-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
[ntuple] better error messages in field reconciliation #20023
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ntuple] better error messages in field reconciliation #20023
Conversation
Test Results 22 files 22 suites 3d 21h 1m 1s ⏱️ For more details on these failures, see this check. Results for commit 7d4b7f0. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (delta the missing test and/or sample output in the commit)
Should we add a test for this? |
daddb67
to
97df930
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
97df930
to
83e7047
Compare
Use the type trace report to help identify the violating subfield in a field hiararchy.
83e7047
to
7d4b7f0
Compare
When matching the in-memory field to the on-disk field fails, print a trace of the type hierarchy in-memory and on-disk that helps users to pinpoint the violating sub field.
Follow-up of #19937 (review)