Skip to content

docs: add new faq docs #1022

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2022
Merged

docs: add new faq docs #1022

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2022

Conversation

dangreen
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

size-limit report 📦

Path Size Loading time (3g) Running time (snapdragon) Total time
dist/index.cjs 841 B (0%) 17 ms (0%) 144 ms (+23.41% 🔺) 160 ms
dist/index.js 742 B (0%) 15 ms (0%) 80 ms (+16.15% 🔺) 95 ms

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #1022 (46fb57a) into master (f7e6064) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1022   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.48%   86.48%           
=======================================
  Files           4        4           
  Lines          74       74           
  Branches       16       16           
=======================================
  Hits           64       64           
  Misses          9        9           
  Partials        1        1           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f7e6064...46fb57a. Read the comment docs.

@dangreen dangreen merged commit 88f6f07 into master Feb 21, 2022
@dangreen dangreen deleted the docs-new-faq branch February 21, 2022 08:12
dangreen added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants