Add fexecve() to DragonFly #2467
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @Amanieu (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rtzoeller
force-pushed
the
dfly_fexecve
branch
from
774b2d4 to
6f0857d
Compare
Ignore fexecve signature mismatch, as with other execv variants.
JohnTitor
approved these changes
Oct 20, 2021
|
Thanks! r? @JohnTitor @bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 6f0857d has been approved by |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions, checks-cirrus-freebsd-11, checks-cirrus-freebsd-12, checks-cirrus-freebsd-13 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DragonFly 6.0 added support for
fexecve(2).Implementing it with a mismatched signature from what C exposes, as outlined in #1272, for consistency with other platforms.
Tested with nix-rust/nix#1577