Finalize rename infra rewrite #7668
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Veykril
force-pushed
the
rename-stuff
branch
from
e088a17 to
7b64622
Compare
|
bors r+ Nice! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should be the final PR in regards to rewriting rename stuff, #4290.
It addresses 3 things:
- Currently renaming import aliases causes some undesired behavior(see #5198) which is why this PR causes us to just return an error if an attempt at renaming an alias is made for the time being. Though this only prevents it from happening when the alias import is renamed, so its not too helpful.
- Fixes #6898
- If we are inside a macro file simply rename the input name node as there isn't really a way to do any of the fancy shorthand renames and similar things as for that we would have to exactly know what the macro generates and what not.