a bunch of comments on the new weights prototype. I'm opening this as a PR (not to be merged) instead of an issue as I think it will better help localize each discussion.
Overall I don't have any major comment or concern, except maybe for the somewhat BC breaking changes of some model building functions. I think we can work around BC for some of them, but not all.