Fix inequality in "stale mtime" log messages #11281
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @ehuss (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
Thanks! @bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
compiler-errors
pushed a commit
to compiler-errors/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2022
5 commits in 071eeaf210708219a5a1b2c4728ca2f97df7f2ae..9210810d1fd7b51ae0439a0a363cc50e36963455 2022-10-22 01:17:55 +0000 to 2022-10-25 22:31:50 +0000 - Fix 410 gone response handling (rust-lang/cargo#11286) - Fix inequality in "stale mtime" log messages (rust-lang/cargo#11281) - doc(cargo-tree): mention it considering feature unification (rust-lang/cargo#11282) - Improve the error message if `publish` is `false` or empty list (rust-lang/cargo#11280) - Add test for deleted index entry (rust-lang/cargo#11278)
compiler-errors
added a commit
to compiler-errors/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2022
Update cargo 5 commits in 071eeaf210708219a5a1b2c4728ca2f97df7f2ae..9210810d1fd7b51ae0439a0a363cc50e36963455 2022-10-22 01:17:55 +0000 to 2022-10-25 22:31:50 +0000 - Fix 410 gone response handling (rust-lang/cargo#11286) - Fix inequality in "stale mtime" log messages (rust-lang/cargo#11281) - doc(cargo-tree): mention it considering feature unification (rust-lang/cargo#11282) - Improve the error message if `publish` is `false` or empty list (rust-lang/cargo#11280) - Add test for deleted index entry (rust-lang/cargo#11278)
JohnTitor
pushed a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2022
Update cargo 5 commits in 071eeaf210708219a5a1b2c4728ca2f97df7f2ae..9210810d1fd7b51ae0439a0a363cc50e36963455 2022-10-22 01:17:55 +0000 to 2022-10-25 22:31:50 +0000 - Fix 410 gone response handling (rust-lang/cargo#11286) - Fix inequality in "stale mtime" log messages (rust-lang/cargo#11281) - doc(cargo-tree): mention it considering feature unification (rust-lang/cargo#11282) - Improve the error message if `publish` is `false` or empty list (rust-lang/cargo#11280) - Add test for deleted index entry (rust-lang/cargo#11278)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR try to resolve?
If
CARGO_LOG=cargo::core::compiler::fingerprint=infois set, cargo will print log messages that are useful for finding out why something is being recompiled. E.g. if the modification time (mtime) of a source file is newer than the cached build result, it will print something like:However, the
!=in the log message is misleading, as equality is not the criterion that's actually used to determine when to rebuild.This PR fixes that by changing
!=to<, corresponding to the actual criterion.How should we test and review this PR?
Look at the criterion I linked and trace
stale_mtimein the log message back topath_mtimein said criterion to see why it has to be<.