Skip to content

fix: Consider lifetime GATs object unsafe #18162

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2024

Conversation

ChayimFriedman2
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #18156.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 22, 2024
@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Sep 24, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 24, 2024

📌 Commit 1418338 has been approved by Veykril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 24, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 1418338 with merge dfee4c8...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 24, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Veykril
Pushing dfee4c8 to master...

@bors bors merged commit dfee4c8 into rust-lang:master Sep 24, 2024
11 checks passed
@ChayimFriedman2 ChayimFriedman2 deleted the gat-object-safe branch October 6, 2024 22:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect object safety hints with GAT lifetimes
5 participants