Skip to content

[no_effect_replace]: Fix duplicate diagnostics #12443

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2024

Conversation

cookie-s
Copy link
Contributor

@cookie-s cookie-s commented Mar 9, 2024

Relates to #12379

Fixes no_effect_replace duplicate diagnostics


changelog: [no_effect_replace]: Fix duplicate diagnostics

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 9, 2024

r? @Alexendoo

rustbot has assigned @Alexendoo.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Mar 9, 2024
@cookie-s cookie-s force-pushed the noeffectreoplace-fix-dup-diags branch from 9d80707 to 7473f05 Compare March 9, 2024 04:05
@Alexendoo
Copy link
Member

Thanks! @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 9, 2024

📌 Commit 7473f05 has been approved by Alexendoo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 9, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 7473f05 with merge 099e2c0...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 9, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: Alexendoo
Pushing 099e2c0 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 099e2c0 into rust-lang:master Mar 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants