Move buildRocksetObject call to addCall (from add). #42
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We need to peek into the response stream so that we can pull the last_offset and wait on the fencing / we need read-after-write functionality. We've built a shim to do this, but we also noticed that we lost JEP150/java.time type mapping into Rockset. This was because the plumbing that does this in the Java SDK happened in the add() method and we are using addCall(). It seems that add() will, eventually, call addCall() downstream.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We need to peek into the response stream so that we can pull the last_offset and wait on the fencing / we need read-after-write functionality.
We've built a shim to do this, but we also noticed that we lost JEP150/java.time type mapping into Rockset. This was because the plumbing that does this in the Java SDK happened in the add() method and we are using addCall().
It seems that add() will, eventually, call addCall() downstream.