Skip to content

Fix for PCM register ranges in device trees #1073

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

rtiemann
Copy link

There are two minor issues with the current device trees:

  1. the PCM_GRAY register is not included in the 0x7e203000 range; and
  2. the range starting at 0x7e101098 should probably be 8 bytes long, not 2 bytes (I couldn't find any documentation for this memory area, but the code suggests so).

Excerpt of /proc/iomem in current version (tested with bcm2708.dtsi):

20101098-20101099 : /soc/i2s@7e203000
20203000-2020301f : /soc/i2s@7e203000

Excerpt of /proc/iomem with this change applied:

20101098-2010109f : /soc/i2s@7e203000
20203000-20203023 : /soc/i2s@7e203000

This is probably not causing any problems at all, but I just noticed it while reading the RPi I2S driver.

Please let me know if I should submit these patches on some other branch.

@popcornmix
Copy link
Collaborator

ping @pelwell

@pelwell
Copy link
Contributor

pelwell commented Jul 18, 2015

This is 3.18, which we aren't maintaining.

@pelwell
Copy link
Contributor

pelwell commented Jul 18, 2015

But apart from that it looks correct.

@rtiemann
Copy link
Author

Do you want me to submit these patches on rpi-4.0.y and rpi-4.1.y?

@pelwell
Copy link
Contributor

pelwell commented Jul 20, 2015

Yes, if you'd like your name on the commit, otherwise I will do it - it's up to you. There's less to do on 4.0+ because the i2s node has been moved into bcm2708_common.dtsi, which is shared between 2708 and 2709 builds.

@rtiemann
Copy link
Author

I'll do it then.

@pelwell
Copy link
Contributor

pelwell commented Jul 20, 2015

#1079 and #1080 merged - thanks.

@pelwell pelwell closed this Jul 20, 2015
@rtiemann rtiemann deleted the rpi-3.18.y-i2s-iomem branch July 20, 2015 09:43
anholt pushed a commit to anholt/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2015
…ints

In (23a4e40 arm: kgdb: Handle read-only text / modules) we moved to
using patch_text() to set breakpoints so that we could handle the case
when we had CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA.  That patch used patch_text().
Unfortunately, patch_text() assumes that we're not in atomic context
when it runs since it needs to grab a mutex and also wait for other
CPUs to stop (which it does with a completion).

This would result in a stack crawl if you had
CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP and tried to set a breakpoint in kgdb.  The
crawl looked something like:

 BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x00010007
 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.2.0-rc7-00133-geb63b34 raspberrypi#1073
 Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree)
  (unwind_backtrace) from [<c00133d4>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
  (show_stack) from [<c05400e8>] (dump_stack+0x84/0xb8)
  (dump_stack) from [<c004913c>] (__schedule_bug+0x54/0x6c)
  (__schedule_bug) from [<c054065c>] (__schedule+0x80/0x668)
  (__schedule) from [<c0540cfc>] (schedule+0xb8/0xd4)
  (schedule) from [<c0543a3c>] (schedule_timeout+0x2c/0x234)
  (schedule_timeout) from [<c05417c0>] (wait_for_common+0xf4/0x188)
  (wait_for_common) from [<c0541874>] (wait_for_completion+0x20/0x24)
  (wait_for_completion) from [<c00a0104>] (__stop_cpus+0x58/0x70)
  (__stop_cpus) from [<c00a0580>] (stop_cpus+0x3c/0x54)
  (stop_cpus) from [<c00a06c4>] (__stop_machine+0xcc/0xe8)
  (__stop_machine) from [<c00a0714>] (stop_machine+0x34/0x44)
  (stop_machine) from [<c00173e8>] (patch_text+0x28/0x34)
  (patch_text) from [<c001733c>] (kgdb_arch_set_breakpoint+0x40/0x4c)
  (kgdb_arch_set_breakpoint) from [<c00a0d68>] (kgdb_validate_break_address+0x2c/0x60)
  (kgdb_validate_break_address) from [<c00a0e90>] (dbg_set_sw_break+0x1c/0xdc)
  (dbg_set_sw_break) from [<c00a2e88>] (gdb_serial_stub+0x9c4/0xba4)
  (gdb_serial_stub) from [<c00a11cc>] (kgdb_cpu_enter+0x1f8/0x60c)
  (kgdb_cpu_enter) from [<c00a18cc>] (kgdb_handle_exception+0x19c/0x1d0)
  (kgdb_handle_exception) from [<c0016f7c>] (kgdb_compiled_brk_fn+0x30/0x3c)
  (kgdb_compiled_brk_fn) from [<c00091a4>] (do_undefinstr+0x1a4/0x20c)
  (do_undefinstr) from [<c001400c>] (__und_svc_finish+0x0/0x34)

It turns out that when we're in kgdb all the CPUs are stopped anyway
so there's no reason we should be calling patch_text().  We can
instead directly call __patch_text() which assumes that CPUs have
already been stopped.

Fixes: 23a4e40 ("arm: kgdb: Handle read-only text / modules")
Reported-by: Aapo Vienamo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2015
…ints

commit 7ae85dc upstream.

In (23a4e40 arm: kgdb: Handle read-only text / modules) we moved to
using patch_text() to set breakpoints so that we could handle the case
when we had CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA.  That patch used patch_text().
Unfortunately, patch_text() assumes that we're not in atomic context
when it runs since it needs to grab a mutex and also wait for other
CPUs to stop (which it does with a completion).

This would result in a stack crawl if you had
CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP and tried to set a breakpoint in kgdb.  The
crawl looked something like:

 BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x00010007
 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.2.0-rc7-00133-geb63b34 #1073
 Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree)
  (unwind_backtrace) from [<c00133d4>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
  (show_stack) from [<c05400e8>] (dump_stack+0x84/0xb8)
  (dump_stack) from [<c004913c>] (__schedule_bug+0x54/0x6c)
  (__schedule_bug) from [<c054065c>] (__schedule+0x80/0x668)
  (__schedule) from [<c0540cfc>] (schedule+0xb8/0xd4)
  (schedule) from [<c0543a3c>] (schedule_timeout+0x2c/0x234)
  (schedule_timeout) from [<c05417c0>] (wait_for_common+0xf4/0x188)
  (wait_for_common) from [<c0541874>] (wait_for_completion+0x20/0x24)
  (wait_for_completion) from [<c00a0104>] (__stop_cpus+0x58/0x70)
  (__stop_cpus) from [<c00a0580>] (stop_cpus+0x3c/0x54)
  (stop_cpus) from [<c00a06c4>] (__stop_machine+0xcc/0xe8)
  (__stop_machine) from [<c00a0714>] (stop_machine+0x34/0x44)
  (stop_machine) from [<c00173e8>] (patch_text+0x28/0x34)
  (patch_text) from [<c001733c>] (kgdb_arch_set_breakpoint+0x40/0x4c)
  (kgdb_arch_set_breakpoint) from [<c00a0d68>] (kgdb_validate_break_address+0x2c/0x60)
  (kgdb_validate_break_address) from [<c00a0e90>] (dbg_set_sw_break+0x1c/0xdc)
  (dbg_set_sw_break) from [<c00a2e88>] (gdb_serial_stub+0x9c4/0xba4)
  (gdb_serial_stub) from [<c00a11cc>] (kgdb_cpu_enter+0x1f8/0x60c)
  (kgdb_cpu_enter) from [<c00a18cc>] (kgdb_handle_exception+0x19c/0x1d0)
  (kgdb_handle_exception) from [<c0016f7c>] (kgdb_compiled_brk_fn+0x30/0x3c)
  (kgdb_compiled_brk_fn) from [<c00091a4>] (do_undefinstr+0x1a4/0x20c)
  (do_undefinstr) from [<c001400c>] (__und_svc_finish+0x0/0x34)

It turns out that when we're in kgdb all the CPUs are stopped anyway
so there's no reason we should be calling patch_text().  We can
instead directly call __patch_text() which assumes that CPUs have
already been stopped.

Fixes: 23a4e40 ("arm: kgdb: Handle read-only text / modules")
Reported-by: Aapo Vienamo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2015
…ints

commit 7ae85dc upstream.

In (23a4e40 arm: kgdb: Handle read-only text / modules) we moved to
using patch_text() to set breakpoints so that we could handle the case
when we had CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA.  That patch used patch_text().
Unfortunately, patch_text() assumes that we're not in atomic context
when it runs since it needs to grab a mutex and also wait for other
CPUs to stop (which it does with a completion).

This would result in a stack crawl if you had
CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP and tried to set a breakpoint in kgdb.  The
crawl looked something like:

 BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x00010007
 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.2.0-rc7-00133-geb63b34 #1073
 Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree)
  (unwind_backtrace) from [<c00133d4>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
  (show_stack) from [<c05400e8>] (dump_stack+0x84/0xb8)
  (dump_stack) from [<c004913c>] (__schedule_bug+0x54/0x6c)
  (__schedule_bug) from [<c054065c>] (__schedule+0x80/0x668)
  (__schedule) from [<c0540cfc>] (schedule+0xb8/0xd4)
  (schedule) from [<c0543a3c>] (schedule_timeout+0x2c/0x234)
  (schedule_timeout) from [<c05417c0>] (wait_for_common+0xf4/0x188)
  (wait_for_common) from [<c0541874>] (wait_for_completion+0x20/0x24)
  (wait_for_completion) from [<c00a0104>] (__stop_cpus+0x58/0x70)
  (__stop_cpus) from [<c00a0580>] (stop_cpus+0x3c/0x54)
  (stop_cpus) from [<c00a06c4>] (__stop_machine+0xcc/0xe8)
  (__stop_machine) from [<c00a0714>] (stop_machine+0x34/0x44)
  (stop_machine) from [<c00173e8>] (patch_text+0x28/0x34)
  (patch_text) from [<c001733c>] (kgdb_arch_set_breakpoint+0x40/0x4c)
  (kgdb_arch_set_breakpoint) from [<c00a0d68>] (kgdb_validate_break_address+0x2c/0x60)
  (kgdb_validate_break_address) from [<c00a0e90>] (dbg_set_sw_break+0x1c/0xdc)
  (dbg_set_sw_break) from [<c00a2e88>] (gdb_serial_stub+0x9c4/0xba4)
  (gdb_serial_stub) from [<c00a11cc>] (kgdb_cpu_enter+0x1f8/0x60c)
  (kgdb_cpu_enter) from [<c00a18cc>] (kgdb_handle_exception+0x19c/0x1d0)
  (kgdb_handle_exception) from [<c0016f7c>] (kgdb_compiled_brk_fn+0x30/0x3c)
  (kgdb_compiled_brk_fn) from [<c00091a4>] (do_undefinstr+0x1a4/0x20c)
  (do_undefinstr) from [<c001400c>] (__und_svc_finish+0x0/0x34)

It turns out that when we're in kgdb all the CPUs are stopped anyway
so there's no reason we should be calling patch_text().  We can
instead directly call __patch_text() which assumes that CPUs have
already been stopped.

Fixes: 23a4e40 ("arm: kgdb: Handle read-only text / modules")
Reported-by: Aapo Vienamo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants