Skip to content

fix: Try not to invalidate state when the proc macro preference didn't change #12171

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2022

Conversation

lnicola
Copy link
Member

@lnicola lnicola commented May 6, 2022

This appears to fix #12027, but I'm not sure.

@lnicola lnicola force-pushed the proc-macros-dont-invalidate-state branch from 614aefb to 97cdf3e Compare May 6, 2022 06:49
@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented May 6, 2022

@bors r+

Sounds reasonable to me

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 6, 2022

📌 Commit 97cdf3e has been approved by Veykril

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 6, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 97cdf3e with merge db1434b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 6, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Veykril
Pushing db1434b to master...

@bors bors merged commit db1434b into rust-lang:master May 6, 2022
@lnicola lnicola deleted the proc-macros-dont-invalidate-state branch May 6, 2022 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Successively disabling and enabling inlay hints doesn't reliably work without typing a character
3 participants