Skip to content

Replace bunyan with pino #1838

Closed
Closed
@ghermeto

Description

@ghermeto

Prefer Pino

Why?

Well maintained, performance-focused, compatible API. Today we always pass a Pino instance to createServer().

Breaking change

bunyan_helper has a complex implementation of RequestCaptureStream based on Bunyan multi-stream and RingBuffer capabilities that Pino don't have. I propose we dropRequestCaptureStream entirely, as it is only used if the user doesn't provide any logger themselves.

Are you willing and able to implement this?

Yes

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions