Change the range syntax that is giving ctest problems

Cargo.toml

@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ targets = [
     "armv7r-none-eabihf",
     # FIXME(hexagon): excluded due to duplicate symbol errors
     # "hexagon-unknown-linux-musl",
-    "i586-pc-windows-msvc",
     "i586-unknown-linux-gnu",
     "i586-unknown-linux-musl",
     "i686-linux-android",

ci/verify-build.sh

@@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ armebv7r-none-eabihf \
 armv7-wrs-vxworks-eabihf \
 armv7r-none-eabi \
 armv7r-none-eabihf \
-i586-pc-windows-msvc \
 i686-pc-windows-msvc \
 i686-unknown-haiku \
 i686-unknown-netbsd \

libc-test/test/linux_kernel_version.rs

@@ -1,15 +1,16 @@
 //! Compare libc's KERNEL_VERSION macro against a specific kernel version.
 
-#[cfg(
-    target_os = "linux",
-)]
+#[cfg(target_os = "linux")]
 mod t {
     use libc;
 
     #[test]
     fn test_kernel_version() {
-        unsafe {
-            assert_eq!(libc::KERNEL_VERSION(6, 0, 0), 393216);
-        }
+        assert_eq!(unsafe { libc::KERNEL_VERSION(6, 0, 0) }, 393216);
+        // Check that the patch level saturates
+        assert_eq!(unsafe { libc::KERNEL_VERSION(6, 0, 255) }, 393471);
+        assert_eq!(unsafe { libc::KERNEL_VERSION(6, 0, 256) }, 393471);
+        assert_eq!(unsafe { libc::KERNEL_VERSION(6, 0, 300) }, 393471);
+        assert_eq!(unsafe { libc::KERNEL_VERSION(6, 0, u32::MAX) }, 393471);
     }
 }

src/unix/linux_like/mod.rs

@@ -1755,11 +1755,7 @@ safe_f! {
 
     #[allow(ellipsis_inclusive_range_patterns)]
     pub {const} fn KERNEL_VERSION(a: u32, b: u32, c: u32) -> u32 {
-        ((a << 16) + (b << 8))
-            + match c {
-                0..=255 => c,
-                _ => 255,
-            }
+        ((a << 16) + (b << 8)) + if c > 255 { 255 } else { c }
     }
 }