add fix to hid-multitouch.c for Dell ST2220T #113

fpicarougne · 2012-09-17T07:46:58Z

I have backport a patch from the 3.4 kernel to correct the multitouch support of the Dell ST2220T screen (torvalds/linux@ed9d5c9)
Could you integer it to the raspberrypi official release of the kernel?
Source of the patch: http://pastebin.com/a2tkdtcc

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

licaon-kter · 2012-09-17T08:41:59Z

Any reason not to use Git do do the diff file?

fpicarougne · 2012-09-17T09:32:53Z

euh... none... just a habit
here the Git diff http://pastebin.com/ZSTXhchh

ajohnwaters · 2012-10-12T15:48:31Z

I'm really keen to use this patch in our local school - when will it be available via apt-get update please?

ajohnwaters · 2012-10-30T17:39:45Z

Did this make it into the new release (2012-10-28-wheezy-raspbian) on the main Raspberry Pi website?

asb · 2012-10-30T17:43:59Z

No, the patch hasn't yet been applied. In general we don't want to backport random patches and risk breakage, but the underlying code doesn't seem to have really changed from 3.2.x to 3.4 and of course fpicarougne has done the work of regenerating the patch and testing (I assume you've tested it?).

ajohnwaters · 2012-10-30T17:49:15Z

Thanks for your prompt response. No, I haven't tested it because I'm not
quite sure how you apply patches, but it sounds as if it does exactly what
I need. Can you point me in the right direction to learn how to apply a
kernel patch please?

John

On 30 October 2012 17:44, Alex Bradbury [email protected] wrote:

No, the patch hasn't yet been applied. In general we don't want to
backport random patches and risk breakage, but the underlying code doesn't
seem to have really changed from 3.2.x to 3.4 and of course fpicarougne has
done the work of regenerating the patch and testing (I assume you've tested
it?).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/113#issuecomment-9915632.

Best Regards,

John Waters

licaon-kter · 2012-10-30T23:45:28Z

step by step: https://help.github.com/articles/fork-a-repo

fpicarougne · 2012-10-31T08:13:43Z

I will post here the compiled module corresponding to the last kernel configuration. But next week because I'm not in my lab this week.

ajohnwaters · 2012-10-31T08:18:54Z

Thank you very much - most kind!

On 31 October 2012 08:13, Fabien Picarougne [email protected]:

I will post here the compiled module corresponding to the last kernel
configuration. But next week because I'm not in my lab this week.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/113#issuecomment-9936219.

Best Regards,

John Waters

ajohnwaters · 2012-11-06T09:27:44Z

Hi Fabien,

Just a gentle reminder about this as I would like to get the touch screen
working. When do you think it is possible to post the kernel?

John

On 31 October 2012 08:13, Fabien Picarougne [email protected]:

I will post here the compiled module corresponding to the last kernel
configuration. But next week because I'm not in my lab this week.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/113#issuecomment-9936219.

Best Regards,

John Waters

fpicarougne · 2012-11-06T10:17:59Z

You can find here (https://github.com/fpicarougne/raspberrypi-hid-multitouch) the module compiled with the last kernel available with apt-get upgrade.
Just replace the old file (/lib/modules/3.2.27+/kernel/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.ko)
If your touchscreen is already connected, before replacing the file, unload the module (modprobe -r hid-multitouch), then replace the file, and finally reload your module (modprobe hid-multitouch)

ajohnwaters · 2012-11-06T11:03:12Z

Brilliant !!! thank you so much Fabien - it worked first time. The school
in Bristol, UK will be so pleased.

John

On 6 November 2012 10:18, Fabien Picarougne [email protected]:

You can find here (
https://github.com/fpicarougne/raspberrypi-hid-multitouch) the module
compiled with the last kernel available with apt-get upgrade.
Just replace the old file
(/lib/modules/3.2.27+/kernel/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.ko)
If your touchscreen is already connected, before replacing the file,
unload the module (modprobe -r hid-multitouch), then replace the file, and
finally reload your module (modprobe hid-multitouch)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/113#issuecomment-10105337.

Best Regards,

John Waters

Dalphe · 2013-07-26T07:12:31Z

I would like to hear if there are anyone there have recompile this module for the latest debian for Raspberri version 3.6...

popcornmix · 2014-12-29T20:11:15Z

Closing issue since there has been no activity for more than 2 months. Reopen if needed.

devilfrmheaven · 2015-02-28T22:17:53Z

is there anyway I can get help with Dell S2240T :(

ajohnwaters · 2015-03-01T19:40:23Z

Sorry, I don't have the skills to fix this.

John

On 28 February 2015 at 22:18, devilfrmheaven [email protected]
wrote:

is there anyway I can get help with Dell S2240T :(

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#113 (comment).

frekele · 2015-12-05T00:07:32Z

Dell monitor S2240T and P2314T?

I have a P2314T monitor, I'm using with raspbian jessie, but it works only one touch, multi touch does not work.
I tried other distributions, but it did not work too.
Someone managed to make it work?

If instance directories are deleted while there are registered function triggers: # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances # mkdir test # echo "schedule:enable_event:sched:sched_switch" > test/set_ftrace_filter # rmdir test Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000008 Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000008 Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000021edde8 Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries Modules linked in: iptable_mangle ipt_MASQUERADE nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_conntrack nf_conntrack ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_tcpudp tun bridge stp llc kvm iptable_filter fuse binfmt_misc pseries_rng rng_core vmx_crypto ib_iser rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm ib_core libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq libcrc32c multipath virtio_net virtio_blk virtio_pci crc32c_vpmsum virtio_ring virtio CPU: 8 PID: 8694 Comm: rmdir Not tainted 4.11.0-nnr+ #113 task: c0000000bab52800 task.stack: c0000000baba0000 NIP: c0000000021edde8 LR: c0000000021f0590 CTR: c000000002119620 REGS: c0000000baba3870 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (4.11.0-nnr+) MSR: 8000000000009033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 22002422 XER: 20000000 CFAR: 00007fffabb725a8 DAR: 0000000000000008 DSISR: 40000000 SOFTE: 0 GPR00: c00000000220f750 c0000000baba3af0 c000000003157e00 0000000000000000 GPR04: 0000000000000040 00000000000000eb 0000000000000040 0000000000000000 GPR08: 0000000000000000 0000000000000113 0000000000000000 c00000000305db98 GPR12: c000000002119620 c00000000fd42c00 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 c0000000bab52e90 0000000000000000 GPR24: 0000000000000000 00000000000000eb 0000000000000040 c0000000baba3bb0 GPR28: c00000009cb06eb0 c0000000bab52800 c00000009cb06eb0 c0000000baba3bb0 NIP [c0000000021edde8] ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x8/0x4e0 LR [c0000000021f0590] trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve+0xe0/0x1a0 Call Trace: [c0000000baba3af0] [c0000000021f96c8] trace_event_buffer_commit+0x1b8/0x280 (unreliable) [c0000000baba3b60] [c00000000220f750] trace_event_buffer_reserve+0x80/0xd0 [c0000000baba3b90] [c0000000021196b8] trace_event_raw_event_sched_switch+0x98/0x180 [c0000000baba3c10] [c0000000029d9980] __schedule+0x6e0/0xab0 [c0000000baba3ce0] [c000000002122230] do_task_dead+0x70/0xc0 [c0000000baba3d10] [c0000000020ea9c8] do_exit+0x828/0xd00 [c0000000baba3dd0] [c0000000020eaf70] do_group_exit+0x60/0x100 [c0000000baba3e10] [c0000000020eb034] SyS_exit_group+0x24/0x30 [c0000000baba3e30] [c00000000200bcec] system_call+0x38/0x54 Instruction dump: 60000000 60420000 7d244b78 7f63db78 4bffaa09 393efff8 793e002 39200000 4bfffecc 60420000 3c4c00f7 3842a020 <81230008> 2f890000 409e02f0 a14d0008 ---[ end trace b917b8985d0e650b ]--- Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000008 Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000021edde8 Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000008 Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000021edde8 Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000021edde8 To address this, let's clear all registered function probes before deleting the ftrace instance. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c5f1ca624043690bd94642bb6bffd3f2fc504035.1494956770.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]>

commit 77f8269 upstream. When we do the following test, we got oops in ipmi_msghandler driver while((1)) do service ipmievd restart & service ipmievd restart done --------------------------------------------------------------- [ 294.230186] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000803fea6ea008 [ 294.230188] Mem abort info: [ 294.230190] ESR = 0x96000004 [ 294.230191] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 294.230193] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 294.230194] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 294.230195] Data abort info: [ 294.230196] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 [ 294.230197] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 294.230199] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 00000000a1c1b75a [ 294.230201] [0000803fea6ea008] pgd=0000000000000000 [ 294.230204] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [raspberrypi#1] SMP [ 294.235211] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 isofs rpcrdma ib_iser ib_srpt target_core_mod ib_srp scsi_transport_srp ib_ipoib rdma_ucm ib_umad rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce sha2_ce ses sha256_arm64 sha1_ce hibmc_drm hisi_sas_v2_hw enclosure sg hisi_sas_main sbsa_gwdt ip_tables mlx5_ib ib_uverbs marvell ib_core mlx5_core ixgbe ipmi_si mdio hns_dsaf ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler hns_enet_drv hns_mdio [ 294.277745] CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.0.0-rc2+ raspberrypi#113 [ 294.285511] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 /BC11SPCD, BIOS 1.37 11/21/2017 [ 294.292835] pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO) [ 294.297695] pc : __srcu_read_lock+0x38/0x58 [ 294.301940] lr : acquire_ipmi_user+0x2c/0x70 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.307853] sp : ffff00001001bc80 [ 294.311208] x29: ffff00001001bc80 x28: ffff0000117e5000 [ 294.316594] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: dead000000000100 [ 294.321980] x25: dead000000000200 x24: ffff803f6bd06800 [ 294.327366] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000 [ 294.332752] x21: ffff00001001bd04 x20: ffff80df33d19018 [ 294.338137] x19: ffff80df33d19018 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 294.343523] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 294.348908] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000002 [ 294.354293] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 294.359679] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000100000 [ 294.365065] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000004 [ 294.370451] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff80df34558678 [ 294.375836] x5 : 000000000000000c x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 294.381221] x3 : 0000000000000001 x2 : 0000803fea6ea000 [ 294.386607] x1 : 0000803fea6ea008 x0 : 0000000000000001 [ 294.391994] Process swapper/3 (pid: 0, stack limit = 0x0000000083087293) [ 294.398791] Call trace: [ 294.401266] __srcu_read_lock+0x38/0x58 [ 294.405154] acquire_ipmi_user+0x2c/0x70 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.410716] deliver_response+0x80/0xf8 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.416189] deliver_local_response+0x28/0x68 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.422193] handle_one_recv_msg+0x158/0xcf8 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.432050] handle_new_recv_msgs+0xc0/0x210 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.441984] smi_recv_tasklet+0x8c/0x158 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.451618] tasklet_action_common.isra.5+0x88/0x138 [ 294.460661] tasklet_action+0x2c/0x38 [ 294.468191] __do_softirq+0x120/0x2f8 [ 294.475561] irq_exit+0x134/0x140 [ 294.482445] __handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0xc0 [ 294.489954] gic_handle_irq+0xb8/0x178 [ 294.497037] el1_irq+0xb0/0x140 [ 294.503381] arch_cpu_idle+0x34/0x1a8 [ 294.510096] do_idle+0x1d4/0x290 [ 294.516322] cpu_startup_entry+0x28/0x30 [ 294.523230] secondary_start_kernel+0x184/0x1d0 [ 294.530657] Code: d538d082 d2800023 8b010c81 8b020021 (c85f7c25) [ 294.539746] ---[ end trace 8a7a880dee570b29 ]--- [ 294.547341] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt [ 294.556837] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [ 294.563996] Kernel Offset: disabled [ 294.570515] CPU features: 0x002,21006008 [ 294.577638] Memory Limit: none [ 294.587178] Starting crashdump kernel... [ 294.594314] Bye! Because the user->release_barrier.rda is freed in ipmi_destroy_user(), but the refcount is not zero, when acquire_ipmi_user() uses user->release_barrier.rda in __srcu_read_lock(), it causes oops. Fix this by calling cleanup_srcu_struct() when the refcount is zero. Fixes: e86ee2d ("ipmi: Rework locking and shutdown for hot remove") Cc: [email protected] # 4.18 Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

When we do the following test, we got oops in ipmi_msghandler driver while((1)) do service ipmievd restart & service ipmievd restart done --------------------------------------------------------------- [ 294.230186] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000803fea6ea008 [ 294.230188] Mem abort info: [ 294.230190] ESR = 0x96000004 [ 294.230191] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 294.230193] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 294.230194] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 294.230195] Data abort info: [ 294.230196] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 [ 294.230197] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 294.230199] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 00000000a1c1b75a [ 294.230201] [0000803fea6ea008] pgd=0000000000000000 [ 294.230204] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP [ 294.235211] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 isofs rpcrdma ib_iser ib_srpt target_core_mod ib_srp scsi_transport_srp ib_ipoib rdma_ucm ib_umad rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce sha2_ce ses sha256_arm64 sha1_ce hibmc_drm hisi_sas_v2_hw enclosure sg hisi_sas_main sbsa_gwdt ip_tables mlx5_ib ib_uverbs marvell ib_core mlx5_core ixgbe ipmi_si mdio hns_dsaf ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler hns_enet_drv hns_mdio [ 294.277745] CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.0.0-rc2+ #113 [ 294.285511] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 /BC11SPCD, BIOS 1.37 11/21/2017 [ 294.292835] pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO) [ 294.297695] pc : __srcu_read_lock+0x38/0x58 [ 294.301940] lr : acquire_ipmi_user+0x2c/0x70 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.307853] sp : ffff00001001bc80 [ 294.311208] x29: ffff00001001bc80 x28: ffff0000117e5000 [ 294.316594] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: dead000000000100 [ 294.321980] x25: dead000000000200 x24: ffff803f6bd06800 [ 294.327366] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000 [ 294.332752] x21: ffff00001001bd04 x20: ffff80df33d19018 [ 294.338137] x19: ffff80df33d19018 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 294.343523] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 294.348908] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000002 [ 294.354293] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 294.359679] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000100000 [ 294.365065] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000004 [ 294.370451] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff80df34558678 [ 294.375836] x5 : 000000000000000c x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 294.381221] x3 : 0000000000000001 x2 : 0000803fea6ea000 [ 294.386607] x1 : 0000803fea6ea008 x0 : 0000000000000001 [ 294.391994] Process swapper/3 (pid: 0, stack limit = 0x0000000083087293) [ 294.398791] Call trace: [ 294.401266] __srcu_read_lock+0x38/0x58 [ 294.405154] acquire_ipmi_user+0x2c/0x70 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.410716] deliver_response+0x80/0xf8 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.416189] deliver_local_response+0x28/0x68 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.422193] handle_one_recv_msg+0x158/0xcf8 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.432050] handle_new_recv_msgs+0xc0/0x210 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.441984] smi_recv_tasklet+0x8c/0x158 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.451618] tasklet_action_common.isra.5+0x88/0x138 [ 294.460661] tasklet_action+0x2c/0x38 [ 294.468191] __do_softirq+0x120/0x2f8 [ 294.475561] irq_exit+0x134/0x140 [ 294.482445] __handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0xc0 [ 294.489954] gic_handle_irq+0xb8/0x178 [ 294.497037] el1_irq+0xb0/0x140 [ 294.503381] arch_cpu_idle+0x34/0x1a8 [ 294.510096] do_idle+0x1d4/0x290 [ 294.516322] cpu_startup_entry+0x28/0x30 [ 294.523230] secondary_start_kernel+0x184/0x1d0 [ 294.530657] Code: d538d082 d2800023 8b010c81 8b020021 (c85f7c25) [ 294.539746] ---[ end trace 8a7a880dee570b29 ]--- [ 294.547341] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt [ 294.556837] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [ 294.563996] Kernel Offset: disabled [ 294.570515] CPU features: 0x002,21006008 [ 294.577638] Memory Limit: none [ 294.587178] Starting crashdump kernel... [ 294.594314] Bye! Because the user->release_barrier.rda is freed in ipmi_destroy_user(), but the refcount is not zero, when acquire_ipmi_user() uses user->release_barrier.rda in __srcu_read_lock(), it causes oops. Fix this by calling cleanup_srcu_struct() when the refcount is zero. Fixes: e86ee2d ("ipmi: Rework locking and shutdown for hot remove") Cc: [email protected] # 4.18 Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <[email protected]>

commit 77f8269 upstream. When we do the following test, we got oops in ipmi_msghandler driver while((1)) do service ipmievd restart & service ipmievd restart done --------------------------------------------------------------- [ 294.230186] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000803fea6ea008 [ 294.230188] Mem abort info: [ 294.230190] ESR = 0x96000004 [ 294.230191] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 294.230193] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 294.230194] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 294.230195] Data abort info: [ 294.230196] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 [ 294.230197] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 294.230199] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 00000000a1c1b75a [ 294.230201] [0000803fea6ea008] pgd=0000000000000000 [ 294.230204] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP [ 294.235211] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 isofs rpcrdma ib_iser ib_srpt target_core_mod ib_srp scsi_transport_srp ib_ipoib rdma_ucm ib_umad rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce sha2_ce ses sha256_arm64 sha1_ce hibmc_drm hisi_sas_v2_hw enclosure sg hisi_sas_main sbsa_gwdt ip_tables mlx5_ib ib_uverbs marvell ib_core mlx5_core ixgbe ipmi_si mdio hns_dsaf ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler hns_enet_drv hns_mdio [ 294.277745] CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.0.0-rc2+ #113 [ 294.285511] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 /BC11SPCD, BIOS 1.37 11/21/2017 [ 294.292835] pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO) [ 294.297695] pc : __srcu_read_lock+0x38/0x58 [ 294.301940] lr : acquire_ipmi_user+0x2c/0x70 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.307853] sp : ffff00001001bc80 [ 294.311208] x29: ffff00001001bc80 x28: ffff0000117e5000 [ 294.316594] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: dead000000000100 [ 294.321980] x25: dead000000000200 x24: ffff803f6bd06800 [ 294.327366] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000 [ 294.332752] x21: ffff00001001bd04 x20: ffff80df33d19018 [ 294.338137] x19: ffff80df33d19018 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 294.343523] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 294.348908] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000002 [ 294.354293] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 294.359679] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000100000 [ 294.365065] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000004 [ 294.370451] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff80df34558678 [ 294.375836] x5 : 000000000000000c x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 294.381221] x3 : 0000000000000001 x2 : 0000803fea6ea000 [ 294.386607] x1 : 0000803fea6ea008 x0 : 0000000000000001 [ 294.391994] Process swapper/3 (pid: 0, stack limit = 0x0000000083087293) [ 294.398791] Call trace: [ 294.401266] __srcu_read_lock+0x38/0x58 [ 294.405154] acquire_ipmi_user+0x2c/0x70 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.410716] deliver_response+0x80/0xf8 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.416189] deliver_local_response+0x28/0x68 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.422193] handle_one_recv_msg+0x158/0xcf8 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.432050] handle_new_recv_msgs+0xc0/0x210 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.441984] smi_recv_tasklet+0x8c/0x158 [ipmi_msghandler] [ 294.451618] tasklet_action_common.isra.5+0x88/0x138 [ 294.460661] tasklet_action+0x2c/0x38 [ 294.468191] __do_softirq+0x120/0x2f8 [ 294.475561] irq_exit+0x134/0x140 [ 294.482445] __handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0xc0 [ 294.489954] gic_handle_irq+0xb8/0x178 [ 294.497037] el1_irq+0xb0/0x140 [ 294.503381] arch_cpu_idle+0x34/0x1a8 [ 294.510096] do_idle+0x1d4/0x290 [ 294.516322] cpu_startup_entry+0x28/0x30 [ 294.523230] secondary_start_kernel+0x184/0x1d0 [ 294.530657] Code: d538d082 d2800023 8b010c81 8b020021 (c85f7c25) [ 294.539746] ---[ end trace 8a7a880dee570b29 ]--- [ 294.547341] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt [ 294.556837] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [ 294.563996] Kernel Offset: disabled [ 294.570515] CPU features: 0x002,21006008 [ 294.577638] Memory Limit: none [ 294.587178] Starting crashdump kernel... [ 294.594314] Bye! Because the user->release_barrier.rda is freed in ipmi_destroy_user(), but the refcount is not zero, when acquire_ipmi_user() uses user->release_barrier.rda in __srcu_read_lock(), it causes oops. Fix this by calling cleanup_srcu_struct() when the refcount is zero. Fixes: e86ee2d ("ipmi: Rework locking and shutdown for hot remove") Cc: [email protected] # 4.18 Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

…supported commit f3e0269 upstream. This patch fixes warning seen when BLK-MQ is enabled and hardware does not support MQ. This will result into driver requesting MSIx vectors which are equal or less than pre_desc via PCI IRQ Affinity infrastructure. [ 19.746300] qla2xxx [0000:00:00.0]-0005: : QLogic Fibre Channel HBA Driver: 10.00.00.12-k. [ 19.746599] qla2xxx [0000:02:00.0]-001d: : Found an ISP2432 irq 18 iobase 0x(____ptrval____). [ 20.203186] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 20.203306] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 268 at drivers/pci/msi.c:1273 pci_irq_get_affinity+0xf4/0x120 [ 20.203481] Modules linked in: tg3 ptp qla2xxx(+) pps_core sg libphy scsi_transport_fc flash loop autofs4 [ 20.203700] CPU: 8 PID: 268 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.0.0-rc5-00358-gdf3865f #113 [ 20.203830] Call Trace: [ 20.203933] [0000000000461bb0] __warn+0xb0/0xe0 [ 20.204090] [00000000006c8f34] pci_irq_get_affinity+0xf4/0x120 [ 20.204219] [000000000068c764] blk_mq_pci_map_queues+0x24/0x120 [ 20.204396] [00000000007162f4] scsi_map_queues+0x14/0x40 [ 20.204626] [0000000000673654] blk_mq_update_queue_map+0x94/0xe0 [ 20.204698] [0000000000676ce0] blk_mq_alloc_tag_set+0x120/0x300 [ 20.204869] [000000000071077c] scsi_add_host_with_dma+0x7c/0x300 [ 20.205419] [00000000100ead54] qla2x00_probe_one+0x19d4/0x2640 [qla2xxx] [ 20.205621] [00000000006b3c88] pci_device_probe+0xc8/0x160 [ 20.205697] [0000000000701c0c] really_probe+0x1ac/0x2e0 [ 20.205770] [0000000000701f90] driver_probe_device+0x50/0x100 [ 20.205843] [0000000000702134] __driver_attach+0xf4/0x120 [ 20.205913] [0000000000700644] bus_for_each_dev+0x44/0x80 [ 20.206081] [0000000000700c98] bus_add_driver+0x198/0x220 [ 20.206300] [0000000000702950] driver_register+0x70/0x120 [ 20.206582] [0000000010248224] qla2x00_module_init+0x224/0x284 [qla2xxx] [ 20.206857] ---[ end trace b1de7a3f79fab2c2 ]--- The fix is to check if the hardware does not have Multi Queue capabiltiy, use pci_alloc_irq_vectors() call instead of pci_alloc_irq_affinity(). Fixes: f664a3c ("scsi: kill off the legacy IO path") Cc: [email protected] #4.19 Signed-off-by: Giridhar Malavali <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Madhani <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 934bda5 ] While developing KASAN for 64-bit book3s, I hit the following stack over-read. It occurs because the hypercall to put characters onto the terminal takes 2 longs (128 bits/16 bytes) of characters at a time, and so hvc_put_chars() would unconditionally copy 16 bytes from the argument buffer, regardless of supplied length. However, udbg_hvc_putc() can call hvc_put_chars() with a single-byte buffer, leading to the error. ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in hvc_put_chars+0xdc/0x110 Read of size 8 at addr c0000000023e7a90 by task swapper/0 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.2.0-rc2-next-20190528-02824-g048a6ab4835b #113 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x104/0x154 (unreliable) print_address_description+0xa0/0x30c __kasan_report+0x20c/0x224 kasan_report+0x18/0x30 __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x24/0x40 hvc_put_chars+0xdc/0x110 hvterm_raw_put_chars+0x9c/0x110 udbg_hvc_putc+0x154/0x200 udbg_write+0xf0/0x240 console_unlock+0x868/0xd30 register_console+0x970/0xe90 register_early_udbg_console+0xf8/0x114 setup_arch+0x108/0x790 start_kernel+0x104/0x784 start_here_common+0x1c/0x534 Memory state around the buggy address: c0000000023e7980: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c0000000023e7a00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 >c0000000023e7a80: f1 f1 01 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ^ c0000000023e7b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c0000000023e7b80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ================================================================== Document that a 16-byte buffer is requred, and provide it in udbg. Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 934bda5 ] While developing KASAN for 64-bit book3s, I hit the following stack over-read. It occurs because the hypercall to put characters onto the terminal takes 2 longs (128 bits/16 bytes) of characters at a time, and so hvc_put_chars() would unconditionally copy 16 bytes from the argument buffer, regardless of supplied length. However, udbg_hvc_putc() can call hvc_put_chars() with a single-byte buffer, leading to the error. ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in hvc_put_chars+0xdc/0x110 Read of size 8 at addr c0000000023e7a90 by task swapper/0 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.2.0-rc2-next-20190528-02824-g048a6ab4835b raspberrypi#113 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x104/0x154 (unreliable) print_address_description+0xa0/0x30c __kasan_report+0x20c/0x224 kasan_report+0x18/0x30 __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x24/0x40 hvc_put_chars+0xdc/0x110 hvterm_raw_put_chars+0x9c/0x110 udbg_hvc_putc+0x154/0x200 udbg_write+0xf0/0x240 console_unlock+0x868/0xd30 register_console+0x970/0xe90 register_early_udbg_console+0xf8/0x114 setup_arch+0x108/0x790 start_kernel+0x104/0x784 start_here_common+0x1c/0x534 Memory state around the buggy address: c0000000023e7980: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c0000000023e7a00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 >c0000000023e7a80: f1 f1 01 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ^ c0000000023e7b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c0000000023e7b80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ================================================================== Document that a 16-byte buffer is requred, and provide it in udbg. Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

kvm->arch.arm_pmu is set when userspace attempts to set the first PMU attribute. As certain attributes are mandatory, arm_pmu ends up always being set to a valid arm_pmu, otherwise KVM will refuse to run the VCPU. However, this only happens if the VCPU has the PMU feature. If the VCPU doesn't have the feature bit set, kvm->arch.arm_pmu will be left uninitialized and equal to NULL. KVM doesn't do ID register emulation for 32-bit guests and accesses to the PMU registers aren't gated by the pmu_visibility() function. This is done to prevent injecting unexpected undefined exceptions in guests which have detected the presence of a hardware PMU. But even though the VCPU feature is missing, KVM still attempts to emulate certain aspects of the PMU when PMU registers are accessed. This leads to a NULL pointer dereference like this one, which happens on an odroid-c4 board when running the kvm-unit-tests pmu-cycle-counter test with kvmtool and without the PMU feature being set: [ 454.402699] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000150 [ 454.405865] Mem abort info: [ 454.408596] ESR = 0x96000004 [ 454.411638] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 454.416901] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 454.419909] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 454.423010] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 454.427841] Data abort info: [ 454.430687] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 [ 454.434484] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 454.437404] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000000c924000 [ 454.443800] [0000000000000150] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 454.450528] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 454.456036] Modules linked in: [ 454.459053] CPU: 1 PID: 267 Comm: kvm-vcpu-0 Not tainted 5.18.0-rc4 #113 [ 454.465697] Hardware name: Hardkernel ODROID-C4 (DT) [ 454.470612] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 454.477512] pc : kvm_pmu_event_mask.isra.0+0x14/0x74 [ 454.482427] lr : kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type+0x2c/0x80 [ 454.487775] sp : ffff80000a9839c0 [ 454.491050] x29: ffff80000a9839c0 x28: ffff000000a83a00 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 454.498127] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff00000a510000 [ 454.505198] x23: ffff000000a83a00 x22: ffff000003b01000 x21: 0000000000000000 [ 454.512271] x20: 000000000000001f x19: 00000000000003ff x18: 0000000000000000 [ 454.519343] x17: 000000008003fe98 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000 [ 454.526416] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 454.533489] x11: 000000008003fdbc x10: 0000000000009d20 x9 : 000000000000001b [ 454.540561] x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000d00 x6 : 0000000000009d00 [ 454.547633] x5 : 0000000000000037 x4 : 0000000000009d00 x3 : 0d09000000000000 [ 454.554705] x2 : 000000000000001f x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 454.561779] Call trace: [ 454.564191] kvm_pmu_event_mask.isra.0+0x14/0x74 [ 454.568764] kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type+0x2c/0x80 [ 454.573766] access_pmu_evtyper+0x128/0x170 [ 454.577905] perform_access+0x34/0x80 [ 454.581527] kvm_handle_cp_32+0x13c/0x160 [ 454.585495] kvm_handle_cp15_32+0x1c/0x30 [ 454.589462] handle_exit+0x70/0x180 [ 454.592912] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x1c4/0x5e0 [ 454.597485] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x23c/0x940 [ 454.601280] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xa8/0xf0 [ 454.605160] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114 [ 454.608869] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xd4/0xfc [ 454.613527] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x90 [ 454.616803] el0_svc+0x34/0xb0 [ 454.619822] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa4/0x130 [ 454.624049] el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 [ 454.627675] Code: a9be7bfd 910003fd f9000bf3 52807ff3 (b9415001) [ 454.633714] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- In this particular case, Linux hasn't detected the presence of a hardware PMU because the PMU node is missing from the DTB, so userspace would have been unable to set the VCPU PMU feature even if it attempted it. What happens is that the 32-bit guest reads ID_DFR0, which advertises the presence of the PMU, and when it tries to program a counter, it triggers the NULL pointer dereference because kvm->arch.arm_pmu is NULL. kvm-arch.arm_pmu was introduced by commit 46b1878 ("KVM: arm64: Keep a per-VM pointer to the default PMU"). Until that commit, this error would be triggered instead: [ 73.388140] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 73.388189] Unknown PMU version 0 [ 73.390420] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 264 at arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c:36 kvm_pmu_event_mask.isra.0+0x6c/0x74 [ 73.399821] Modules linked in: [ 73.402835] CPU: 1 PID: 264 Comm: kvm-vcpu-0 Not tainted 5.17.0 #114 [ 73.409132] Hardware name: Hardkernel ODROID-C4 (DT) [ 73.414048] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 73.420948] pc : kvm_pmu_event_mask.isra.0+0x6c/0x74 [ 73.425863] lr : kvm_pmu_event_mask.isra.0+0x6c/0x74 [ 73.430779] sp : ffff80000a8db9b0 [ 73.434055] x29: ffff80000a8db9b0 x28: ffff000000dbaac0 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 73.441131] x26: ffff000000dbaac0 x25: 00000000c600000d x24: 0000000000180720 [ 73.448203] x23: ffff800009ffbe10 x22: ffff00000b612000 x21: 0000000000000000 [ 73.455276] x20: 000000000000001f x19: 0000000000000000 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 73.462348] x17: 000000008003fe98 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0720072007200720 [ 73.469420] x14: 0720072007200720 x13: ffff800009d32488 x12: 00000000000004e6 [ 73.476493] x11: 00000000000001a2 x10: ffff800009d32488 x9 : ffff800009d32488 [ 73.483565] x8 : 00000000ffffefff x7 : ffff800009d8a488 x6 : ffff800009d8a488 [ 73.490638] x5 : ffff0000f461a9d8 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 [ 73.497710] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff000000dbaac0 [ 73.504784] Call trace: [ 73.507195] kvm_pmu_event_mask.isra.0+0x6c/0x74 [ 73.511768] kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type+0x2c/0x80 [ 73.516770] access_pmu_evtyper+0x128/0x16c [ 73.520910] perform_access+0x34/0x80 [ 73.524532] kvm_handle_cp_32+0x13c/0x160 [ 73.528500] kvm_handle_cp15_32+0x1c/0x30 [ 73.532467] handle_exit+0x70/0x180 [ 73.535917] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x20c/0x6e0 [ 73.540489] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2b8/0x9e0 [ 73.544283] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xa8/0xf0 [ 73.548165] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114 [ 73.551874] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xd4/0xfc [ 73.556531] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x90 [ 73.559808] el0_svc+0x28/0x80 [ 73.562826] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa4/0x130 [ 73.567054] el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 [ 73.570676] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 73.575382] kvm: pmu event creation failed -2 The root cause remains the same: kvm->arch.pmuver was never set to something sensible because the VCPU feature itself was never set. The odroid-c4 is somewhat of a special case, because Linux doesn't probe the PMU. But the above errors can easily be reproduced on any hardware, with or without a PMU driver, as long as userspace doesn't set the PMU feature. Work around the fact that KVM advertises a PMU even when the VCPU feature is not set by gating all PMU emulation on the feature. The guest can still access the registers without KVM injecting an undefined exception. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

scx: Sync schedulers from SCX v0.1.5 (74923c6cdbc3)

notro mentioned this issue Dec 29, 2014

PR and issue list purging? #751

Closed

popcornmix closed this as completed Dec 29, 2014

0lxb pushed a commit to 0lxb/rpi_linux that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2024

Merge pull request raspberrypi#113 from sched-ext/htejun

f4dc571

scx: Sync schedulers from SCX v0.1.5 (74923c6cdbc3)

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

add fix to hid-multitouch.c for Dell ST2220T #113

add fix to hid-multitouch.c for Dell ST2220T #113

fpicarougne commented Sep 17, 2012

licaon-kter commented Sep 17, 2012

fpicarougne commented Sep 17, 2012

ajohnwaters commented Oct 12, 2012

ajohnwaters commented Oct 30, 2012

asb commented Oct 30, 2012

ajohnwaters commented Oct 30, 2012

licaon-kter commented Oct 30, 2012

fpicarougne commented Oct 31, 2012

ajohnwaters commented Oct 31, 2012

ajohnwaters commented Nov 6, 2012

fpicarougne commented Nov 6, 2012

ajohnwaters commented Nov 6, 2012

Dalphe commented Jul 26, 2013

popcornmix commented Dec 29, 2014

devilfrmheaven commented Feb 28, 2015

ajohnwaters commented Mar 1, 2015

frekele commented Dec 5, 2015

add fix to hid-multitouch.c for Dell ST2220T #113

add fix to hid-multitouch.c for Dell ST2220T #113

Comments

fpicarougne commented Sep 17, 2012

licaon-kter commented Sep 17, 2012

fpicarougne commented Sep 17, 2012

ajohnwaters commented Oct 12, 2012

ajohnwaters commented Oct 30, 2012

asb commented Oct 30, 2012

ajohnwaters commented Oct 30, 2012

licaon-kter commented Oct 30, 2012

fpicarougne commented Oct 31, 2012

ajohnwaters commented Oct 31, 2012

ajohnwaters commented Nov 6, 2012

fpicarougne commented Nov 6, 2012

ajohnwaters commented Nov 6, 2012

Dalphe commented Jul 26, 2013

popcornmix commented Dec 29, 2014

devilfrmheaven commented Feb 28, 2015

ajohnwaters commented Mar 1, 2015

frekele commented Dec 5, 2015