Skip to content

Support (de)serializing Map and Set objects #483

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

bnoordhuis
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes: #482

Copy link
Contributor

@saghul saghul left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

goto fail;
if (bc_get_leb128(s, &prop_count))
goto fail;
for(i = 0; i < prop_count; i++) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
for(i = 0; i < prop_count; i++) {
for (i = 0; i < prop_count; i++) {

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm merely following the predominant style for for loops here (of the 533 for statements in quickjs.c, 66.8% are written this way.)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh!

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fabrice and i differ on this, I always put a space after if, for, while, switch, return with a value etc. Fabrice is less adamant about it :)

JS_FreeValue(ctx, rv);
JS_FreeValue(ctx, argv[0]);
JS_FreeValue(ctx, argv[1]);
argv[0] = JS_UNDEFINED;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this necessary since yoy are about to return?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, because it's inside a loop, otherwise we can end up double-freeing argv[1] on the next iteration.

(And I'm clearing argv[0] for clarity's sake, otherwise a casual reader will stop and think: "Why one and not the other?")

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great!

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis merged commit 3a58376 into quickjs-ng:master Aug 19, 2024
50 checks passed
@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis deleted the fix482 branch August 19, 2024 10:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

JS_WriteObject should support Map and Set
3 participants