1-Wire: crc=NO and w1_slave No such file or directory during high ethernet throughput #252
Comments
|
This will have been significantly improved through the use of tasklet-context USB URB completions, which eliminates a significant source of hard-IRQ latency. Additionally, smsc95xx.turbo_mode=N has been a default for a while which also seems to help with IRQ latency. Reply if this is still an issue. |
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2017
printk_ratelimit() invokes ___ratelimit() which may invoke a normal printk() (pr_warn() in this particular case) to warn about suppressed output. Given that printk_ratelimit() may be called from anywhere, that pr_warn() is dangerous - it may end up deadlocking the system. Fix ___ratelimit() by using deferred printk(). Sasha reported the following lockdep error: : Unregister pv shared memory for cpu 8 : select_fallback_rq: 3 callbacks suppressed : process 8583 (trinity-c78) no longer affine to cpu8 : : ====================================================== : WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected : 4.14.0-rc2-next-20170927+ #252 Not tainted : ------------------------------------------------------ : migration/8/62 is trying to acquire lock: : (&port_lock_key){-.-.}, at: serial8250_console_write() : : but task is already holding lock: : (&rq->lock){-.-.}, at: sched_cpu_dying() : : which lock already depends on the new lock. : : : the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: : : -> #3 (&rq->lock){-.-.}: : __lock_acquire() : lock_acquire() : _raw_spin_lock() : task_fork_fair() : sched_fork() : copy_process.part.31() : _do_fork() : kernel_thread() : rest_init() : start_kernel() : x86_64_start_reservations() : x86_64_start_kernel() : verify_cpu() : : -> #2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}: : __lock_acquire() : lock_acquire() : _raw_spin_lock_irqsave() : try_to_wake_up() : default_wake_function() : woken_wake_function() : __wake_up_common() : __wake_up_common_lock() : __wake_up() : tty_wakeup() : tty_port_default_wakeup() : tty_port_tty_wakeup() : uart_write_wakeup() : serial8250_tx_chars() : serial8250_handle_irq.part.25() : serial8250_default_handle_irq() : serial8250_interrupt() : __handle_irq_event_percpu() : handle_irq_event_percpu() : handle_irq_event() : handle_level_irq() : handle_irq() : do_IRQ() : ret_from_intr() : native_safe_halt() : default_idle() : arch_cpu_idle() : default_idle_call() : do_idle() : cpu_startup_entry() : rest_init() : start_kernel() : x86_64_start_reservations() : x86_64_start_kernel() : verify_cpu() : : -> #1 (&tty->write_wait){-.-.}: : __lock_acquire() : lock_acquire() : _raw_spin_lock_irqsave() : __wake_up_common_lock() : __wake_up() : tty_wakeup() : tty_port_default_wakeup() : tty_port_tty_wakeup() : uart_write_wakeup() : serial8250_tx_chars() : serial8250_handle_irq.part.25() : serial8250_default_handle_irq() : serial8250_interrupt() : __handle_irq_event_percpu() : handle_irq_event_percpu() : handle_irq_event() : handle_level_irq() : handle_irq() : do_IRQ() : ret_from_intr() : native_safe_halt() : default_idle() : arch_cpu_idle() : default_idle_call() : do_idle() : cpu_startup_entry() : rest_init() : start_kernel() : x86_64_start_reservations() : x86_64_start_kernel() : verify_cpu() : : -> #0 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}: : check_prev_add() : __lock_acquire() : lock_acquire() : _raw_spin_lock_irqsave() : serial8250_console_write() : univ8250_console_write() : console_unlock() : vprintk_emit() : vprintk_default() : vprintk_func() : printk() : ___ratelimit() : __printk_ratelimit() : select_fallback_rq() : sched_cpu_dying() : cpuhp_invoke_callback() : take_cpu_down() : multi_cpu_stop() : cpu_stopper_thread() : smpboot_thread_fn() : kthread() : ret_from_fork() : : other info that might help us debug this: : : Chain exists of: : &port_lock_key --> &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock : : Possible unsafe locking scenario: : : CPU0 CPU1 : ---- ---- : lock(&rq->lock); : lock(&p->pi_lock); : lock(&rq->lock); : lock(&port_lock_key); : : *** DEADLOCK *** : : 4 locks held by migration/8/62: : #0: (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}, at: sched_cpu_dying() : #1: (&rq->lock){-.-.}, at: sched_cpu_dying() : #2: (printk_ratelimit_state.lock){....}, at: ___ratelimit() : #3: (console_lock){+.+.}, at: vprintk_emit() : : stack backtrace: : CPU: 8 PID: 62 Comm: migration/8 Not tainted 4.14.0-rc2-next-20170927+ #252 : Call Trace: : dump_stack() : print_circular_bug() : check_prev_add() : ? add_lock_to_list.isra.26() : ? check_usage() : ? kvm_clock_read() : ? kvm_sched_clock_read() : ? sched_clock() : ? check_preemption_disabled() : __lock_acquire() : ? __lock_acquire() : ? add_lock_to_list.isra.26() : ? debug_check_no_locks_freed() : ? memcpy() : lock_acquire() : ? serial8250_console_write() : _raw_spin_lock_irqsave() : ? serial8250_console_write() : serial8250_console_write() : ? serial8250_start_tx() : ? lock_acquire() : ? memcpy() : univ8250_console_write() : console_unlock() : ? __down_trylock_console_sem() : vprintk_emit() : vprintk_default() : vprintk_func() : printk() : ? show_regs_print_info() : ? lock_acquire() : ___ratelimit() : __printk_ratelimit() : select_fallback_rq() : sched_cpu_dying() : ? sched_cpu_starting() : ? rcutree_dying_cpu() : ? sched_cpu_starting() : cpuhp_invoke_callback() : ? cpu_disable_common() : take_cpu_down() : ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller() : ? cpuhp_invoke_callback() : multi_cpu_stop() : ? __this_cpu_preempt_check() : ? cpu_stop_queue_work() : cpu_stopper_thread() : ? cpu_stop_create() : smpboot_thread_fn() : ? sort_range() : ? schedule() : ? __kthread_parkme() : kthread() : ? sort_range() : ? kthread_create_on_node() : ret_from_fork() : process 9121 (trinity-c78) no longer affine to cpu8 : smpboot: CPU 8 is now offline Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 6b1d174 ("ratelimit: extend to print suppressed messages on release") Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]> Reported-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2017
commit 656d61c upstream. printk_ratelimit() invokes ___ratelimit() which may invoke a normal printk() (pr_warn() in this particular case) to warn about suppressed output. Given that printk_ratelimit() may be called from anywhere, that pr_warn() is dangerous - it may end up deadlocking the system. Fix ___ratelimit() by using deferred printk(). Sasha reported the following lockdep error: : Unregister pv shared memory for cpu 8 : select_fallback_rq: 3 callbacks suppressed : process 8583 (trinity-c78) no longer affine to cpu8 : : ====================================================== : WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected : 4.14.0-rc2-next-20170927+ #252 Not tainted : ------------------------------------------------------ : migration/8/62 is trying to acquire lock: : (&port_lock_key){-.-.}, at: serial8250_console_write() : : but task is already holding lock: : (&rq->lock){-.-.}, at: sched_cpu_dying() : : which lock already depends on the new lock. : : : the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: : : -> #3 (&rq->lock){-.-.}: : __lock_acquire() : lock_acquire() : _raw_spin_lock() : task_fork_fair() : sched_fork() : copy_process.part.31() : _do_fork() : kernel_thread() : rest_init() : start_kernel() : x86_64_start_reservations() : x86_64_start_kernel() : verify_cpu() : : -> #2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}: : __lock_acquire() : lock_acquire() : _raw_spin_lock_irqsave() : try_to_wake_up() : default_wake_function() : woken_wake_function() : __wake_up_common() : __wake_up_common_lock() : __wake_up() : tty_wakeup() : tty_port_default_wakeup() : tty_port_tty_wakeup() : uart_write_wakeup() : serial8250_tx_chars() : serial8250_handle_irq.part.25() : serial8250_default_handle_irq() : serial8250_interrupt() : __handle_irq_event_percpu() : handle_irq_event_percpu() : handle_irq_event() : handle_level_irq() : handle_irq() : do_IRQ() : ret_from_intr() : native_safe_halt() : default_idle() : arch_cpu_idle() : default_idle_call() : do_idle() : cpu_startup_entry() : rest_init() : start_kernel() : x86_64_start_reservations() : x86_64_start_kernel() : verify_cpu() : : -> #1 (&tty->write_wait){-.-.}: : __lock_acquire() : lock_acquire() : _raw_spin_lock_irqsave() : __wake_up_common_lock() : __wake_up() : tty_wakeup() : tty_port_default_wakeup() : tty_port_tty_wakeup() : uart_write_wakeup() : serial8250_tx_chars() : serial8250_handle_irq.part.25() : serial8250_default_handle_irq() : serial8250_interrupt() : __handle_irq_event_percpu() : handle_irq_event_percpu() : handle_irq_event() : handle_level_irq() : handle_irq() : do_IRQ() : ret_from_intr() : native_safe_halt() : default_idle() : arch_cpu_idle() : default_idle_call() : do_idle() : cpu_startup_entry() : rest_init() : start_kernel() : x86_64_start_reservations() : x86_64_start_kernel() : verify_cpu() : : -> #0 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}: : check_prev_add() : __lock_acquire() : lock_acquire() : _raw_spin_lock_irqsave() : serial8250_console_write() : univ8250_console_write() : console_unlock() : vprintk_emit() : vprintk_default() : vprintk_func() : printk() : ___ratelimit() : __printk_ratelimit() : select_fallback_rq() : sched_cpu_dying() : cpuhp_invoke_callback() : take_cpu_down() : multi_cpu_stop() : cpu_stopper_thread() : smpboot_thread_fn() : kthread() : ret_from_fork() : : other info that might help us debug this: : : Chain exists of: : &port_lock_key --> &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock : : Possible unsafe locking scenario: : : CPU0 CPU1 : ---- ---- : lock(&rq->lock); : lock(&p->pi_lock); : lock(&rq->lock); : lock(&port_lock_key); : : *** DEADLOCK *** : : 4 locks held by migration/8/62: : #0: (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}, at: sched_cpu_dying() : #1: (&rq->lock){-.-.}, at: sched_cpu_dying() : #2: (printk_ratelimit_state.lock){....}, at: ___ratelimit() : #3: (console_lock){+.+.}, at: vprintk_emit() : : stack backtrace: : CPU: 8 PID: 62 Comm: migration/8 Not tainted 4.14.0-rc2-next-20170927+ #252 : Call Trace: : dump_stack() : print_circular_bug() : check_prev_add() : ? add_lock_to_list.isra.26() : ? check_usage() : ? kvm_clock_read() : ? kvm_sched_clock_read() : ? sched_clock() : ? check_preemption_disabled() : __lock_acquire() : ? __lock_acquire() : ? add_lock_to_list.isra.26() : ? debug_check_no_locks_freed() : ? memcpy() : lock_acquire() : ? serial8250_console_write() : _raw_spin_lock_irqsave() : ? serial8250_console_write() : serial8250_console_write() : ? serial8250_start_tx() : ? lock_acquire() : ? memcpy() : univ8250_console_write() : console_unlock() : ? __down_trylock_console_sem() : vprintk_emit() : vprintk_default() : vprintk_func() : printk() : ? show_regs_print_info() : ? lock_acquire() : ___ratelimit() : __printk_ratelimit() : select_fallback_rq() : sched_cpu_dying() : ? sched_cpu_starting() : ? rcutree_dying_cpu() : ? sched_cpu_starting() : cpuhp_invoke_callback() : ? cpu_disable_common() : take_cpu_down() : ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller() : ? cpuhp_invoke_callback() : multi_cpu_stop() : ? __this_cpu_preempt_check() : ? cpu_stop_queue_work() : cpu_stopper_thread() : ? cpu_stop_create() : smpboot_thread_fn() : ? sort_range() : ? schedule() : ? __kthread_parkme() : kthread() : ? sort_range() : ? kthread_create_on_node() : ret_from_fork() : process 9121 (trinity-c78) no longer affine to cpu8 : smpboot: CPU 8 is now offline Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 6b1d174 ("ratelimit: extend to print suppressed messages on release") Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]> Reported-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
File "temp.py", line 9, in I'm getting this error in my file . I'm using DS18B20 with raspberry zero w. These are the files it showing sudo modprobe w1-gpio and when is use it gives me this error...!!! Thanks in advance ....!!!! |
I am experiencing the same... |
|
Raspberry Pis have no 1wire hardware - the interface is bit-bashed in software using GPIOs. For small numbers of devices where the system is lightly loaded this can work fine, but if you start doing exotic things like parasitic powering with more than one device then you are unlikely to succeed. If you want more support you'll have to write more than a me-too, but essentially there isn't much we can do. |
margro
pushed a commit
to margro/linux
that referenced
this issue
May 28, 2023
[ Upstream commit 6bf9e4b ] [BUG] When accessing a file on a crafted image, btrfs can crash in block layer: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 PGD 136501067 P4D 136501067 PUD 124519067 PMD 0 CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8-default raspberrypi#252 RIP: 0010:end_bio_extent_readpage+0x144/0x700 Call Trace: <IRQ> blk_update_request+0x8f/0x350 blk_mq_end_request+0x1a/0x120 blk_done_softirq+0x99/0xc0 __do_softirq+0xc7/0x467 irq_exit+0xd1/0xe0 call_function_single_interrupt+0xf/0x20 </IRQ> RIP: 0010:default_idle+0x1e/0x170 [CAUSE] The crafted image has a tricky corruption, the INODE_ITEM has a different type against its parent dir: item 20 key (268 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 2808 itemsize 160 generation 13 transid 13 size 1048576 nbytes 1048576 block group 0 mode 121644 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 9 flags 0x0(none) This mode number 0120000 means it's a symlink. But the dir item think it's still a regular file: item 8 key (264 DIR_INDEX 5) itemoff 3707 itemsize 32 location key (268 INODE_ITEM 0) type FILE transid 13 data_len 0 name_len 2 name: f4 item 40 key (264 DIR_ITEM 51821248) itemoff 1573 itemsize 32 location key (268 INODE_ITEM 0) type FILE transid 13 data_len 0 name_len 2 name: f4 For symlink, we don't set BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree.ops and leave it empty, as symlink is only designed to have inlined extent, all handled by tree block read. Thus no need to trigger btrfs_submit_bio_hook() for inline file extent. However end_bio_extent_readpage() expects tree->ops populated, as it's reading regular data extent. This causes NULL pointer dereference. [FIX] This patch fixes the problem in two ways: - Verify inode mode against its dir item when looking up inode So in btrfs_lookup_dentry() if we find inode mode mismatch with dir item, we error out so that corrupted inode will not be accessed. - Verify inode mode when getting extent mapping Only regular file should have regular or preallocated extent. If we found regular/preallocated file extent for symlink or the rest, we error out before submitting the read bio. With this fix that crafted image can be rejected gracefully: BTRFS critical (device loop0): inode mode mismatch with dir: inode mode=0121644 btrfs type=7 dir type=1 Reported-by: Yoon Jungyeon <[email protected]> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202763 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 9, 2023
Add various tests to check maximum number of supported programs being attached: # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts [...] ./test_progs -t tc_opts [ 1.185325] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.186826] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel [ 1.270123] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.988 MHz [ 1.272428] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fc932722, max_idle_ns: 440795381586 ns [ 1.276408] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc #252 tc_opts_after:OK #253 tc_opts_append:OK #254 tc_opts_basic:OK #255 tc_opts_before:OK #256 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #257 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK #258 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #259 tc_opts_demixed:OK #260 tc_opts_detach:OK #261 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #262 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #263 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #264 tc_opts_invalid:OK #265 tc_opts_max:OK <--- (new test) #266 tc_opts_mixed:OK #267 tc_opts_prepend:OK #268 tc_opts_replace:OK #269 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 18/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 16, 2023
Add a new test case which performs double query of the bpf_mprog through libbpf API, but also via raw bpf(2) syscall. This is testing to gather first the count and then in a subsequent probe the full information with the program array without clearing passed structs in between. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts [...] ./test_progs -t tc_opts [ 1.398818] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.999 MHz [ 1.400263] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fd336761, max_idle_ns: 440795243819 ns [ 1.402734] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc [ 1.426639] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.428112] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel #252 tc_opts_after:OK #253 tc_opts_append:OK #254 tc_opts_basic:OK #255 tc_opts_before:OK #256 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #257 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK #258 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #259 tc_opts_demixed:OK #260 tc_opts_detach:OK #261 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #262 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #263 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #264 tc_opts_invalid:OK #265 tc_opts_max:OK #266 tc_opts_mixed:OK #267 tc_opts_prepend:OK #268 tc_opts_query:OK <--- (new test) #269 tc_opts_replace:OK #270 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 19/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 16, 2023
Add a new test case to query on an empty bpf_mprog and pass the revision directly into expected_revision for attachment to assert that this does succeed. ./test_progs -t tc_opts [ 1.406778] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.990 MHz [ 1.408863] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fcaf6eb0, max_idle_ns: 440795321766 ns [ 1.412419] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc [ 1.428671] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.430260] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel #252 tc_opts_after:OK #253 tc_opts_append:OK #254 tc_opts_basic:OK #255 tc_opts_before:OK #256 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK #257 tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK #258 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK #259 tc_opts_demixed:OK #260 tc_opts_detach:OK #261 tc_opts_detach_after:OK #262 tc_opts_detach_before:OK #263 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK #264 tc_opts_invalid:OK #265 tc_opts_max:OK #266 tc_opts_mixed:OK #267 tc_opts_prepend:OK #268 tc_opts_query:OK #269 tc_opts_query_attach:OK <--- (new test) #270 tc_opts_replace:OK #271 tc_opts_revision:OK Summary: 20/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 28, 2025
There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation to hang forever, blocking the write path. Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.14.0-rc1 #252 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 but task is already holding lock: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}: blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500 blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0 scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80 sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470 sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60 blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0 btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs] btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs] btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs] btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs] start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs] btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs] kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}: down_read+0x9b/0x470 btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs] btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs] btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs] btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0 __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00 writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00 wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800 wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0 process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460 worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0 kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360 btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0 __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00 writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00 wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800 wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0 process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460 worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0 kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540 __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60 wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0 bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0 del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20 sd_remove+0x85/0x130 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340 scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170 scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0 sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug] device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 device_unregister+0x13/0xa0 sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug] scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16); lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem); lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16); lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by modprobe/1110: #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520 #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0 #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520 #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130 #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 #252 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90 print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274 check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0 ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650 ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10 ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0 ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0 ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0 wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0 bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0 ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10 ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510 del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20 ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60 ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110 sd_remove+0x85/0x130 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10 __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340 scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170 scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0 sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10 device_unregister+0x13/0xa0 sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug] scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520 ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10 ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50 ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0 ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590 ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0 ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]> CC: <[email protected]> # 6.13+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
popcornmix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 14, 2025
[ Upstream commit 866bafa ] There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation to hang forever, blocking the write path. Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.14.0-rc1 #252 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 but task is already holding lock: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}: blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500 blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0 scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80 sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470 sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60 blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0 btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs] btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs] btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs] btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs] start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs] btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs] kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}: down_read+0x9b/0x470 btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs] btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs] btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs] btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0 __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00 writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00 wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800 wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0 process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460 worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0 kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360 btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0 __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00 writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00 wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800 wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0 process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460 worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0 kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540 __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60 wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0 bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0 del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20 sd_remove+0x85/0x130 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340 scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170 scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0 sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug] device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 device_unregister+0x13/0xa0 sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug] scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16); lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem); lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16); lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by modprobe/1110: #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520 #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0 #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520 #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130 #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 #252 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90 print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274 check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0 ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650 ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10 ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0 ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0 ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0 wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0 bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0 ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10 ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510 del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20 ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60 ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110 sd_remove+0x85/0x130 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10 __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340 scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170 scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0 sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10 device_unregister+0x13/0xa0 sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug] scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520 ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10 ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50 ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0 ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590 ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0 ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]> CC: <[email protected]> # 6.13+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi.
I'm using three 1-Wire temperature sensor in the same time on the Raspberry Pi, all works OK also in Parasite power (w1-gpio pullup=1 into the file /etc/modules).
There is only a problem during a considerable ethernet throughput.
I try to explane it better, follow this example:
I'm downloading three files in the same time, the total network download speed is 1.8 MB/sec, if I interrogate one or more sensor I beginning to get crc=NO, and later, after more crc=NO, I get: No such file or directory (es: cat /sys/devices/w1_bus_master1/3b-00000014fe14/w1_slave: No such file or directory). After same minutes the sensor come up again and the file w1_slave is again there. Leter the problem happens again untill the ethernet traffic will finish. This problem occurred even before the pullups option for w1 interface.
The /var/log/messages says:
Mar 19 11:23:13 raspberrypi kernel: [ 2694.207597] w1_slave_driver 3b-00000014fe14: 18S20 doesn't respond to CONVERT_TEMP.
but only during crc=NO, no infos during w1_slave: No such file or directory.
If you need more info, let me know.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: