bcm2710-rpi-zero-2-w.dts defines "TXD0" and "RXD0" twice #5058

mattjlewis · 2022-06-07T08:37:02Z

Describe the bug

File bcm2710-rpi-zero-2-w.dts has "TXD0" and "RXD0" defined twice. I believe the first definitions should be TXD1 and RXD1 in line with other boards.

Steps to reproduce the behaviour

The gpioinfo command lists TXD0 and RXD0 twice.

Device (s)

Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W

System

$ cat /etc/rpi-issue
Raspberry Pi reference 2022-04-04
Generated using pi-gen, https://github.com/RPi-Distro/pi-gen, 27a8050c3c06e567c794620394a8c2d74262a516, stage2

$ vcgencmd version
Mar 24 2022 13:20:54
Copyright (c) 2012 Broadcom
version e5a963efa66a1974127860b42e913d2374139ff5 (clean) (release) (start)

$ uname -a
Linux zero2-1 5.15.32-v8+ #1538 SMP PREEMPT Thu Mar 31 19:40:39 BST 2022 aarch64 GNU/Linux

Logs

No response

Additional context

I appreciate this is a minor issue, however, confuses GPIO auto discovery.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: #5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]>

pelwell · 2022-06-07T12:48:30Z

This duplication comes as a result of the mixed heritage of the Zero 2 W - half Zero and half 3B. The Zero 2W schematic calls the first two of these GPIO14 and GPIO15, and in a way that's the most accurate, but they are also commented as (TXD0) and (RXD0). Meanwhile GPIOs 30-33 are actually labelled BT_CTS, BT_RTS, BT_TXD and BT_RXD respectively. Note that these are the same labels and comments as appear on the 3B schematic (and probably others as well), so one could argue that both/all are wrong, but I agree that for consistency these would be better as TXD1 and RXD1.

Thanks for reporting this - see 83bb376 for the fix.

mattjlewis · 2022-06-07T12:55:35Z

Thank you for the swift response. Apologies, I should have also checked other Zero variants - I notice that the Zero W dts also has this oddity.

GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: #5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]>

pelwell · 2022-06-07T13:22:53Z

Also fixed now.

GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: #5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]>

GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: raspberrypi#5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]>

GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: #5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]>

GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: raspberrypi#5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]>

GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: #5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]>

pelwell · 2022-07-20T12:53:57Z

Closing as the reported fault has been fixed.

GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: #5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]>

GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: raspberrypi#5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]>

GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: #5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]>

commit 83bb3768c8823ec294e4a7f30d1c9e1b308b7e96 from https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git rpi-5.15.y GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: raspberrypi/linux#5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Meng Li <[email protected]>

commit e4adbab1f577d9a88b5056c5dad41ae7ee79f977 from https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git rpi-5.15.y GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: raspberrypi/linux#5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Meng Li <[email protected]>

commit 83bb3768c8823ec294e4a7f30d1c9e1b308b7e96 from https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git rpi-5.15.y GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: raspberrypi/linux#5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Meng Li <[email protected]>

commit e4adbab1f577d9a88b5056c5dad41ae7ee79f977 from https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git rpi-5.15.y GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: raspberrypi/linux#5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Meng Li <[email protected]>

commit 83bb3768c8823ec294e4a7f30d1c9e1b308b7e96 from https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git rpi-5.15.y GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: raspberrypi/linux#5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Meng Li <[email protected]>

commit e4adbab1f577d9a88b5056c5dad41ae7ee79f977 from https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux.git rpi-5.15.y GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: raspberrypi/linux#5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Meng Li <[email protected]>

GPIOs 14 and 15 are currently labelled TXD0 and RXD0, which matches comments on the schematic but 1) doesn't reflect their likely usage (i.e. UART1) and 2) clashes with GPIOs 32 and 33. Adopt the common naming for those two pins on BT-equipped Pis - TXD1 and RXD1. See: raspberrypi/linux#5058 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]>

pelwell closed this as completed Jul 20, 2022

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

bcm2710-rpi-zero-2-w.dts defines "TXD0" and "RXD0" twice #5058

bcm2710-rpi-zero-2-w.dts defines "TXD0" and "RXD0" twice #5058

mattjlewis commented Jun 7, 2022

pelwell commented Jun 7, 2022

mattjlewis commented Jun 7, 2022

pelwell commented Jun 7, 2022

pelwell commented Jul 20, 2022

bcm2710-rpi-zero-2-w.dts defines "TXD0" and "RXD0" twice #5058

bcm2710-rpi-zero-2-w.dts defines "TXD0" and "RXD0" twice #5058

Comments

mattjlewis commented Jun 7, 2022

Describe the bug

Steps to reproduce the behaviour

Device (s)

System

Logs

Additional context

pelwell commented Jun 7, 2022

mattjlewis commented Jun 7, 2022

pelwell commented Jun 7, 2022

pelwell commented Jul 20, 2022