Skip to content

dwc_otg: Don't issue traffic to LS devices in FS mode #390

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2013
Merged

dwc_otg: Don't issue traffic to LS devices in FS mode #390

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2013

Conversation

P33M
Copy link
Contributor

@P33M P33M commented Oct 1, 2013

Issuing low-speed packets when the root port is in full-speed mode
causes the root port to stop responding. Explicitly fail when
enqueuing URBs to a LS endpoint on a FS bus.

This is most often seen when running with dwc_otg.speed=1.

dwc_otg: Don't issue traffic to LS devices in FS mode
2a8d45e 
Issuing low-speed packets when the root port is in full-speed mode
causes the root port to stop responding. Explicitly fail when
enqueuing URBs to a LS endpoint on a FS bus.
popcornmix added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2013
@popcornmix
Merge pull request #390 from P33M/rpi-3.6.y
10bc582 
dwc_otg: Don't issue traffic to LS devices in FS mode
@popcornmix popcornmix merged commit 10bc582 into raspberrypi:rpi-3.6.y Oct 2, 2013
asb pushed a commit to asb/firmware that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2013
firmware: usb: add usb_mdio config option and set the default to 0x5000
e6b21d6 
Use: usb_mdio=0x7000 to revert the behaviour

kernel: dwc_otg: Don't issue traffic to LS devices in FS mode
See: raspberrypi/linux#390

kernel: Add AppleTalk module
See: raspberrypi/linux#386
swarren pushed a commit to swarren/linux-tegra that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2013
@skrll @gregkh
staging: dwc2: don't issue traffic to LS devices in FS mode
9f8144c 
I fell over the problem reported in
raspberrypi/linux#390:

"Issuing low-speed packets when the root port is in full-speed mode
 causes the root port to stop responding. Explicitly fail when
 enqueuing URBs to a LS endpoint on a FS bus."

with my dwc2 testing in NetBSD, so I adapted the change to dwc2.

Signed-off-by: Nick Hudson <[email protected]>
[paulz: fixed up the patch to compile under Linux, and tested it]
Signed-off-by: Paul Zimmerman <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
neuschaefer pushed a commit to neuschaefer/raspi-binary-firmware that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2017
firmware: usb: add usb_mdio config option and set the default to 0x5000
b4d6e03 
Use: usb_mdio=0x7000 to revert the behaviour

kernel: dwc_otg: Don't issue traffic to LS devices in FS mode
See: raspberrypi/linux#390

kernel: Add AppleTalk module
See: raspberrypi/linux#386
ED6E0F17 pushed a commit to ED6E0F17/linux that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2019
@minchank
UPSTREAM: zram: fix lockdep warning of free block handling
0c3de48 
Patch series "zram idle page writeback", v3.

Inherently, swap device has many idle pages which are rare touched since
it was allocated.  It is never problem if we use storage device as swap.
However, it's just waste for zram-swap.

This patchset supports zram idle page writeback feature.

* Admin can define what is idle page "no access since X time ago"
* Admin can define when zram should writeback them
* Admin can define when zram should stop writeback to prevent wearout

Details are in each patch's description.

This patch (of 7):

  ================================
  WARNING: inconsistent lock state
  4.19.0+ raspberrypi#390 Not tainted
  --------------------------------
  inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
  zram_verify/2095 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
  00000000b1828693 (&(&zram->bitmap_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: put_entry_bdev+0x1e/0x50
  {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
    _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
    zram_make_request+0x755/0xdc9
    generic_make_request+0x373/0x6a0
    submit_bio+0x6c/0x140
    __swap_writepage+0x3a8/0x480
    shrink_page_list+0x1102/0x1a60
    shrink_inactive_list+0x21b/0x3f0
    shrink_node_memcg.constprop.99+0x4f8/0x7e0
    shrink_node+0x7d/0x2f0
    do_try_to_free_pages+0xe0/0x300
    try_to_free_pages+0x116/0x2b0
    __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x3f4/0xf80
    __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2a2/0x2f0
    __handle_mm_fault+0x42e/0xb50
    handle_mm_fault+0x55/0xb0
    __do_page_fault+0x235/0x4b0
    page_fault+0x1e/0x30
  irq event stamp: 228412
  hardirqs last  enabled at (228412): [<ffffffff98245846>] __slab_free+0x3e6/0x600
  hardirqs last disabled at (228411): [<ffffffff98245625>] __slab_free+0x1c5/0x600
  softirqs last  enabled at (228396): [<ffffffff98e0031e>] __do_softirq+0x31e/0x427
  softirqs last disabled at (228403): [<ffffffff98072051>] irq_exit+0xd1/0xe0

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(&(&zram->bitmap_lock)->rlock);
    <Interrupt>
      lock(&(&zram->bitmap_lock)->rlock);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  no locks held by zram_verify/2095.

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 5 PID: 2095 Comm: zram_verify Not tainted 4.19.0+ raspberrypi#390
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <IRQ>
   dump_stack+0x67/0x9b
   print_usage_bug+0x1bd/0x1d3
   mark_lock+0x4aa/0x540
   __lock_acquire+0x51d/0x1300
   lock_acquire+0x90/0x180
   _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
   put_entry_bdev+0x1e/0x50
   zram_free_page+0xf6/0x110
   zram_slot_free_notify+0x42/0xa0
   end_swap_bio_read+0x5b/0x170
   blk_update_request+0x8f/0x340
   scsi_end_request+0x2c/0x1e0
   scsi_io_completion+0x98/0x650
   blk_done_softirq+0x9e/0xd0
   __do_softirq+0xcc/0x427
   irq_exit+0xd1/0xe0
   do_IRQ+0x93/0x120
   common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
   </IRQ>

With writeback feature, zram_slot_free_notify could be called in softirq
context by end_swap_bio_read.  However, bitmap_lock is not aware of that
so lockdep yell out:

  get_entry_bdev
  spin_lock(bitmap->lock);
  irq
  softirq
  end_swap_bio_read
  zram_slot_free_notify
  zram_slot_lock <-- deadlock prone
  zram_free_page
  put_entry_bdev
  spin_lock(bitmap->lock); <-- deadlock prone

With akpm's suggestion (i.e.  bitmap operation is already atomic), we
could remove bitmap lock.  It might fail to find a empty slot if serious
contention happens.  However, it's not severe problem because huge page
writeback has already possiblity to fail if there is severe memory
pressure.  Worst case is just keeping the incompressible in memory, not
storage.

The other problem is zram_slot_lock in zram_slot_slot_free_notify.  To
make it safe is this patch introduces zram_slot_trylock where
zram_slot_free_notify uses it.  Although it's rare to be contented, this
patch adds new debug stat "miss_free" to keep monitoring how often it
happens.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Joey Pabalinas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 3c9959e)

Bug: 117683045
Change-Id: I4bd620b1ab41de7e0e7fd5f38804f1c22481f652
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Paladugu <[email protected]>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2019
@minchank @gregkh
zram: fix lockdep warning of free block handling
6ffef4c 
[ Upstream commit 3c9959e ]

Patch series "zram idle page writeback", v3.

Inherently, swap device has many idle pages which are rare touched since
it was allocated.  It is never problem if we use storage device as swap.
However, it's just waste for zram-swap.

This patchset supports zram idle page writeback feature.

* Admin can define what is idle page "no access since X time ago"
* Admin can define when zram should writeback them
* Admin can define when zram should stop writeback to prevent wearout

Details are in each patch's description.

This patch (of 7):

  ================================
  WARNING: inconsistent lock state
  4.19.0+ #390 Not tainted
  --------------------------------
  inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
  zram_verify/2095 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
  00000000b1828693 (&(&zram->bitmap_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: put_entry_bdev+0x1e/0x50
  {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
    _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
    zram_make_request+0x755/0xdc9
    generic_make_request+0x373/0x6a0
    submit_bio+0x6c/0x140
    __swap_writepage+0x3a8/0x480
    shrink_page_list+0x1102/0x1a60
    shrink_inactive_list+0x21b/0x3f0
    shrink_node_memcg.constprop.99+0x4f8/0x7e0
    shrink_node+0x7d/0x2f0
    do_try_to_free_pages+0xe0/0x300
    try_to_free_pages+0x116/0x2b0
    __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x3f4/0xf80
    __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2a2/0x2f0
    __handle_mm_fault+0x42e/0xb50
    handle_mm_fault+0x55/0xb0
    __do_page_fault+0x235/0x4b0
    page_fault+0x1e/0x30
  irq event stamp: 228412
  hardirqs last  enabled at (228412): [<ffffffff98245846>] __slab_free+0x3e6/0x600
  hardirqs last disabled at (228411): [<ffffffff98245625>] __slab_free+0x1c5/0x600
  softirqs last  enabled at (228396): [<ffffffff98e0031e>] __do_softirq+0x31e/0x427
  softirqs last disabled at (228403): [<ffffffff98072051>] irq_exit+0xd1/0xe0

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(&(&zram->bitmap_lock)->rlock);
    <Interrupt>
      lock(&(&zram->bitmap_lock)->rlock);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  no locks held by zram_verify/2095.

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 5 PID: 2095 Comm: zram_verify Not tainted 4.19.0+ #390
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <IRQ>
   dump_stack+0x67/0x9b
   print_usage_bug+0x1bd/0x1d3
   mark_lock+0x4aa/0x540
   __lock_acquire+0x51d/0x1300
   lock_acquire+0x90/0x180
   _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
   put_entry_bdev+0x1e/0x50
   zram_free_page+0xf6/0x110
   zram_slot_free_notify+0x42/0xa0
   end_swap_bio_read+0x5b/0x170
   blk_update_request+0x8f/0x340
   scsi_end_request+0x2c/0x1e0
   scsi_io_completion+0x98/0x650
   blk_done_softirq+0x9e/0xd0
   __do_softirq+0xcc/0x427
   irq_exit+0xd1/0xe0
   do_IRQ+0x93/0x120
   common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
   </IRQ>

With writeback feature, zram_slot_free_notify could be called in softirq
context by end_swap_bio_read.  However, bitmap_lock is not aware of that
so lockdep yell out:

  get_entry_bdev
  spin_lock(bitmap->lock);
  irq
  softirq
  end_swap_bio_read
  zram_slot_free_notify
  zram_slot_lock <-- deadlock prone
  zram_free_page
  put_entry_bdev
  spin_lock(bitmap->lock); <-- deadlock prone

With akpm's suggestion (i.e.  bitmap operation is already atomic), we
could remove bitmap lock.  It might fail to find a empty slot if serious
contention happens.  However, it's not severe problem because huge page
writeback has already possiblity to fail if there is severe memory
pressure.  Worst case is just keeping the incompressible in memory, not
storage.

The other problem is zram_slot_lock in zram_slot_slot_free_notify.  To
make it safe is this patch introduces zram_slot_trylock where
zram_slot_free_notify uses it.  Although it's rare to be contented, this
patch adds new debug stat "miss_free" to keep monitoring how often it
happens.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Joey Pabalinas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2019
@minchank @gregkh
zram: fix lockdep warning of free block handling
3b3ee49 
[ Upstream commit 3c9959e ]

Patch series "zram idle page writeback", v3.

Inherently, swap device has many idle pages which are rare touched since
it was allocated.  It is never problem if we use storage device as swap.
However, it's just waste for zram-swap.

This patchset supports zram idle page writeback feature.

* Admin can define what is idle page "no access since X time ago"
* Admin can define when zram should writeback them
* Admin can define when zram should stop writeback to prevent wearout

Details are in each patch's description.

This patch (of 7):

  ================================
  WARNING: inconsistent lock state
  4.19.0+ #390 Not tainted
  --------------------------------
  inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
  zram_verify/2095 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
  00000000b1828693 (&(&zram->bitmap_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: put_entry_bdev+0x1e/0x50
  {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
    _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
    zram_make_request+0x755/0xdc9
    generic_make_request+0x373/0x6a0
    submit_bio+0x6c/0x140
    __swap_writepage+0x3a8/0x480
    shrink_page_list+0x1102/0x1a60
    shrink_inactive_list+0x21b/0x3f0
    shrink_node_memcg.constprop.99+0x4f8/0x7e0
    shrink_node+0x7d/0x2f0
    do_try_to_free_pages+0xe0/0x300
    try_to_free_pages+0x116/0x2b0
    __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x3f4/0xf80
    __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2a2/0x2f0
    __handle_mm_fault+0x42e/0xb50
    handle_mm_fault+0x55/0xb0
    __do_page_fault+0x235/0x4b0
    page_fault+0x1e/0x30
  irq event stamp: 228412
  hardirqs last  enabled at (228412): [<ffffffff98245846>] __slab_free+0x3e6/0x600
  hardirqs last disabled at (228411): [<ffffffff98245625>] __slab_free+0x1c5/0x600
  softirqs last  enabled at (228396): [<ffffffff98e0031e>] __do_softirq+0x31e/0x427
  softirqs last disabled at (228403): [<ffffffff98072051>] irq_exit+0xd1/0xe0

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(&(&zram->bitmap_lock)->rlock);
    <Interrupt>
      lock(&(&zram->bitmap_lock)->rlock);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  no locks held by zram_verify/2095.

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 5 PID: 2095 Comm: zram_verify Not tainted 4.19.0+ #390
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <IRQ>
   dump_stack+0x67/0x9b
   print_usage_bug+0x1bd/0x1d3
   mark_lock+0x4aa/0x540
   __lock_acquire+0x51d/0x1300
   lock_acquire+0x90/0x180
   _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
   put_entry_bdev+0x1e/0x50
   zram_free_page+0xf6/0x110
   zram_slot_free_notify+0x42/0xa0
   end_swap_bio_read+0x5b/0x170
   blk_update_request+0x8f/0x340
   scsi_end_request+0x2c/0x1e0
   scsi_io_completion+0x98/0x650
   blk_done_softirq+0x9e/0xd0
   __do_softirq+0xcc/0x427
   irq_exit+0xd1/0xe0
   do_IRQ+0x93/0x120
   common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
   </IRQ>

With writeback feature, zram_slot_free_notify could be called in softirq
context by end_swap_bio_read.  However, bitmap_lock is not aware of that
so lockdep yell out:

  get_entry_bdev
  spin_lock(bitmap->lock);
  irq
  softirq
  end_swap_bio_read
  zram_slot_free_notify
  zram_slot_lock <-- deadlock prone
  zram_free_page
  put_entry_bdev
  spin_lock(bitmap->lock); <-- deadlock prone

With akpm's suggestion (i.e.  bitmap operation is already atomic), we
could remove bitmap lock.  It might fail to find a empty slot if serious
contention happens.  However, it's not severe problem because huge page
writeback has already possiblity to fail if there is severe memory
pressure.  Worst case is just keeping the incompressible in memory, not
storage.

The other problem is zram_slot_lock in zram_slot_slot_free_notify.  To
make it safe is this patch introduces zram_slot_trylock where
zram_slot_free_notify uses it.  Although it's rare to be contented, this
patch adds new debug stat "miss_free" to keep monitoring how often it
happens.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Joey Pabalinas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2019
@adlazar @gregkh
vsock/virtio: fix kernel panic from virtio_transport_reset_no_sock
882e786 
[ Upstream commit 4c404ce ]

Previous to commit 22b5c0b ("vsock/virtio: fix kernel panic
after device hot-unplug"), vsock_core_init() was called from
virtio_vsock_probe(). Now, virtio_transport_reset_no_sock() can be called
before vsock_core_init() has the chance to run.

[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000110
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] #PF error: [normal kernel read fault]
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] PGD 0 P4D 0
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] CPU: 3 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7-390-generic-hvi #390
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] Workqueue: virtio_vsock virtio_transport_rx_work [vmw_vsock_virtio_transport]
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] RIP: 0010:virtio_transport_reset_no_sock+0x8c/0xc0 [vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common]
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] Code: 35 8b 4f 14 48 8b 57 08 31 f6 44 8b 4f 10 44 8b 07 48 8d 7d c8 e8 84 f8 ff ff 48 85 c0 48 89 c3 74 2a e8 f7 31 03 00 48 89 df <48> 8b 80 10 01 00 00 e8 68 fb 69 ed 48 8b 75 f0 65 48 33 34 25 28
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] RSP: 0018:ffffb42701ab7d40 EFLAGS: 00010282
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9d79637ee080 RCX: 0000000000000003
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff9d79637ee080
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] RBP: ffffb42701ab7d78 R08: ffff9d796fae70e0 R09: ffff9d796f403500
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] R10: ffffb42701ab7d90 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9d7969d09240
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] R13: ffff9d79624e6840 R14: ffff9d7969d09318 R15: ffff9d796d48ff80
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9d796fac0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] CR2: 0000000000000110 CR3: 0000000427f22000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] Call Trace:
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x63/0x820 [vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common]
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  ? kfree+0x17e/0x190
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  ? detach_buf_split+0x145/0x160
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  virtio_transport_rx_work+0xa0/0x106 [vmw_vsock_virtio_transport]
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] NET: Registered protocol family 40
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  process_one_work+0x167/0x410
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  worker_thread+0x4d/0x460
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  kthread+0x105/0x140
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  ? rescuer_thread+0x360/0x360
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  ? kthread_destroy_worker+0x50/0x50
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] Modules linked in: vmw_vsock_virtio_transport vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common input_leds vsock serio_raw i2c_piix4 mac_hid qemu_fw_cfg autofs4 cirrus ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops virtio_net psmouse drm net_failover pata_acpi virtio_blk failover floppy

Fixes: 22b5c0b ("vsock/virtio: fix kernel panic after device hot-unplug")
Reported-by: Alexandru Herghelegiu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2019
@adlazar @gregkh
vsock/virtio: fix kernel panic from virtio_transport_reset_no_sock
8e59639 
[ Upstream commit 4c404ce ]

Previous to commit 22b5c0b ("vsock/virtio: fix kernel panic
after device hot-unplug"), vsock_core_init() was called from
virtio_vsock_probe(). Now, virtio_transport_reset_no_sock() can be called
before vsock_core_init() has the chance to run.

[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000110
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] #PF error: [normal kernel read fault]
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] PGD 0 P4D 0
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] CPU: 3 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7-390-generic-hvi #390
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] Workqueue: virtio_vsock virtio_transport_rx_work [vmw_vsock_virtio_transport]
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] RIP: 0010:virtio_transport_reset_no_sock+0x8c/0xc0 [vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common]
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] Code: 35 8b 4f 14 48 8b 57 08 31 f6 44 8b 4f 10 44 8b 07 48 8d 7d c8 e8 84 f8 ff ff 48 85 c0 48 89 c3 74 2a e8 f7 31 03 00 48 89 df <48> 8b 80 10 01 00 00 e8 68 fb 69 ed 48 8b 75 f0 65 48 33 34 25 28
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] RSP: 0018:ffffb42701ab7d40 EFLAGS: 00010282
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9d79637ee080 RCX: 0000000000000003
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff9d79637ee080
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] RBP: ffffb42701ab7d78 R08: ffff9d796fae70e0 R09: ffff9d796f403500
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] R10: ffffb42701ab7d90 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9d7969d09240
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] R13: ffff9d79624e6840 R14: ffff9d7969d09318 R15: ffff9d796d48ff80
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9d796fac0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] CR2: 0000000000000110 CR3: 0000000427f22000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] Call Trace:
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x63/0x820 [vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common]
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  ? kfree+0x17e/0x190
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  ? detach_buf_split+0x145/0x160
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  virtio_transport_rx_work+0xa0/0x106 [vmw_vsock_virtio_transport]
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] NET: Registered protocol family 40
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  process_one_work+0x167/0x410
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  worker_thread+0x4d/0x460
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  kthread+0x105/0x140
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  ? rescuer_thread+0x360/0x360
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  ? kthread_destroy_worker+0x50/0x50
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
[Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] Modules linked in: vmw_vsock_virtio_transport vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common input_leds vsock serio_raw i2c_piix4 mac_hid qemu_fw_cfg autofs4 cirrus ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops virtio_net psmouse drm net_failover pata_acpi virtio_blk failover floppy

Fixes: 22b5c0b ("vsock/virtio: fix kernel panic after device hot-unplug")
Reported-by: Alexandru Herghelegiu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
valkerice112 pushed a commit to valkerice112/Raspi-Firmware that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2025
firmware: usb: add usb_mdio config option and set the default to 0x5000
9e38bb5 
Use: usb_mdio=0x7000 to revert the behaviour

kernel: dwc_otg: Don't issue traffic to LS devices in FS mode
See: raspberrypi/linux#390

kernel: Add INITRD, BLK_DEV_DM and DM_CRYPT kernel options
See: raspberrypi/linux#392
See: Hexxeh/rpi-firmware#29

kernel: bump to 3.10.15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@P33M @popcornmix