Skip to content

fix: Correct references from rust-analyzer.cargo.check to rust-analyzer.check #16062

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

davidbarsky
Copy link
Contributor

When reading the manual, I noticed that the documentation referenced configurations that have since been renamed. This PR updates those references to their new names.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 8, 2023
@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Jan 2, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 2, 2024

📌 Commit f556c79 has been approved by Veykril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 2, 2024

⌛ Testing commit f556c79 with merge 9f46ff5...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 2, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Veykril
Pushing 9f46ff5 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 9f46ff5 into rust-lang:master Jan 2, 2024
@davidbarsky davidbarsky deleted the david/fix-references-to-removed-settings branch January 2, 2024 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants