[DRAFT] Block aligned_alloc behind a flag with 10.15 OSX #1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Even though we don't have W instructions for them. This treats them the same as other binary operators.
Opaque pointer cleanup effort. NFC.
Follow-up to llvm#66579: while implementing those semantics in Miri I realized there's a special case to be considered in truncating float casts.
This no longer tests a required feature.
llvm#69824 added libc build, but missed the folder in ninja command, is causing failures. ninja: fatal: chdir to 'docs-libc-html' - No such file or directory ninja: Entering directory `docs-libc-html'
These are an artifact of how types are structured but serve little purpose, merely showing that the type is sugared in some way. For example, ElaboratedType's existence means struct S gets printed as 'struct S':'struct S' in the AST, which is unnecessary visual clutter. Note that skipping the second print when the types have the same string matches what we do for diagnostics, where the aka will be skipped.
This change has virtually no code size regressions on the llvm test suite (+ SPECs) while having these improvements (measured with -Os on Darwin arm64): External/S.../CFP2006/450.soplex/450.soplex 214024.00 213920.00 -0.0% External/S...7speed/641.leela_s/641.leela_s 93412.00 93348.00 -0.1% External/S...17rate/541.leela_r/541.leela_r 93412.00 93348.00 -0.1% MultiSourc.../Applications/JM/lencod/lencod 426044.00 425748.00 -0.1% MultiSourc...rks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast 20436.00 20416.00 -0.1% MultiSourc...ench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm 20436.00 20416.00 -0.1% MultiSourc...Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler 16172.00 16156.00 -0.1% MultiSourc...nch/mpeg2/mpeg2dec/mpeg2decode 35332.00 35256.00 -0.2% SingleSour...Adobe-C++/stepanov_abstraction 6904.00 6888.00 -0.2% External/SPEC/CINT2000/254.gap/254.gap 366060.00 365132.00 -0.3% MultiSourc...-ProxyApps-C++/PENNANT/PENNANT 79688.00 79484.00 -0.3% External/S...NT2006/464.h264ref/464.h264ref 352044.00 351132.00 -0.3% SingleSour...arks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects 15524.00 15480.00 -0.3% SingleSour...arks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector 10728.00 10696.00 -0.3% SingleSour...ks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container 16900.00 16848.00 -0.3% MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc 124184.00 123780.00 -0.3% SingleSour...tout-C++/Shootout-C++-wordfreq 7060.00 7036.00 -0.3% MultiSourc...ity-rijndael/security-rijndael 8976.00 8936.00 -0.4% MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/18-imp/imp 9816.00 9772.00 -0.4% SingleSour...chmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2 1772.00 1764.00 -0.5% MultiSourc...iabench/g721/g721encode/encode 5492.00 5464.00 -0.5% MultiSourc...rks/McCat/03-testtrie/testtrie 1364.00 1344.00 -1.5% SingleSour.../execute/GCC-C-execute-pr42833 400.00 364.00 -9.0% Doing so also prevents a regression described in https://reviews.llvm.org/D143624 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149918
As discussed in [[Driver] Link Flang runtime on Solaris](llvm#65644), `clang -r` incorrectly passes both `-Bdynamic` and `-e _start` to `ld` which lets the linker choke. This patch fixes this, omitting `-Bdynamic` completely which is the linker default. Tested on `amd64-pc-solaris2.11` and `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`.
Avoids unused variable warnings in release builds. NFCI.
…9809) - FreeBSD removed big-endian arm with 12.0. - OpenBSD never had big-endian arm support. I added it just in case, but it has never been used. - Remove sparcel bits. It was sprinkled in a few places but it will never be a thing. - Remove 32-bit sparc bits for FreeBSD. FreeBSD has never had 32-bit sparc support. - Remove sparc64 IAS test as support was enabled across the board awhile ago.
…-downcast (llvm#69529) Add StrictMode option that controls behavior whatever warnings are emitted for casts on non-polymorphic types. Fixes: llvm#69414
I was writing a test that included this error and noticed the spurios newline that made writing the test more awkward.
There are many tests that specify a target triple/CPU flags but no DataLayout which can lead to IR being generated that has unusual behaviour. This commit attempts to use the default DataLayout based on the relevant flags if there is no explicit override on the command line or in the IR file. One thing that is not currently possible to differentiate from a missing datalayout `target datalayout = ""` in the IR file since the current APIs don't allow detecting this case. If it is considered useful to support this case (instead of passing "-data-layout=" on the command line), I can change IR parsers to track whether they have seen such a directive and change the callback type. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141060
…VVFixedLengthDataVector. This seems to be causing issues with using overloaded RVV intrinsics that take scalar operands. If the scalar type passed in doesn't exactly match the element type. I blindly copied this feature from SVE. Since no one has asked for it I'd prefer to remove it to make overloaded intrinsics work as expected. By removing the lax conversions, types declared with __attribute__((riscv_rvv_vector_bits(__riscv_v_fixed_vlen))) can only ever be used like their underlying RVV builtin type. No lax conversions to other element sizes with the same LMUL. Fixes llvm#64404.
Add tosa-to-linalg-pipeline that calls the function addTosaToLinalgPasses, so it gets tested in core also added tests in tosa-to-linalg-pipeline.mlir Signed-off-by: Tai Ly <[email protected]>
Implemented some TODOs and removed unlikely ones. Comment cleanup
Adds an end-to-end test for `vector.contract` that targets SVE (i.e.
scalable vectors). Note that this requires lifting the restriction on
`vector.outerproduct` (to which `vector.contract` is lowered to) that
would deem the following as invalid by the Op verifier (*):
```
vector.outerproduct %27, %28, %26 {kind = #vector.kind<add>} : vector<3xf32>, vector<[2]xf32>
```
This is indeed valid as the end-to-end test demonstrates (at least when
compiling for SVE).
…vm#70268) Fixed assertion failure Basic Block in function 'main' does not have terminator! label %land.end caused by premature setting of CodeGenIP upon entry to emitTargetDataCalls, where subsequent evaluation of logical expression created new basic blocks, leaving CodeGenIP pointing to the wrong basic block. CodeGenIP is now set near the end of the function, just prior to generating a comparison of the logical expression result (from the if clause) which uses CodeGenIP to insert new IR.
It needs to be skipping over debug instructions, whilst not counting them in the MaxLookupDist.
Improve diagnostic message to be more straight forward, fix handling of casting to non-void and add new option AllowCastToVoid to control casting to void behavior. Closes llvm#66570
It's a drop in the ocean considering the lack of documentation of our diagnostics, but it's a start. Co-authored-by: serge-sans-paille <[email protected]>
-mcmodel= is supported for a few architectures. Reject the option for other architectures. * -mcmodel= is unsupported on x86-32. * -mcmodel=large is unsupported for PIC on AArch64. * -mcmodel= is unsupported for aarch64_32 triples. * https://reviews.llvm.org/D67066 (for RISC-V) made -mcmodel=medany/-mcmodel=medlow aliases for all architectures. Restrict this to RISC-V. * llvm/lib/Target/Sparc has some small/medium/large support, but the values listed on https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/SPARC-Options.html had been supported before https://reviews.llvm.org/D67066. Consider -mcmodel= unsupported for Sparc. * https://reviews.llvm.org/D106371 translated -mcmodel=medium to -mcmodel=large on AIX, even for 32-bit systems. Retain this behavior but reject -mcmodel= for other PPC32 systems. In general the accept/reject behavior is more similar to GCC. err_drv_invalid_argument_to_option is less clear than err_drv_unsupported_option_argument. As the supported values are different for different architectures, add a err_drv_unsupported_option_argument_for_target for better clarity.
Since e39f6c1 these tests require a valid target in order to compute the data layout.
On Windows the warning/error messages print opt.exe instead of opt, so just drop this part of the check.
The workaround code ensure we always call __kmpc_kernel_parallel, but it did so in a racy manner as the initialization might not have been completed yet. To avoid introducing a sync, we move the workaround into the deinit function for now.
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2024
…ined member functions & member function templates (llvm#88963) Consider the following snippet from the discussion of CWG2847 on the core reflector: ``` template<typename T> concept C = sizeof(T) <= sizeof(long); template<typename T> struct A { template<typename U> void f(U) requires C<U>; // #1, declares a function template void g() requires C<T>; // #2, declares a function template<> void f(char); // #3, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function }; template<> template<typename U> void A<short>::f(U) requires C<U>; // #4, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template template<> template<> void A<int>::f(int); // #5, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template<> void A<long>::g(); // #6, an explicit specialization of a function that declares a function ``` A number of problems exist: - Clang rejects `#4` because the trailing _requires-clause_ has `U` substituted with the wrong template parameter depth when `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is called to determine whether it matches the trailing _requires-clause_ of the implicitly instantiated function template. - Clang rejects `#5` because the function template specialization instantiated from `A<int>::f` has a trailing _requires-clause_, but `#5` does not (nor can it have one as it isn't a templated function). - Clang rejects `#6` for the same reasons it rejects `#5`. This patch resolves these issues by making the following changes: - To fix `#4`, `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is passed `FunctionTemplateDecl`s when comparing the trailing _requires-clauses_ of `#4` and the function template instantiated from `#1`. - To fix `#5` and `#6`, the trailing _requires-clauses_ are not compared for explicit specializations that declare functions. In addition to these changes, `CheckMemberSpecialization` now considers constraint satisfaction/constraint partial ordering when determining which member function is specialized by an explicit specialization of a member function for an implicit instantiation of a class template (we previously would select the first function that has the same type as the explicit specialization). With constraints taken under consideration, we match EDG's behavior for these declarations.
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2024
...which caused issues like > ==42==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x32 (50) bytes at address 0x117e0000 (error code: 28) > ==42==Cannot dump memory map on emscriptenAddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: sanitizer_common.cpp:81 "((0 && "unable to unmmap")) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) (tid=288045824) > #0 0x14f73b0c in __asan::CheckUnwind()+0x14f73b0c (this.program+0x14f73b0c) > #1 0x14f8a3c2 in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long)+0x14f8a3c2 (this.program+0x14f8a3c2) > #2 0x14f7d6e1 in __sanitizer::ReportMunmapFailureAndDie(void*, unsigned long, int, bool)+0x14f7d6e1 (this.program+0x14f7d6e1) > #3 0x14f81fbd in __sanitizer::UnmapOrDie(void*, unsigned long)+0x14f81fbd (this.program+0x14f81fbd) > #4 0x14f875df in __sanitizer::SuppressionContext::ParseFromFile(char const*)+0x14f875df (this.program+0x14f875df) > #5 0x14f74eab in __asan::InitializeSuppressions()+0x14f74eab (this.program+0x14f74eab) > #6 0x14f73a1a in __asan::AsanInitInternal()+0x14f73a1a (this.program+0x14f73a1a) when trying to use an ASan suppressions file under Emscripten: Even though it would be considered OK by SUSv4, the Emscripten runtime states "We don't support partial munmapping" (see <emscripten-core/emscripten@f4115eb> "Implement MAP_ANONYMOUS on top of malloc in STANDALONE_WASM mode (llvm#16289)"). Co-authored-by: Stephan Bergmann <[email protected]>
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2024
…ication as used during partial ordering (llvm#91534) We do not deduce template arguments from the exception specification when determining the primary template of a function template specialization or when taking the address of a function template. Therefore, this patch changes `isAtLeastAsSpecializedAs` such that we do not mark template parameters in the exception specification as 'used' during partial ordering (per [temp.deduct.partial] p12) to prevent the following from being ambiguous: ``` template<typename T, typename U> void f(U) noexcept(noexcept(T())); // #1 template<typename T> void f(T*) noexcept; // #2 template<> void f<int>(int*) noexcept; // currently ambiguous, selects #2 with this patch applied ``` Although there is no corresponding wording in the standard (see core issue filed here cplusplus/CWG#537), this seems to be the intended behavior given the definition of _deduction substitution loci_ in [temp.deduct.general] p7 (and EDG does the same thing).
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2024
…erSize (llvm#67657)" This reverts commit f0b3654. This commit triggers UB by reading an uninitialized variable. `UP.PartialThreshold` is used uninitialized in `getUnrollingPreferences()` when it is called from `LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan()`. In this case the `UP` variable is created on the stack and its fields are not initialized. ``` ==8802==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x557c0b081b99 in llvm::BasicTTIImplBase<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/BasicTTIImpl.h #1 0x557c0b07a40c in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::Model<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h:2277:17 #2 0x557c0f5d69ee in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) const llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.cpp:387:19 #3 0x557c0e6b96a0 in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7624:7 #4 0x557c0e6e4b63 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::processLoop(llvm::Loop*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10253:13 #5 0x557c0e6f2429 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::runImpl(llvm::Function&, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::LoopInfo&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo&, llvm::DominatorTree&, llvm::BlockFrequencyInfo*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfo*, llvm::DemandedBits&, llvm::AssumptionCache&, llvm::LoopAccessInfoManager&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter&, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10344:30 #6 0x557c0e6f2f97 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::run(llvm::Function&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Function>&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10383:9 [...] Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'UP' in the stack frame #0 0x557c0e6b961e in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7623:3 ```
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2024
…vm#90820) This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default. When performing template argument deduction, a template template parameter containing no packs should be more specialized than one that does. Given the following example: ```C++ template<class T2> struct A; template<template<class ...T3s> class TT1, class T4> struct A<TT1<T4>>; // #1 template<template<class T5 > class TT2, class T6> struct A<TT2<T6>>; // #2 template<class T1> struct B; template struct A<B<char>>; ``` Prior to P0522, candidate `#2` would be more specialized. After P0522, neither is more specialized, so this becomes ambiguous. With this change, `#2` becomes more specialized again, maintaining compatibility with pre-P0522 implementations. The problem is that in P0522, candidates are at least as specialized when matching packs to fixed-size lists both ways, whereas before, a fixed-size list is more specialized. This patch keeps the original behavior when checking template arguments outside deduction, but restores this aspect of pre-P0522 matching during deduction. --- Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't provide a changelog entry here.
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2024
…llvm#92855) This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default. When performing template argument deduction, we extend the provisional wording introduced in llvm#89807 so it also covers deduction of class templates. Given the following example: ```C++ template <class T1, class T2 = float> struct A; template <class T3> struct B; template <template <class T4> class TT1, class T5> struct B<TT1<T5>>; // #1 template <class T6, class T7> struct B<A<T6, T7>>; // #2 template struct B<A<int>>; ``` Prior to P0522, `#2` was picked. Afterwards, this became ambiguous. This patch restores the pre-P0522 behavior, `#2` is picked again. This has the beneficial side effect of making the following code valid: ```C++ template<class T, class U> struct A {}; A<int, float> v; template<template<class> class TT> void f(TT<int>); // OK: TT picks 'float' as the default argument for the second parameter. void g() { f(v); } ``` --- Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't provide a changelog entry here.
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2024
The problematic program is as follows:
```shell
#define pre_a 0
#define PRE(x) pre_##x
void f(void) {
PRE(a) && 0;
}
int main(void) { return 0; }
```
in which after token concatenation (`##`), there's another nested macro
`pre_a`.
Currently only the outer expansion region will be produced. ([compiler
explorer
link](https://godbolt.org/#g:!((g:!((g:!((h:codeEditor,i:(filename:'1',fontScale:14,fontUsePx:'0',j:1,lang:___c,selection:(endColumn:29,endLineNumber:8,positionColumn:29,positionLineNumber:8,selectionStartColumn:29,selectionStartLineNumber:8,startColumn:29,startLineNumber:8),source:'%23define+pre_a+0%0A%23define+PRE(x)+pre_%23%23x%0A%0Avoid+f(void)+%7B%0A++++PRE(a)+%26%26+0%3B%0A%7D%0A%0Aint+main(void)+%7B+return+0%3B+%7D'),l:'5',n:'0',o:'C+source+%231',t:'0')),k:51.69491525423727,l:'4',n:'0',o:'',s:0,t:'0'),(g:!((g:!((h:compiler,i:(compiler:cclang_assertions_trunk,filters:(b:'0',binary:'1',binaryObject:'1',commentOnly:'0',debugCalls:'1',demangle:'0',directives:'0',execute:'0',intel:'0',libraryCode:'1',trim:'1',verboseDemangling:'0'),flagsViewOpen:'1',fontScale:14,fontUsePx:'0',j:2,lang:___c,libs:!(),options:'-fprofile-instr-generate+-fcoverage-mapping+-fcoverage-mcdc+-Xclang+-dump-coverage-mapping+',overrides:!(),selection:(endColumn:1,endLineNumber:1,positionColumn:1,positionLineNumber:1,selectionStartColumn:1,selectionStartLineNumber:1,startColumn:1,startLineNumber:1),source:1),l:'5',n:'0',o:'+x86-64+clang+(assertions+trunk)+(Editor+%231)',t:'0')),k:34.5741843594503,l:'4',m:28.903654485049834,n:'0',o:'',s:0,t:'0'),(g:!((h:output,i:(compilerName:'x86-64+clang+(trunk)',editorid:1,fontScale:14,fontUsePx:'0',j:2,wrap:'1'),l:'5',n:'0',o:'Output+of+x86-64+clang+(assertions+trunk)+(Compiler+%232)',t:'0')),header:(),l:'4',m:71.09634551495017,n:'0',o:'',s:0,t:'0')),k:48.30508474576271,l:'3',n:'0',o:'',t:'0')),l:'2',m:100,n:'0',o:'',t:'0')),version:4))
```text
f:
File 0, 4:14 -> 6:2 = #0
Decision,File 0, 5:5 -> 5:16 = M:0, C:2
Expansion,File 0, 5:5 -> 5:8 = #0 (Expanded file = 1)
File 0, 5:15 -> 5:16 = #1
Branch,File 0, 5:15 -> 5:16 = 0, 0 [2,0,0]
File 1, 2:16 -> 2:23 = #0
File 2, 1:15 -> 1:16 = #0
File 2, 1:15 -> 1:16 = #0
Branch,File 2, 1:15 -> 1:16 = 0, 0 [1,2,0]
```
The inner expansion region isn't produced because:
1. In the range-based for loop quoted below, each sloc is processed and
possibly emit a corresponding expansion region.
2. For our sloc in question, its direct parent returned by
`getIncludeOrExpansionLoc()` is a `<scratch space>`, because that's how
`##` is processed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/88b6186af3908c55b357858eb348b5143f21c289/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp#L518-L520
3. This `<scratch space>` cannot be found in the FileID mapping so
`ParentFileID` will be assigned an `std::nullopt`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/88b6186af3908c55b357858eb348b5143f21c289/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp#L521-L526
4. As a result this iteration of for loop finishes early and no
expansion region is added for the sloc.
This problem gets worse with MC/DC: as the example shows, there's a
branch from File 2 but File 2 itself is missing. This will trigger
assertion failures.
The fix is more or less a workaround and takes a similar approach as
llvm#89573.
~~Depends on llvm#89573.~~ This includes llvm#89573. Kudos to @chapuni!
This and llvm#89573 together fix llvm#87000: I tested locally, both the reduced
program and my original use case (fwiw, Linux kernel) can run
successfully.
---------
Co-authored-by: NAKAMURA Takumi <[email protected]>
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2024
…arallel fusion llvm#94391 (llvm#97607)" This reverts commit edbc0e3. Reason for rollback. ASAN complains about this PR: ==4320==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x502000006cd8 at pc 0x55e2978d63cf bp 0x7ffe6431c2b0 sp 0x7ffe6431c2a8 READ of size 8 at 0x502000006cd8 thread T0 #0 0x55e2978d63ce in map<llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> &, llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>, nullptr> mlir/include/mlir/IR/IRMapping.h:40:11 #1 0x55e2978d63ce in mlir::createFused(mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::RewriterBase&, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)>, llvm::function_ref<void (mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface&, mlir::IRMapping)>) mlir/lib/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp:156:11 #2 0x55e2952a614b in mlir::fuseIndependentSiblingForLoops(mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::RewriterBase&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Utils/Utils.cpp:1398:43 #3 0x55e291480c6f in mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/TransformOps/SCFTransformOps.cpp:482:17 #4 0x55e29149ed5e in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #5 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #6 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #7 0x55e294646a8d in applySequenceBlock(mlir::Block&, mlir::transform::FailurePropagationMode, mlir::transform::TransformState&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:1788:15 #8 0x55e29464f927 in mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:2155:10 #9 0x55e2945d28ee in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #10 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #11 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #12 0x55e2974a5fe2 in mlir::transform::applyTransforms(mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>> const&, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&, bool) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:2016:16 #13 0x55e2945888d7 in mlir::transform::applyTransformNamedSequence(mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>>, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::ModuleOp, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/TransformInterpreterUtils.cpp:234:10 #14 0x55e294582446 in (anonymous namespace)::InterpreterPass::runOnOperation() mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/InterpreterPass.cpp:147:16 #15 0x55e2978e93c6 in operator() mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:527:17 #16 0x55e2978e93c6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int)::$_1>(long) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #17 0x55e2978e207a in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #18 0x55e2978e207a in executeAction<mlir::PassExecutionAction, mlir::Pass &> mlir/include/mlir/IR/MLIRContext.h:275:7 #19 0x55e2978e207a in mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:521:21 #20 0x55e2978e5fbf in runPipeline mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:593:16 #21 0x55e2978e5fbf in mlir::PassManager::runPasses(mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:904:10 #22 0x55e2978e5b65 in mlir::PassManager::run(mlir::Operation*) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:884:60 #23 0x55e291ebb460 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:408:17 #24 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 #25 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 #26 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #27 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #28 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 #29 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 #30 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 #31 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 #32 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 #33 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 #34 0x55e291eb15f8 in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:605:10 #35 0x55e29130d1be in main mlir/tools/mlir-opt/mlir-opt.cpp:311:33 #36 0x7fbcf3fff3d3 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x613d3) (BuildId: 9a996398ce14a94560b0c642eb4f6e94) #37 0x55e2912365a9 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120 0x502000006cd8 is located 8 bytes inside of 16-byte region [0x502000006cd0,0x502000006ce0) freed by thread T0 here: #0 0x55e29130b7e2 in operator delete(void*, unsigned long) compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:155:3 #1 0x55e2979eb657 in __libcpp_operator_delete<void *, unsigned long> #2 0x55e2979eb657 in __do_deallocate_handle_size<> #3 0x55e2979eb657 in __libcpp_deallocate #4 0x55e2979eb657 in deallocate #5 0x55e2979eb657 in deallocate #6 0x55e2979eb657 in operator() #7 0x55e2979eb657 in ~vector #8 0x55e2979eb657 in mlir::Block::~Block() mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:24:1 #9 0x55e2979ebc17 in deleteNode llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:42:39 #10 0x55e2979ebc17 in erase llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:205:5 #11 0x55e2979ebc17 in erase llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:209:39 #12 0x55e2979ebc17 in mlir::Block::erase() mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:67:28 #13 0x55e297aef978 in mlir::RewriterBase::eraseBlock(mlir::Block*) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:245:10 #14 0x55e297af0563 in mlir::RewriterBase::inlineBlockBefore(mlir::Block*, mlir::Block*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::ilist_detail::node_options<mlir::Operation, false, false, void, false, void>, false, false>, mlir::ValueRange) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:331:3 #15 0x55e297af06d8 in mlir::RewriterBase::mergeBlocks(mlir::Block*, mlir::Block*, mlir::ValueRange) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:341:3 #16 0x55e297036608 in mlir::scf::ForOp::replaceWithAdditionalYields(mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::ValueRange, bool, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)> const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.cpp:575:12 #17 0x55e2970673ca in mlir::detail::LoopLikeOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::scf::ForOp>::replaceWithAdditionalYields(mlir::detail::LoopLikeOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::ValueRange, bool, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)> const&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.h.inc:658:56 #18 0x55e2978d5feb in replaceWithAdditionalYields blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp.inc:105:14 #19 0x55e2978d5feb in mlir::createFused(mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::RewriterBase&, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)>, llvm::function_ref<void (mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface&, mlir::IRMapping)>) mlir/lib/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp:135:14 #20 0x55e2952a614b in mlir::fuseIndependentSiblingForLoops(mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::RewriterBase&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Utils/Utils.cpp:1398:43 #21 0x55e291480c6f in mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/TransformOps/SCFTransformOps.cpp:482:17 #22 0x55e29149ed5e in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #23 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #24 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #25 0x55e294646a8d in applySequenceBlock(mlir::Block&, mlir::transform::FailurePropagationMode, mlir::transform::TransformState&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:1788:15 #26 0x55e29464f927 in mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:2155:10 #27 0x55e2945d28ee in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56 #28 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14 #29 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48 #30 0x55e2974a5fe2 in mlir::transform::applyTransforms(mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>> const&, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&, bool) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:2016:16 #31 0x55e2945888d7 in mlir::transform::applyTransformNamedSequence(mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>>, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::ModuleOp, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/TransformInterpreterUtils.cpp:234:10 #32 0x55e294582446 in (anonymous namespace)::InterpreterPass::runOnOperation() mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/InterpreterPass.cpp:147:16 #33 0x55e2978e93c6 in operator() mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:527:17 #34 0x55e2978e93c6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int)::$_1>(long) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #35 0x55e2978e207a in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #36 0x55e2978e207a in executeAction<mlir::PassExecutionAction, mlir::Pass &> mlir/include/mlir/IR/MLIRContext.h:275:7 #37 0x55e2978e207a in mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:521:21 #38 0x55e2978e5fbf in runPipeline mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:593:16 #39 0x55e2978e5fbf in mlir::PassManager::runPasses(mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:904:10 llvm#40 0x55e2978e5b65 in mlir::PassManager::run(mlir::Operation*) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:884:60 llvm#41 0x55e291ebb460 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:408:17 llvm#42 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 llvm#43 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 llvm#44 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 llvm#45 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 llvm#46 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 llvm#47 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 llvm#48 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 llvm#49 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 llvm#50 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 llvm#51 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 previously allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x55e29130ab5d in operator new(unsigned long) compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:86:3 #1 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __libcpp_operator_new<unsigned long> #2 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __libcpp_allocate #3 0x55e2979ed5d4 in allocate #4 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __allocate_at_least<std::__u::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> > #5 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __split_buffer #6 0x55e2979ed5d4 in mlir::BlockArgument* std::__u::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::__u::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>>::__push_back_slow_path<mlir::BlockArgument const&>(mlir::BlockArgument const&) #7 0x55e2979ec0f2 in push_back #8 0x55e2979ec0f2 in mlir::Block::addArgument(mlir::Type, mlir::Location) mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:154:13 #9 0x55e29796e457 in parseRegionBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2172:34 #10 0x55e29796e457 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2121:7 #11 0x55e29796b25e in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1785:16 #12 0x55e297035742 in mlir::scf::ForOp::parse(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.cpp:521:14 #13 0x55e291322c18 in llvm::ParseResult llvm::detail::UniqueFunctionBase<llvm::ParseResult, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&>::CallImpl<llvm::ParseResult (*)(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&)>(void*, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:220:12 #14 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:384:12 #15 0x55e29795bea3 in callback_fn<llvm::unique_function<llvm::ParseResult (mlir::OpAsmParser &, mlir::OperationState &)> > llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #16 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #17 0x55e29795bea3 in parseOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1521:9 #18 0x55e29795bea3 in parseCustomOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2017:19 #19 0x55e29795bea3 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseOperation() mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1174:10 #20 0x55e297971d20 in parseBlockBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2296:9 #21 0x55e297971d20 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseBlock(mlir::Block*&) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2226:12 #22 0x55e29796e4f5 in parseRegionBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2184:7 #23 0x55e29796e4f5 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2121:7 #24 0x55e29796b25e in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1785:16 #25 0x55e29796b2cf in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseOptionalRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1796:12 #26 0x55e2978d89ff in mlir::function_interface_impl::parseFunctionOp(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&, bool, mlir::StringAttr, llvm::function_ref<mlir::Type (mlir::Builder&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type>, mlir::function_interface_impl::VariadicFlag, std::__u::basic_string<char, std::__u::char_traits<char>, std::__u::allocator<char>>&)>, mlir::StringAttr, mlir::StringAttr) mlir/lib/Interfaces/FunctionImplementation.cpp:232:14 #27 0x55e2969ba41d in mlir::func::FuncOp::parse(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Func/IR/FuncOps.cpp:203:10 #28 0x55e291322c18 in llvm::ParseResult llvm::detail::UniqueFunctionBase<llvm::ParseResult, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&>::CallImpl<llvm::ParseResult (*)(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&)>(void*, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:220:12 #29 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:384:12 #30 0x55e29795bea3 in callback_fn<llvm::unique_function<llvm::ParseResult (mlir::OpAsmParser &, mlir::OperationState &)> > llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 #31 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 #32 0x55e29795bea3 in parseOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1521:9 #33 0x55e29795bea3 in parseCustomOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2017:19 #34 0x55e29795bea3 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseOperation() mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1174:10 #35 0x55e297959b78 in parse mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2725:20 #36 0x55e297959b78 in mlir::parseAsmSourceFile(llvm::SourceMgr const&, mlir::Block*, mlir::ParserConfig const&, mlir::AsmParserState*, mlir::AsmParserCodeCompleteContext*) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2785:41 #37 0x55e29790d5c2 in mlir::parseSourceFile(std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::Block*, mlir::ParserConfig const&, mlir::LocationAttr*) mlir/lib/Parser/Parser.cpp:46:10 #38 0x55e291ebbfe2 in parseSourceFile<mlir::ModuleOp, const std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> &> mlir/include/mlir/Parser/Parser.h:159:14 #39 0x55e291ebbfe2 in parseSourceFile<mlir::ModuleOp> mlir/include/mlir/Parser/Parser.h:189:10 llvm#40 0x55e291ebbfe2 in mlir::parseSourceFileForTool(std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::ParserConfig const&, bool) mlir/include/mlir/Tools/ParseUtilities.h:31:12 llvm#41 0x55e291ebb263 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:383:33 llvm#42 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9 llvm#43 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12 llvm#44 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12 llvm#45 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12 llvm#46 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16 llvm#47 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3 llvm#48 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3 llvm#49 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3 llvm#50 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10 llvm#51 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14 llvm#52 0x55e291eb15f8 in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:605:10 llvm#53 0x55e29130d1be in main mlir/tools/mlir-opt/mlir-opt.cpp:311:33 llvm#54 0x7fbcf3fff3d3 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x613d3) (BuildId: 9a996398ce14a94560b0c642eb4f6e94) llvm#55 0x55e2912365a9 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free mlir/include/mlir/IR/IRMapping.h:40:11 in map<llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> &, llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>, nullptr> Shadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x502000006a00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006a80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 0x502000006b00: fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006b80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 0x502000006c00: fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa fd fa =>0x502000006c80: fa fa fd fa fa fa fd fd fa fa fd[fd]fa fa fd fd 0x502000006d00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006d80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006e00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006e80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa 0x502000006f00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): Addressable: 00 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Heap left redzone: fa Freed heap region: fd Stack left redzone: f1 Stack mid redzone: f2 Stack right redzone: f3 Stack after return: f5 Stack use after scope: f8 Global redzone: f9 Global init order: f6 Poisoned by user: f7 Container overflow: fc Array cookie: ac Intra object redzone: bb ASan internal: fe Left alloca redzone: ca Right alloca redzone: cb ==4320==ABORTING
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2024
This test is currently flaky on a local Windows amd64 build. The reason is that it relies on the order of `process.threads` but this order is nondeterministic: If we print lldb's inputs and outputs while running, we can see that the breakpoints are always being set correctly, and always being hit: ```sh runCmd: breakpoint set -f "main.c" -l 2 output: Breakpoint 1: where = a.out`func_inner + 1 at main.c:2:9, address = 0x0000000140001001 runCmd: breakpoint set -f "main.c" -l 7 output: Breakpoint 2: where = a.out`main + 17 at main.c:7:5, address = 0x0000000140001021 runCmd: run output: Process 52328 launched: 'C:\workspace\llvm-project\llvm\build\lldb-test-build.noindex\functionalities\unwind\zeroth_frame\TestZerothFrame.test_dwarf\a.out' (x86_64) Process 52328 stopped * thread #1, stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x00007ff68f6b1001 a.out`func_inner at main.c:2:9 1 void func_inner() { -> 2 int a = 1; // Set breakpoint 1 here ^ 3 } 4 5 int main() { 6 func_inner(); 7 return 0; // Set breakpoint 2 here ``` However, sometimes the backtrace printed in this test shows that the process is stopped inside NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory from `ntdll.dll`: ```sh Backtrace at the first breakpoint: frame #0: 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20 frame #1: 0x00007ffecc74585e ntdll.dll`RtlClearThreadWorkOnBehalfTicket + 862 frame #2: 0x00007ffecc3e257d kernel32.dll`BaseThreadInitThunk + 29 frame #3: 0x00007ffecc76af28 ntdll.dll`RtlUserThreadStart + 40 ``` When this happens, the test fails with an assertion error that the stopped thread's zeroth frame's current line number does not match the expected line number. This is because the test is looking at the wrong thread: `process.threads[0]`. If we print the list of threads each time the test is run, we notice that threads are sometimes in a different order, within `process.threads`: ```sh Thread 0: thread #4: tid = 0x9c38, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20 Thread 1: thread #2: tid = 0xa950, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20 Thread 2: thread #1: tid = 0xab18, 0x00007ff64bc81001 a.out`func_inner at main.c:2:9, stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 Thread 3: thread #3: tid = 0xc514, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20 Thread 0: thread #3: tid = 0x018c, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20 Thread 1: thread #1: tid = 0x85c8, 0x00007ff7130c1001 a.out`func_inner at main.c:2:9, stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 Thread 2: thread #2: tid = 0xf344, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20 Thread 3: thread #4: tid = 0x6a50, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20 ``` Use `self.thread()` to consistently select the correct thread, instead. Co-authored-by: kendal <[email protected]>
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2024
…izations of function templates to USRGenerator (llvm#98027) Given the following: ``` template<typename T> struct A { void f(int); // #1 template<typename U> void f(U); // #2 template<> void f<int>(int); // #3 }; ``` Clang will generate the same USR for `#1` and `#2`. This patch fixes the issue by including the template arguments of dependent class scope explicit specializations in their USRs.
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2024
This patch adds a frame recognizer for Clang's `__builtin_verbose_trap`, which behaves like a `__builtin_trap`, but emits a failure-reason string into debug-info in order for debuggers to display it to a user. The frame recognizer triggers when we encounter a frame with a function name that begins with `__clang_trap_msg`, which is the magic prefix Clang emits into debug-info for verbose traps. Once such frame is encountered we display the frame function name as the `Stop Reason` and display that frame to the user. Example output: ``` (lldb) run warning: a.out was compiled with optimization - stepping may behave oddly; variables may not be available. Process 35942 launched: 'a.out' (arm64) Process 35942 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Misc.: Function is not implemented frame #1: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] Dummy::func(this=<unavailable>) at verbose_trap.cpp:3:5 [opt] 1 struct Dummy { 2 void func() { -> 3 __builtin_verbose_trap("Misc.", "Function is not implemented"); 4 } 5 }; 6 7 int main() { (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Misc.: Function is not implemented frame #0: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] __clang_trap_msg$Misc.$Function is not implemented$ at verbose_trap.cpp:0 [opt] * frame #1: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] Dummy::func(this=<unavailable>) at verbose_trap.cpp:3:5 [opt] frame #2: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main at verbose_trap.cpp:8:13 [opt] frame #3: 0x0000000189d518b4 dyld`start + 1988 ```
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2024
…linux (llvm#99613) Examples of the output: ARM: ``` # ./a.out AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ================================================================= ==122==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0000007a (pc 0x76e13ac0 bp 0x7eb7fd00 sp 0x7eb7fcc8 T0) ==122==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==122==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x76e13ac0 (/lib/libc.so.6+0x7cac0) #1 0x76dce680 in gsignal (/lib/libc.so.6+0x37680) #2 0x005c2250 (/root/a.out+0x145250) #3 0x76db982c (/lib/libc.so.6+0x2282c) #4 0x76db9918 in __libc_start_main (/lib/libc.so.6+0x22918) ==122==Register values: r0 = 0x00000000 r1 = 0x0000007a r2 = 0x0000000b r3 = 0x76d95020 r4 = 0x0000007a r5 = 0x00000001 r6 = 0x005dcc5c r7 = 0x0000010c r8 = 0x0000000b r9 = 0x76f9ece0 r10 = 0x00000000 r11 = 0x7eb7fd00 r12 = 0x76dce670 sp = 0x7eb7fcc8 lr = 0x76e13ab4 pc = 0x76e13ac0 AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV (/lib/libc.so.6+0x7cac0) ==122==ABORTING ``` AArch64: ``` # ./a.out UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ==99==ERROR: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000063 (pc 0x007fbbbc5860 bp 0x007fcfdcb700 sp 0x007fcfdcb700 T99) ==99==The signal is caused by a UNKNOWN memory access. ==99==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x007fbbbc5860 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x82860) #1 0x007fbbb81578 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3e578) #2 0x00556051152c (/root/a.out+0x3152c) #3 0x007fbbb6e268 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2b268) #4 0x007fbbb6e344 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2b344) #5 0x0055604e45ec (/root/a.out+0x45ec) ==99==Register values: x0 = 0x0000000000000000 x1 = 0x0000000000000063 x2 = 0x000000000000000b x3 = 0x0000007fbbb41440 x4 = 0x0000007fbbb41580 x5 = 0x3669288942d44cce x6 = 0x0000000000000000 x7 = 0x00000055605110b0 x8 = 0x0000000000000083 x9 = 0x0000000000000000 x10 = 0x0000000000000000 x11 = 0x0000000000000000 x12 = 0x0000007fbbdb3360 x13 = 0x0000000000010000 x14 = 0x0000000000000039 x15 = 0x00000000004113a0 x16 = 0x0000007fbbb81560 x17 = 0x0000005560540138 x18 = 0x000000006474e552 x19 = 0x0000000000000063 x20 = 0x0000000000000001 x21 = 0x000000000000000b x22 = 0x0000005560511510 x23 = 0x0000007fcfdcb918 x24 = 0x0000007fbbdb1b50 x25 = 0x0000000000000000 x26 = 0x0000007fbbdb2000 x27 = 0x000000556053f858 x28 = 0x0000000000000000 fp = 0x0000007fcfdcb700 lr = 0x0000007fbbbc584c sp = 0x0000007fcfdcb700 UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: SEGV (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x82860) ==99==ABORTING ```
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2024
```
UBSan-Standalone-sparc :: TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp
```
`FAIL`s on 32 and 64-bit Linux/sparc64 (and on Solaris/sparcv9, too: the
test isn't Linux-specific at all). With
`UBSAN_OPTIONS=fast_unwind_on_fatal=1`, the stack trace shows a
duplicate innermost frame:
```
compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:31: runtime error: execution reached the end of a value-returning function without returning a value
#0 0x7003a708 in f() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:35
#1 0x7003a708 in f() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:35
#2 0x7003a714 in g() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:17:38
```
which isn't seen with `fast_unwind_on_fatal=0`.
This turns out to be another fallout from fixing
`__builtin_return_address`/`__builtin_extract_return_addr` on SPARC. In
`sanitizer_stacktrace_sparc.cpp` (`BufferedStackTrace::UnwindFast`) the
`pc` arg is the return address, while `pc1` from the stack frame
(`fr_savpc`) is the address of the `call` insn, leading to a double
entry for the innermost frame in `trace_buffer[]`.
This patch fixes this by moving the adjustment before all uses.
Tested on `sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu` and `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`
(with the `ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux` tests enabled).
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2024
…lvm#104148) `hasOperands` does not always execute matchers in the order they are written. This can cause issue in code using bindings when one operand matcher is relying on a binding set by the other. With this change, the first matcher present in the code is always executed first and any binding it sets are available to the second matcher. Simple example with current version (1 match) and new version (2 matches): ```bash > cat tmp.cpp int a = 13; int b = ((int) a) - a; int c = a - ((int) a); > clang-query tmp.cpp clang-query> set traversal IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource clang-query> m binaryOperator(hasOperands(cStyleCastExpr(has(declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl().bind("d"))))), declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl(equalsBoundNode("d")))))) Match #1: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here int a = 13; ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:2:9: note: "root" binds here int b = ((int)a) - a; ^~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 match. > ./build/bin/clang-query tmp.cpp clang-query> set traversal IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource clang-query> m binaryOperator(hasOperands(cStyleCastExpr(has(declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl().bind("d"))))), declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl(equalsBoundNode("d")))))) Match #1: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here 1 | int a = 13; | ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:2:9: note: "root" binds here 2 | int b = ((int)a) - a; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ Match #2: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here 1 | int a = 13; | ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:3:9: note: "root" binds here 3 | int c = a - ((int)a); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 matches. ``` If this should be documented or regression tested anywhere please let me know where.
cjappl
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2024
…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame #4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame #5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ```
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2024
`JITDylibSearchOrderResolver` local variable can be destroyed before
completion of all callbacks. Capture it together with `Deps` in
`OnEmitted` callback.
Original error:
```
==2035==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-return on address 0x7bebfa155b70 at pc 0x7ff2a9a88b4a bp 0x7bec08d51980 sp 0x7bec08d51978
READ of size 8 at 0x7bebfa155b70 thread T87 (tf_xla-cpu-llvm)
#0 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in operator() llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:58
#1 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in __invoke<(lambda at llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:9) &, const llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> >, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> > > > &> libcxx/include/__type_traits/invoke.h:149:25
#2 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in __call<(lambda at llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:9) &, const llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> >, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> > > > &> libcxx/include/__type_traits/invoke.h:224:5
#3 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in operator() libcxx/include/__functional/function.h:210:12
#4 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in void std::__u::__function::__policy_invoker<void (llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr,
```
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2024
When SPARC Asan testing is enabled by PR llvm#107405, many Linux/sparc64 tests just hang like ``` #0 0xf7ae8e90 in syscall () from /usr/lib32/libc.so.6 #1 0x701065e8 in __sanitizer::FutexWait(__sanitizer::atomic_uint32_t*, unsigned int) () at compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cpp:766 #2 0x70107c90 in Wait () at compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.cpp:35 #3 0x700f7cac in Lock () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:196 #4 Lock () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_thread_registry.h:98 #5 LockThreads () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_thread.cpp:489 #6 0x700e9c8c in __asan::BeforeFork() () at compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_posix.cpp:157 #7 0xf7ac83f4 in ?? () from /usr/lib32/libc.so.6 Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?) ``` It turns out that this happens in tests using `internal_fork` (e.g. invoking `llvm-symbolizer`): unlike most other Linux targets, which use `clone`, Linux/sparc64 has to use `__fork` instead. While `clone` doesn't trigger `pthread_atfork` handlers, `__fork` obviously does, causing the hang. To avoid this, this patch disables `InstallAtForkHandler` and lets the ASan tests run to completion. Tested on `sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu`.
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2024
…ap (llvm#108825) This attempts to improve user-experience when LLDB stops on a verbose_trap. Currently if a `__builtin_verbose_trap` triggers, we display the first frame above the call to the verbose_trap. So in the newly added test case, we would've previously stopped here: ``` (lldb) run Process 28095 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64) Process 28095 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access frame #1: 0x0000000100003f5c a.out`std::__1::vector<int>::operator[](this=0x000000016fdfebef size=0, (null)=10) at verbose_trap.cpp:6:9 3 template <typename T> 4 struct vector { 5 void operator[](unsigned) { -> 6 __builtin_verbose_trap("Bounds error", "out-of-bounds access"); 7 } 8 }; ``` After this patch, we would stop in the first non-`std` frame: ``` (lldb) run Process 27843 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64) Process 27843 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access frame #2: 0x0000000100003f44 a.out`g() at verbose_trap.cpp:14:5 11 12 void g() { 13 std::vector<int> v; -> 14 v[10]; 15 } 16 ``` rdar://134490328
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2024
Random testing found that the Z3 wrapper does not support UnarySymExpr, which was added recently and not included in the original Z3 wrapper. For now, just avoid submitting expressions to Z3 to avoid compiler crashes. Some crash context ... clang -cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core z3-unarysymexpr.c -analyzer-constraints=z3 Unsupported expression to reason about! UNREACHABLE executed at clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/SMTConstraintManager.h:297! Stack dump: 3. <root>/clang/test/Analysis/z3-unarysymexpr.c:13:7: Error evaluating branch #0 <addr> llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) #1 <addr> llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() #8 <addr> clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assumeAux( llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, bool) #9 <addr> clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assume( llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, bool) Co-authored-by: einvbri <[email protected]>
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2024
…ext is not fully initialized (llvm#110481) As this comment around target initialization implies: ``` // This can be NULL if we don't know anything about the architecture or if // the target for an architecture isn't enabled in the llvm/clang that we // built ``` There are cases where we might fail to call `InitBuiltinTypes` when creating the backing `ASTContext` for a `TypeSystemClang`. If that happens, the builtins `QualType`s, e.g., `VoidPtrTy`/`IntTy`/etc., are not initialized and dereferencing them as we do in `GetBuiltinTypeForEncodingAndBitSize` (and other places) will lead to nullptr-dereferences. Example backtrace: ``` (lldb) run Assertion failed: (!isNull() && "Cannot retrieve a NULL type pointer"), function getCommonPtr, file Type.h, line 958. Process 2680 stopped * thread #15, name = '<lldb.process.internal-state(pid=2712)>', stop reason = hit program assert frame #4: 0x000000010cdf3cdc liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`DWARFASTParserClang::ExtractIntFromFormValue(lldb_private::CompilerType const&, lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::DWARFFormValue const&) const (.cold.1) + liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`DWARFASTParserClang::ParseObjCMethod(lldb_private::ObjCLanguage::MethodName const&, lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::DWARFDIE const&, lldb_private::CompilerType, ParsedDWARFTypeAttributes , bool) (.cold.1): -> 0x10cdf3cdc <+0>: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-0x10]! 0x10cdf3ce0 <+4>: mov x29, sp 0x10cdf3ce4 <+8>: adrp x0, 545 0x10cdf3ce8 <+12>: add x0, x0, #0xa25 ; "ParseObjCMethod" Target 0: (lldb) stopped. (lldb) bt * thread #15, name = '<lldb.process.internal-state(pid=2712)>', stop reason = hit program assert frame #0: 0x0000000180d08600 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__pthread_kill + 8 frame #1: 0x0000000180d40f50 libsystem_pthread.dylib`pthread_kill + 288 frame #2: 0x0000000180c4d908 libsystem_c.dylib`abort + 128 frame #3: 0x0000000180c4cc1c libsystem_c.dylib`__assert_rtn + 284 * frame #4: 0x000000010cdf3cdc liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`DWARFASTParserClang::ExtractIntFromFormValue(lldb_private::CompilerType const&, lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::DWARFFormValue const&) const (.cold.1) + frame #5: 0x0000000109d30acc liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`lldb_private::TypeSystemClang::GetBuiltinTypeForEncodingAndBitSize(lldb::Encoding, unsigned long) + 1188 frame #6: 0x0000000109aaaed4 liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`DynamicLoaderMacOS::NotifyBreakpointHit(void*, lldb_private::StoppointCallbackContext*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) + 384 ``` This patch adds a one-time user-visible warning for when we fail to initialize the AST to indicate that initialization went wrong for the given target. Additionally, we add checks for whether one of the `ASTContext` `QualType`s is invalid before dereferencing any builtin types. The warning would look as follows: ``` (lldb) target create "a.out" Current executable set to 'a.out' (arm64). (lldb) b main warning: Failed to initialize builtin ASTContext types for target 'some-unknown-triple'. Printing variables may behave unexpectedly. Breakpoint 1: where = a.out`main + 8 at stepping.cpp:5:14, address = 0x0000000100003f90 ``` rdar://134869779
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2025
These were failing on our Windows on Arm bot, or more precisely, not even completing. This is because Microsoft's C runtime does extra parameter validation. So when we called _read with an invalid fd, it called an invalid parameter handler instead of returning an error. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/%20cpp/c-runtime-library/reference/read?view=msvc-170 https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/%20cpp/c-runtime-library/parameter-validation?view=msvc-170 (lldb) run Process 8440 launched: 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\unittests\Host\HostTests.exe' (aarch64) Process 8440 stopped * thread #1, stop reason = Exception 0xc0000409 encountered at address 0x7ffb7453564c frame #0: 0x00007ffb7453564c ucrtbase.dll`_get_thread_local_invalid_parameter_handler + 652 ucrtbase.dll`_get_thread_local_invalid_parameter_handler: -> 0x7ffb7453564c <+652>: brk #0xf003 ucrtbase.dll`_invalid_parameter_noinfo: 0x7ffb74535650 <+0>: b 0x7ffb745354d8 ; _get_thread_local_invalid_parameter_handler + 280 0x7ffb74535654 <+4>: nop 0x7ffb74535658 <+8>: nop You can override this handler but I'm assuming that this reading after close isn't a crucial feature, so disabling the tests seems like the way to go. If it is crucial, we can check the fd before we use it. Tests added by llvm#143946.
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2025
Extend support in LLDB for WebAssembly. This PR adds a new Process plugin (ProcessWasm) that extends ProcessGDBRemote for WebAssembly targets. It adds support for WebAssembly's memory model with separate address spaces, and the ability to fetch the call stack from the WebAssembly runtime. I have tested this change with the WebAssembly Micro Runtime (WAMR, https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime) which implements a GDB debug stub and supports the qWasmCallStack packet. ``` (lldb) process connect --plugin wasm connect://localhost:4567 Process 1 stopped * thread #1, name = 'nobody', stop reason = trace frame #0: 0x40000000000001ad wasm32_args.wasm`main: -> 0x40000000000001ad <+3>: global.get 0 0x40000000000001b3 <+9>: i32.const 16 0x40000000000001b5 <+11>: i32.sub 0x40000000000001b6 <+12>: local.set 0 (lldb) b add Breakpoint 1: where = wasm32_args.wasm`add + 28 at test.c:4:12, address = 0x400000000000019c (lldb) c Process 1 resuming Process 1 stopped * thread #1, name = 'nobody', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x400000000000019c wasm32_args.wasm`add(a=<unavailable>, b=<unavailable>) at test.c:4:12 1 int 2 add(int a, int b) 3 { -> 4 return a + b; 5 } 6 7 int (lldb) bt * thread #1, name = 'nobody', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x400000000000019c wasm32_args.wasm`add(a=<unavailable>, b=<unavailable>) at test.c:4:12 frame #1: 0x40000000000001e5 wasm32_args.wasm`main at test.c:12:12 frame #2: 0x40000000000001fe wasm32_args.wasm ``` This PR is based on an unmerged patch from Paolo Severini: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78801. I intentionally stuck to the foundations to keep this PR small. I have more PRs in the pipeline to support the other features/packets. My motivation for supporting Wasm is to support debugging Swift compiled to WebAssembly: https://www.swift.org/documentation/articles/wasm-getting-started.html
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2025
…erver (llvm#148774) Summary: There was a deadlock was introduced by [PR llvm#146441](llvm#146441) which changed `CurrentThreadIsPrivateStateThread()` to `CurrentThreadPosesAsPrivateStateThread()`. This change caused the execution path in [`ExecutionContextRef::SetTargetPtr()`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/10b5558b61baab59c7d3dff37ffdf0861c0cc67a/lldb/source/Target/ExecutionContext.cpp#L513) to now enter a code block that was previously skipped, triggering [`GetSelectedFrame()`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/10b5558b61baab59c7d3dff37ffdf0861c0cc67a/lldb/source/Target/ExecutionContext.cpp#L522) which leads to a deadlock. Thread 1 gets m_modules_mutex in [`ModuleList::AppendImpl`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/96148f92146e5211685246722664e51ec730e7ba/lldb/source/Core/ModuleList.cpp#L218), Thread 3 gets m_language_runtimes_mutex in [`GetLanguageRuntime`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/96148f92146e5211685246722664e51ec730e7ba/lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp#L1501), but then Thread 1 waits for m_language_runtimes_mutex in [`GetLanguageRuntime`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/96148f92146e5211685246722664e51ec730e7ba/lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp#L1501) while Thread 3 waits for m_modules_mutex in [`ScanForGNUstepObjCLibraryCandidate`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/96148f92146e5211685246722664e51ec730e7ba/lldb/source/Plugins/LanguageRuntime/ObjC/GNUstepObjCRuntime/GNUstepObjCRuntime.cpp#L57). This fixes the deadlock by adding a scoped block around the mutex lock before the call to the notifier, and moved the notifier call outside of the mutex-guarded section. The notifier call [`NotifyModuleAdded`](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/96148f92146e5211685246722664e51ec730e7ba/lldb/source/Target/Target.cpp#L1810) should be thread-safe, since the module should be added to the `ModuleList` before the mutex is released, and the notifier doesn't modify the module list further, and the call is operates on local state and the `Target` instance. ### Deadlocked Thread backtraces: ``` * thread #3, name = 'dbg.evt-handler', stop reason = signal SIGSTOP * frame #0: 0x00007f2f1e2973dc libc.so.6`futex_wait(private=0, expected=2, futex_word=0x0000563786bd5f40) at futex-internal.h:146:13 /*... a bunch of mutex related bt ... */ liblldb.so.21.0git`std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex>::lock_guard(this=0x00007f2f0f1927b0, __m=0x0000563786bd5f40) at std_mutex.h:229:19 frame #8: 0x00007f2f27946eb7 liblldb.so.21.0git`ScanForGNUstepObjCLibraryCandidate(modules=0x0000563786bd5f28, TT=0x0000563786bd5eb8) at GNUstepObjCRuntime.cpp:60:41 frame #9: 0x00007f2f27946c80 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::GNUstepObjCRuntime::CreateInstance(process=0x0000563785e1d360, language=eLanguageTypeObjC) at GNUstepObjCRuntime.cpp:87:8 frame #10: 0x00007f2f2746fca5 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::LanguageRuntime::FindPlugin(process=0x0000563785e1d360, language=eLanguageTypeObjC) at LanguageRuntime.cpp:210:36 frame #11: 0x00007f2f2742c9e3 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Process::GetLanguageRuntime(this=0x0000563785e1d360, language=eLanguageTypeObjC) at Process.cpp:1516:9 ... frame #21: 0x00007f2f2750b5cc liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Thread::GetSelectedFrame(this=0x0000563785e064d0, select_most_relevant=DoNoSelectMostRelevantFrame) at Thread.cpp:274:48 frame #22: 0x00007f2f273f9957 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::ExecutionContextRef::SetTargetPtr(this=0x00007f2f0f193778, target=0x0000563786bd5be0, adopt_selected=true) at ExecutionContext.cpp:525:32 frame #23: 0x00007f2f273f9714 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::ExecutionContextRef::ExecutionContextRef(this=0x00007f2f0f193778, target=0x0000563786bd5be0, adopt_selected=true) at ExecutionContext.cpp:413:3 frame #24: 0x00007f2f270e80af liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Debugger::GetSelectedExecutionContext(this=0x0000563785d83bc0) at Debugger.cpp:1225:23 frame #25: 0x00007f2f271bb7fd liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Statusline::Redraw(this=0x0000563785d83f30, update=true) at Statusline.cpp:136:41 ... * thread #1, name = 'lldb', stop reason = signal SIGSTOP * frame #0: 0x00007f2f1e2973dc libc.so.6`futex_wait(private=0, expected=2, futex_word=0x0000563785e1dd98) at futex-internal.h:146:13 /*... a bunch of mutex related bt ... */ liblldb.so.21.0git`std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex>::lock_guard(this=0x00007ffe62be0488, __m=0x0000563785e1dd98) at std_mutex.h:229:19 frame #8: 0x00007f2f2742c8d1 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Process::GetLanguageRuntime(this=0x0000563785e1d360, language=eLanguageTypeC_plus_plus) at Process.cpp:1510:41 frame #9: 0x00007f2f2743c46f liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Process::ModulesDidLoad(this=0x0000563785e1d360, module_list=0x00007ffe62be06a0) at Process.cpp:6082:36 ... frame #13: 0x00007f2f2715cf03 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::ModuleList::AppendImpl(this=0x0000563786bd5f28, module_sp=ptr = 0x563785cec560, use_notifier=true) at ModuleList.cpp:246:19 frame #14: 0x00007f2f2715cf4c liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::ModuleList::Append(this=0x0000563786bd5f28, module_sp=ptr = 0x563785cec560, notify=true) at ModuleList.cpp:251:3 ... frame #19: 0x00007f2f274349b3 liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Process::ConnectRemote(this=0x0000563785e1d360, remote_url=(Data = "connect://localhost:1234", Length = 24)) at Process.cpp:3250:9 frame #20: 0x00007f2f27411e0e liblldb.so.21.0git`lldb_private::Platform::DoConnectProcess(this=0x0000563785c59990, connect_url=(Data = "connect://localhost:1234", Length = 24), plugin_name=(Data = "gdb-remote", Length = 10), debugger=0x0000563785d83bc0, stream=0x00007ffe62be3128, target=0x0000563786bd5be0, error=0x00007ffe62be1ca0) at Platform.cpp:1926:23 ``` ## Test Plan: Built a hello world a.out Run server in one terminal: ``` ~/llvm/build/Debug/bin/lldb-server g :1234 a.out ``` Run client in another terminal ``` ~/llvm/build/Debug/bin/lldb -o "gdb-remote 1234" -o "b hello.cc:3" ``` Before: Client hangs indefinitely ``` ~/llvm/build/Debug/bin/lldb -o "gdb-remote 1234" -o "b main" (lldb) gdb-remote 1234 ^C^C ``` After: ``` ~/llvm/build/Debug/bin/lldb -o "gdb-remote 1234" -o "b hello.cc:3" (lldb) gdb-remote 1234 Process 837068 stopped * thread #1, name = 'a.out', stop reason = signal SIGSTOP frame #0: 0x00007ffff7fe4a60 ld-linux-x86-64.so.2`_start: -> 0x7ffff7fe4a60 <+0>: movq %rsp, %rdi 0x7ffff7fe4a63 <+3>: callq 0x7ffff7fe5780 ; _dl_start at rtld.c:522:1 ld-linux-x86-64.so.2`_dl_start_user: 0x7ffff7fe4a68 <+0>: movq %rax, %r12 0x7ffff7fe4a6b <+3>: movl 0x18067(%rip), %eax ; _dl_skip_args (lldb) b hello.cc:3 Breakpoint 1: where = a.out`main + 15 at hello.cc:4:13, address = 0x00005555555551bf (lldb) c Process 837068 resuming Process 837068 stopped * thread #1, name = 'a.out', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x00005555555551bf a.out`main at hello.cc:4:13 1 #include <iostream> 2 3 int main() { -> 4 std::cout << "Hello World" << std::endl; 5 return 0; 6 } ```
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2025
…lvm#152156) With this new A320 in-order core, we follow adding the FeatureUseFixedOverScalableIfEqualCost feature to A510 and A520 (llvm#132246), which reaps the same code generation benefits of preferring fixed over scalable when the cost is equal. So when we have: ``` void foo(float* a, float* b, float* dst, unsigned n) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) dst[i] = a[i] + b[i]; } ``` When compiling without the feature enabled, we get: ``` ... ld1b { z0.b }, p0/z, [x0, x10] ld1b { z2.b }, p0/z, [x1, x10] add x12, x0, x10 ldr z1, [x12, #1, mul vl] add x12, x1, x10 ldr z3, [x12, #1, mul vl] fadd z0.s, z2.s, z0.s add x12, x2, x10 fadd z1.s, z3.s, z1.s dech x11 st1b { z0.b }, p0, [x2, x10] incb x10, all, mul #2 str z1, [x12, #1, mul vl] ... ``` When compiling with, we get: ``` ... ldp q0, q1, [x12, #-16] ldp q2, q3, [x11, #-16] subs x13, x13, #8 fadd v0.4s, v2.4s, v0.4s fadd v1.4s, v3.4s, v1.4s add x11, x11, #32 add x12, x12, #32 stp q0, q1, [x10, #-16] add x10, x10, #32 ... ```
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2025
M68k's SETCC instruction (`scc`) distinctly fills the destination byte
with all 1s. If boolean contents are set to `ZeroOrOneBooleanContent`,
LLVM can mistakenly think the destination holds `0x01` instead of `0xff`
and emit broken code as a result. This change corrects the boolean
content type to `ZeroOrNegativeOneBooleanContent`.
For example, this IR:
```llvm
define dso_local signext range(i8 0, 2) i8 @testBool(i32 noundef %a) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
entry:
%cmp = icmp eq i32 %a, 4660
%. = zext i1 %cmp to i8
ret i8 %.
}
```
would previously build as:
```asm
testBool: ; @testBool
cmpi.l llvm#4660, (4,%sp)
seq %d0
and.l llvm#255, %d0
rts
```
Notice the `zext` is erroneously not clearing the low bits, and thus the
register returns with 255 instead of 1. This patch fixes the issue:
```asm
testBool: ; @testBool
cmpi.l llvm#4660, (4,%sp)
seq %d0
and.l #1, %d0
rts
```
Most of the tests containing `scc` suffered from the same value error as
described above, so those tests have been updated to match the new
output (which also logically corrects them).
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2025
## Problem When the new setting ``` set target.parallel-module-load true ``` was added, lldb began fetching modules from the devices from multiple threads simultaneously. This caused crashes of lldb when debugging on android devices. The top of the stack in the crash look something like this: ``` #0 0x0000555aaf2b27fe llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/opt/llvm/bin/lldb-dap+0xb87fe) #1 0x0000555aaf2b0a99 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/opt/llvm/bin/lldb-dap+0xb6a99) #2 0x0000555aaf2b2fda SignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) (/opt/llvm/bin/lldb-dap+0xb8fda) #3 0x00007f9c02444560 __restore_rt /home/engshare/third-party2/glibc/2.34/src/glibc-2.34/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc_sigaction.c:13:0 #4 0x00007f9c04ea7707 lldb_private::ConnectionFileDescriptor::Disconnect(lldb_private::Status*) (usr/bin/../lib/liblldb.so.15+0x22a7707) #5 0x00007f9c04ea5b41 lldb_private::ConnectionFileDescriptor::~ConnectionFileDescriptor() (usr/bin/../lib/liblldb.so.15+0x22a5b41) #6 0x00007f9c04ea5c1e lldb_private::ConnectionFileDescriptor::~ConnectionFileDescriptor() (usr/bin/../lib/liblldb.so.15+0x22a5c1e) #7 0x00007f9c052916ff lldb_private::platform_android::AdbClient::SyncService::Stat(lldb_private::FileSpec const&, unsigned int&, unsigned int&, unsigned int&) (usr/bin/../lib/liblldb.so.15+0x26916ff) #8 0x00007f9c0528b9dc lldb_private::platform_android::PlatformAndroid::GetFile(lldb_private::FileSpec const&, lldb_private::FileSpec const&) (usr/bin/../lib/liblldb.so.15+0x268b9dc) ``` Our workaround was to set `set target.parallel-module-load ` to `false` to avoid the crash. ## Background PlatformAndroid creates two different classes with one stateful adb connection shared between the two -- one through AdbClient and another through AdbClient::SyncService. The connection management and state is complex, and seems to be responsible for the segfault we are seeing. The AdbClient code resets these connections at times, and re-establishes connections if they are not active. Similarly, PlatformAndroid caches its SyncService, which uses an AdbClient class, but the SyncService puts its connection into a different 'sync' state that is incompatible with a standard connection. ## Changes in this diff * This diff refactors the code to (hopefully) have clearer ownership of the connection, clearer separation of AdbClient and SyncService by making a new class for clearer separations of concerns, called AdbSyncService. * New unit tests are added * Additional logs were added (see llvm#145382 (comment) for details)
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2025
…namic (llvm#153420) Canonicalizing the following IR: ``` func.func @mul_zero_dynamic_nofold(%arg0: tensor<?x17xf32>) -> tensor<?x17xf32> { %0 = "tosa.const"() <{values = dense<0.000000e+00> : tensor<1x1xf32>}> : () -> tensor<1x1xf32> %1 = "tosa.const"() <{values = dense<0> : tensor<1xi8>}> : () -> tensor<1xi8> %2 = tosa.mul %arg0, %0, %1 : (tensor<?x17xf32>, tensor<1x1xf32>, tensor<1xi8>) -> tensor<?x17xf32> return %2 : tensor<?x17xf32> } ``` resulted in a crash ``` #0 0x000056513187e8db backtrace (./build-release/bin/mlir-opt+0x9d698db) #1 0x0000565131b17737 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /local-ssd/sayans/Softwares/llvm-repo/llvm-project-latest/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:838:8 #2 0x0000565131b187f3 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) /local-ssd/sayans/Softwares/llvm-repo/llvm-project-latest/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:918:1 #3 0x0000565131b18c30 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /local-ssd/sayans/Softwares/llvm-repo/llvm-project-latest/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:18 #4 0x0000565131b18c30 SignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) /local-ssd/sayans/Softwares/llvm-repo/llvm-project-latest/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:409:3 #5 0x00007f2e4165b050 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3c050) #6 0x00007f2e416a9eec __pthread_kill_implementation ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44:76 #7 0x00007f2e4165afb2 raise ./signal/../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27:6 #8 0x00007f2e41645472 abort ./stdlib/abort.c:81:7 #9 0x00007f2e41645395 _nl_load_domain ./intl/loadmsgcat.c:1177:9 #10 0x00007f2e41653ec2 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x34ec2) #11 0x00005651443ec4ba mlir::DenseIntOrFPElementsAttr::getRaw(mlir::ShapedType, llvm::ArrayRef<char>) /local-ssd/sayans/Softwares/llvm-repo/llvm-project-latest/mlir/lib/IR/BuiltinAttributes.cpp:1361:3 #12 0x00005651443f1209 mlir::DenseElementsAttr::resizeSplat(mlir::ShapedType) /local-ssd/sayans/Softwares/llvm-repo/llvm-project-latest/mlir/lib/IR/BuiltinAttributes.cpp:0:10 #13 0x000056513f76f2b6 mlir::tosa::MulOp::fold(mlir::tosa::MulOpGenericAdaptor<llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Attribute>>) /local-ssd/sayans/Softwares/llvm-repo/llvm-project-latest/mlir/lib/Dialect/Tosa/IR/TosaCanonicalizations.cpp:0:0 ``` from the folder for `tosa::mul` since the zero value was being reshaped to `?x17` size which isn't supported. AFAIK, `tosa.const` requires all dimensions to be static. So in this case, the fix is to not to fold the op.
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2025
…vm#153560) Fixes llvm#153157 The proposed solution has been discussed here (llvm#153157 (comment)) This is what we would be seeing now ``` base) anutosh491@Anutoshs-MacBook-Air bin % ./lldb /Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out (lldb) target create "/Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out" Current executable set to '/Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out' (arm64). (lldb) b main Breakpoint 1: where = a.out`main, address = 0x0000000100003f90 (lldb) r Process 71227 launched: '/Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out' (arm64) Process 71227 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x0000000100003f90 a.out`main a.out`main: -> 0x100003f90 <+0>: sub sp, sp, #0x10 0x100003f94 <+4>: str wzr, [sp, #0xc] 0x100003f98 <+8>: str w0, [sp, #0x8] 0x100003f9c <+12>: str x1, [sp] (lldb) expression --repl -l c -- 1> 1 + 1 (int) $0 = 2 2> 2 + 2 (int) $1 = 4 ``` ``` base) anutosh491@Anutoshs-MacBook-Air bin % ./lldb /Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out (lldb) target create "/Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out" Current executable set to '/Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out' (arm64). (lldb) b main Breakpoint 1: where = a.out`main, address = 0x0000000100003f90 (lldb) r Process 71355 launched: '/Users/anutosh491/work/xeus-cpp/a.out' (arm64) Process 71355 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x0000000100003f90 a.out`main a.out`main: -> 0x100003f90 <+0>: sub sp, sp, #0x10 0x100003f94 <+4>: str wzr, [sp, #0xc] 0x100003f98 <+8>: str w0, [sp, #0x8] 0x100003f9c <+12>: str x1, [sp] (lldb) expression --repl -l c -- 3 + 3 Warning: trailing input is ignored in --repl mode 1> 1 + 1 (int) $0 = 2 ```
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2025
This can happen when JIT code is run, and we can't symbolize those
frames, but they should remain numbered in the stack. An example
spidermonkey trace:
```
#0 0x564ac90fb80f (/builds/worker/dist/bin/js+0x240e80f) (BuildId: 5d053c76aad4cfbd08259f8832e7ac78bbeeab58)
#1 0x564ac9223a64 (/builds/worker/dist/bin/js+0x2536a64) (BuildId: 5d053c76aad4cfbd08259f8832e7ac78bbeeab58)
#2 0x564ac922316f (/builds/worker/dist/bin/js+0x253616f) (BuildId: 5d053c76aad4cfbd08259f8832e7ac78bbeeab58)
#3 0x564ac9eac032 (/builds/worker/dist/bin/js+0x31bf032) (BuildId: 5d053c76aad4cfbd08259f8832e7ac78bbeeab58)
#4 0x0dec477ca22e (<unknown module>)
```
Without this change, the following symbolization is output:
```
#0 0x55a6d72f980f in MOZ_CrashSequence /builds/worker/workspace/obj-build/dist/include/mozilla/Assertions.h:248:3
#1 0x55a6d72f980f in Crash(JSContext*, unsigned int, JS::Value*) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/shell/js.cpp:4223:5
#2 0x55a6d7421a64 in CallJSNative(JSContext*, bool (*)(JSContext*, unsigned int, JS::Value*), js::CallReason, JS::CallArgs const&) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:501:13
#3 0x55a6d742116f in js::InternalCallOrConstruct(JSContext*, JS::CallArgs const&, js::MaybeConstruct, js::CallReason) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:597:12
#4 0x55a6d80aa032 in js::jit::DoCallFallback(JSContext*, js::jit::BaselineFrame*, js::jit::ICFallbackStub*, unsigned int, JS::Value*, JS::MutableHandle<JS::Value>) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/jit/BaselineIC.cpp:1705:10
#4 0x2c803bd8f22e (<unknown module>)
```
The last frame has a duplicate number. With this change the numbering is
correct:
```
#0 0x5620c58ec80f in MOZ_CrashSequence /builds/worker/workspace/obj-build/dist/include/mozilla/Assertions.h:248:3
#1 0x5620c58ec80f in Crash(JSContext*, unsigned int, JS::Value*) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/shell/js.cpp:4223:5
#2 0x5620c5a14a64 in CallJSNative(JSContext*, bool (*)(JSContext*, unsigned int, JS::Value*), js::CallReason, JS::CallArgs const&) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:501:13
#3 0x5620c5a1416f in js::InternalCallOrConstruct(JSContext*, JS::CallArgs const&, js::MaybeConstruct, js::CallReason) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:597:12
#4 0x5620c669d032 in js::jit::DoCallFallback(JSContext*, js::jit::BaselineFrame*, js::jit::ICFallbackStub*, unsigned int, JS::Value*, JS::MutableHandle<JS::Value>) /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/js/src/jit/BaselineIC.cpp:1705:10
#5 0x349f24c7022e (<unknown module>)
```
davidtrevelyan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2025
…gic (llvm#153086) Given the test case: ```llvm define fastcc i16 @testbtst(i16 %a) nounwind { entry: switch i16 %a, label %no [ i16 11, label %yes i16 10, label %yes i16 9, label %yes i16 4, label %yes i16 3, label %yes i16 2, label %yes ] yes: ret i16 1 no: ret i16 0 } ``` We currently get this result: ```asm testbtst: ; @testbtst ; %bb.0: ; %entry move.l %d0, %d1 and.l llvm#65535, %d1 sub.l #11, %d1 bhi .LBB0_3 ; %bb.1: ; %entry and.l llvm#65535, %d0 move.l llvm#3612, %d1 btst %d0, %d1 bne .LBB0_3 ; <------- Erroneous condition ; %bb.2: ; %yes moveq #1, %d0 rts .LBB0_3: ; %no moveq #0, %d0 rts ``` The cause of this is a line that explicitly reverses the `btst` condition code. But on M68k, `btst` sets condition codes the same as `and` with a bitmask, meaning `EQ` indicates failure (bit is zero) and not success, so the condition does not need to be reversed. In my testing, I've only been able to get switch statements to lower to `btst`, so I wasn't able to explicitly test other options for lowering. But (if possible to trigger) I believe they have the same logical error. For example, in `LowerAndToBTST()`, a comment specifies that it's lowering a case where the `and` result is compared against zero, which means the corresponding `btst` condition should also not be reversed. This patch simply flips the ternary expression in `getBitTestCondition()` to match the ISD condition code with the same M68k code, instead of the opposite.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is something that SHOULDN'T BE MERGED in this PR, just putting it up for demonstrative purposes.
This pattern follows something very similar that the other sanitizers do. Similarly, all sanitizers do not pick up on aligned_alloc right now, grep the codebase for
SANITIZER_INTERCEPT_ALIGNED_ALLOCto see where they use it.However the big issue is
set(DEFAULT_SANITIZER_MIN_OSX_VERSION 10.15)
This could be a major breaking change somewhere, although they tend to pull this up over time. I'm not sure of the implications, but it makes me queasy.
One thing we could do is take the rest of this change WITHOUT bumping that min version, and then eventually when they get around to the newer version we get aligned_alloc for free?
Discussed: realtime-sanitizer/rtsan#3